Trial Review

Registering a new trial?

To achieve prospective registration, we recommend submitting your trial for registration at the same time as ethics submission.

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov

For full trial details, please see the original record at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03089905




Registration number
NCT03089905
Ethics application status
Date submitted
8/03/2017
Date registered
24/03/2017
Date last updated
5/07/2024

Titles & IDs
Public title
A Study to Compare the Long-term Outcomes After Two Different Anaesthetics
Scientific title
Neurodevelopmental Outcome After Standard Dose Sevoflurane Versus Low-dose Sevoflurane/Dexmedetomidine/Remifentanil Anaesthesia in Young Children- The TREX Trial
Secondary ID [1] 0 0
2024-512385-34-00
Secondary ID [2] 0 0
TREX TRIAL
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Trial acronym
TREX
Linked study record

Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Anesthesia 0 0
Neurotoxicity 0 0
Child Development 0 0
Condition category
Condition code
Neurological 0 0 0 0
Other neurological disorders
Injuries and Accidents 0 0 0 0
Poisoning

Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Sevoflurane
Treatment: Drugs - Remifentanil
Treatment: Drugs - Dexmedetomidine

Experimental: Sevoflurane/dexmedetomidine/remifentanil - Dexmedetomidine: loading dose of 1mcg/kg over 10 minutes followed by an infusion of at 1 mcg/kg/hr.

Remifentanil: loading dose 1 mcg/kg over 2 minutes followed by an infusion starting at 0.1 mcg/kg/min or greater.

Sevoflurane: end tidal concentration of 0.6 -0.8% or less.

Active comparator: Sevoflurane - End tidal concentration of 2.5-3.0% or greater.


Treatment: Drugs: Sevoflurane
Experimental arm: end tidal concentration of 0.6 -0.8% or less. Active comparator arm: end tidal concentration of 2.5-3.0% or greater.

Treatment: Drugs: Remifentanil
Experimental arm: loading dose: 1 mcg/kg, infusion starting at 0.1 mcg/kg/min or greater.

Treatment: Drugs: Dexmedetomidine
Experimental arm: loading dose:1mcg/kg, infusion: 1 mcg/kg/hr.
Intervention code [1] 0 0
Treatment: Drugs
Comparator / control treatment
Control group

Outcomes
Primary outcome [1] 0 0
Full Scale IQ
Timepoint [1] 0 0
3 years of age
Secondary outcome [1] 0 0
incidence of intra-operative hypotension
Timepoint [1] 0 0
150 minutes- duration of surgery (baseline)
Secondary outcome [2] 0 0
incidence of intra-operative bradycardia
Timepoint [2] 0 0
150 minutes- duration of surgery (baseline)
Secondary outcome [3] 0 0
Post-operative pain
Timepoint [3] 0 0
60 minutes- after surgery
Secondary outcome [4] 0 0
Time to recovery
Timepoint [4] 0 0
60 minutes- after surgery
Secondary outcome [5] 0 0
Language outcomes
Timepoint [5] 0 0
3 years of age
Secondary outcome [6] 0 0
Attention/Executive Function/impulse control
Timepoint [6] 0 0
3 years of age
Secondary outcome [7] 0 0
Memory
Timepoint [7] 0 0
3 years of age
Secondary outcome [8] 0 0
Adaptive behaviour
Timepoint [8] 0 0
3 years of age
Secondary outcome [9] 0 0
Clinical Behavior
Timepoint [9] 0 0
3 years of age
Secondary outcome [10] 0 0
Executive Function
Timepoint [10] 0 0
3 years of age
Secondary outcome [11] 0 0
Social Skills
Timepoint [11] 0 0
3 years of age

Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Younger than 2 years (chronological age)
* Scheduled for anaesthesia that is expected to last at least 2 hours (and/or total operating room time is scheduled to be at least 2.5 hours)
* Has a legally acceptable representative capable of understanding the informed consent document and providing consent on the participant's behalf.
Minimum age
No limit
Maximum age
2 Years
Sex
Both males and females
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Key exclusion criteria
* Known neurologic, chromosomal or congenital anomaly which is likely to be associated with poor neurobehavioural outcome
* Existing diagnosis of behavioural or neurodevelopmental disability
* Prematurity (defined as < 36 weeks gestational age at birth)
* Birth weight less than 2 kg.
* Congenital cardiac disease requiring surgery
* Intracranial neurosurgery and intracranial craniofacial surgery (isolated cleft lip is not an exclusion)
* Previous cumulative exposure to general anaesthesia exceeding 2 hours
* Planned future cumulative exposure to anaesthesia exceeding 2 hours before the age of 3 years.
* Any specific contra-indication to any aspect of the protocol
* Previous adverse reaction to any anaesthetic
* Circumstances likely to make long term follow-up impossible
* Living in a household where the primary language spoken at home is not a language in which we can administer the Wechsler Preschool and Primary School Intelligence Scale
* Planned postoperative sedation with any agent except opioids (e.g. benzodiazepines, dexmedetomidine, ketamine, barbiturates, propofol, clonidine, chloral hydrate, and other non-opioid sedatives). For example if such sedation is planned for post-operative ventilation

Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Who is / are masked / blinded?


The people assessing the outcomes
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Other design features
Phase
Phase 3
Type of endpoint/s
Statistical methods / analysis

Recruitment
Recruitment status
Active, not recruiting
Data analysis
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Other reasons
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
10/08/2017
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
1/06/2026
Actual
Sample size
Target
Accrual to date
Final
450
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,QLD,SA,VIC,WA
Recruitment hospital [1] 0 0
Sydney Children's Hospital - Randwick
Recruitment hospital [2] 0 0
Children's Hospital at Westmead - Westmead
Recruitment hospital [3] 0 0
Queensland Children's Hospital - Brisbane
Recruitment hospital [4] 0 0
Women's and Children's Hospital - Adelaide
Recruitment hospital [5] 0 0
Flinders Medical Centre - Bedford Park
Recruitment hospital [6] 0 0
Royal Children's Hospital - Parkville
Recruitment hospital [7] 0 0
Perth Children's Hospital - Perth
Recruitment postcode(s) [1] 0 0
2031 - Randwick
Recruitment postcode(s) [2] 0 0
2145 - Westmead
Recruitment postcode(s) [3] 0 0
4101 - Brisbane
Recruitment postcode(s) [4] 0 0
5006 - Adelaide
Recruitment postcode(s) [5] 0 0
5042 - Bedford Park
Recruitment postcode(s) [6] 0 0
3052 - Parkville
Recruitment postcode(s) [7] 0 0
6008 - Perth
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [1] 0 0
Massachusetts
Country [2] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [2] 0 0
Ohio
Country [3] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [3] 0 0
Pennsylvania
Country [4] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [4] 0 0
Texas
Country [5] 0 0
Italy
State/province [5] 0 0
Alessandria
Country [6] 0 0
Italy
State/province [6] 0 0
Bologna
Country [7] 0 0
Italy
State/province [7] 0 0
Firenze
Country [8] 0 0
Italy
State/province [8] 0 0
Genova
Country [9] 0 0
Italy
State/province [9] 0 0
Milano
Country [10] 0 0
Italy
State/province [10] 0 0
Pisa
Country [11] 0 0
Italy
State/province [11] 0 0
Roma
Country [12] 0 0
Spain
State/province [12] 0 0
Madrid

Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Other
Name
Murdoch Childrens Research Institute
Address
Country
Other collaborator category [1] 0 0
Other
Name [1] 0 0
Sydney Children's Hospitals Network
Address [1] 0 0
Country [1] 0 0
Other collaborator category [2] 0 0
Other
Name [2] 0 0
Baylor College of Medicine
Address [2] 0 0
Country [2] 0 0
Other collaborator category [3] 0 0
Other
Name [3] 0 0
Boston Children's Hospital
Address [3] 0 0
Country [3] 0 0
Other collaborator category [4] 0 0
Other
Name [4] 0 0
The Cleveland Clinic
Address [4] 0 0
Country [4] 0 0
Other collaborator category [5] 0 0
Other
Name [5] 0 0
University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas
Address [5] 0 0
Country [5] 0 0
Other collaborator category [6] 0 0
Other
Name [6] 0 0
Royal Children's Hospital
Address [6] 0 0
Country [6] 0 0
Other collaborator category [7] 0 0
Other
Name [7] 0 0
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Address [7] 0 0
Country [7] 0 0
Other collaborator category [8] 0 0
Other
Name [8] 0 0
Queensland Children's Hospital
Address [8] 0 0
Country [8] 0 0
Other collaborator category [9] 0 0
Other
Name [9] 0 0
Perth Children's Hospital
Address [9] 0 0
Country [9] 0 0
Other collaborator category [10] 0 0
Other
Name [10] 0 0
Women and Children's Hospital
Address [10] 0 0
Country [10] 0 0
Other collaborator category [11] 0 0
Other
Name [11] 0 0
Istituto Giannina Gaslini
Address [11] 0 0
Country [11] 0 0
Other collaborator category [12] 0 0
Government body
Name [12] 0 0
Flinders Medical Centre
Address [12] 0 0
Country [12] 0 0

Ethics approval
Ethics application status

Summary
Brief summary
There is considerable evidence that most general anaesthetics modulate brain development in animal studies. The impact is greater with longer durations of exposure and in younger animals. There is great controversy over whether or not these animal data are relevant to human clinical scenarios.

The changes seen in preclinical studies are greatest with GABA agonists and NMDA antagonists such as volatile anaesthetics (eg sevoflurane), propofol, midazolam, ketamine, and nitrous oxide. There is less evidence for an effect with opioid (such as remifentanil) or with alpha 2 agonists (such as dexmedetomidine).

Some, but not all, human cohort studies show an association between exposure to anaesthesia in infancy or early childhood and later changes in cognitive tests, school performance or risk of developing neurodevelopmental disorders. The evidence is weak due to possible confounding.

A recent well designed cohort study (the PANDA study) comparing young children that had hernia repair to their siblings found no evidence for a difference in a range of detailed neuropsychological tests. In that study most children were exposed to up to two hours of anaesthesia. The only trial (the GAS trial) has compared children having hernia repair under regional or general anesthesia and has found no evidence for a difference in neurodevelopment when tested at two years of age. The GAS and PANDA studies confirm the animal data that short exposure is unlikely to cause any neurodevelopmental impact.

The impact of longer exposures is still unknown. In humans the strongest evidence for an association between surgery and poor neurodevelopmental outcome is in infants having major surgery. However, this is also the group where confounding is most likely.

The aim of our study is to see if a new combination of anaesthetic drugs results in a better long-term developmental outcome than the current standard of care for children having anaesthesia expected to last 2 hours or longer.

Children will be randomised to receive either a low dose sevoflurane/remifentanil/dexmedetomidine or standard dose sevoflurane anaesthetic.

They will receive a neurodevelopmental assessment at 3 years of age to assess global cognitive function.
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03089905
Trial related presentations / publications
Public notes

Contacts
Principal investigator
Name 0 0
Andrew J Davidson, MD
Address 0 0
Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Fax 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for public queries
Name 0 0
Address 0 0
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Fax 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for scientific queries



Summary Results

For IPD and results data, please see https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03089905