Trial Review

Did you know?

The ANZCTR now automatically displays published trial results and simplifies the addition of trial documents such as unpublished protocols and statistical analysis plans.

These enhancements will offer a more comprehensive view of trials, regardless of whether their results are positive, negative, or inconclusive.

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov

For full trial details, please see the original record at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02202434




Registration number
NCT02202434
Ethics application status
Date submitted
21/07/2014
Date registered
29/07/2014
Date last updated
17/12/2021

Titles & IDs
Public title
Safety and Efficacy Study of Lotus Valve for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Scientific title
REPRISE III: Repositionable Percutaneous Replacement of Stenotic Aortic Valve Through Implantation of Lotus™ Valve System - Randomized Clinical Evaluation
Secondary ID [1] 0 0
S2282
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Trial acronym
REPRISE III
Linked study record

Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Aortic Stenosis 0 0
Condition category
Condition code
Cardiovascular 0 0 0 0
Diseases of the vasculature and circulation including the lymphatic system

Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Devices - Lotus Valve System
Treatment: Devices - CoreValve/Evolut R Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement System
Treatment: Devices - LOTUS Edge Valve System

Experimental: Lotus Valve System - Randomized - Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with Lotus Valve System

Active comparator: CoreValve TAVR System - Randomized - Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with CoreValve/Evolut R Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement System

Experimental: Lotus Valve Sytem - Single-arm 21mm Cohort - Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with 21mm Lotus Valve System

Experimental: Lotus Valve System - Single-arm Continued Access Cohort - Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with Lotus Valve System

Experimental: Lotus Valve System - Single-arm Roll-in Cohort - Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with Lotus Valve System

Experimental: LOTUS Edge Valve System - Single-arm Edge Nested Registry - Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with 23mm, 25mm and 27mm LOTUS Edge Valve System.


Treatment: Devices: Lotus Valve System
Procedure: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)

Treatment: Devices: CoreValve/Evolut R Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement System
Procedure: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)

Treatment: Devices: LOTUS Edge Valve System
Procedure: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)
Intervention code [1] 0 0
Treatment: Devices
Comparator / control treatment
Control group

Outcomes
Primary outcome [1] 0 0
Percentage of Participants With Events Included in the Primary Safety Endpoint
Timepoint [1] 0 0
30 days following procedure
Primary outcome [2] 0 0
Percentage of Participants With Events Included in the Primary Effectiveness Endpoint
Timepoint [2] 0 0
1 year following procedure
Secondary outcome [1] 0 0
Percentage of Participants With Moderate or Greater Paravalvular Aortic Regurgitation
Timepoint [1] 0 0
1 year following procedure

Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1. Subject has documented calcific, severe native aortic stenosis with an initial aortic valve area (AVA) of =1.0 cm2 (or AVA index of =0.6 cm2/m2) and a mean pressure gradient >40 mm Hg or jet velocity >4.0 m/s, as measured by echocardiography and/or invasive hemodynamics
2. Subject has a documented aortic annulus size of =18 mm and =29 mm based on the center's assessment of pre-procedure diagnostic imaging (and confirmed by the Case Review Committee [CRC]) and, for the randomized cohort, is deemed treatable with an available size of both test and control device. For the U.S. Continued Access Study cohort the acceptable aortic annulus size is =20 mm and =27 mm.
3. Subject has symptomatic aortic valve stenosis with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class = II
4. There is agreement by the heart team (which must include a site investigator interventionalist and a site investigator cardiac surgeon) that subject is at high or extreme operative risk for surgical valve replacement (see note below for definitions of extreme and high risk, the required level of surgical assessment, and CRC confirmation) and that TAVR is appropriate. Additionally, subject has at least one of the following.

* Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score =8% -OR-
* If STS <8, subject has at least one of the following conditions: Hostile chest, porcelain aorta, severe pulmonary hypertension (>60 mmHg), prior chest radiation therapy, coronary artery bypass graft(s) at risk with re-operation, severe lung disease (need for supplemental oxygen, forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] <50% of predicted, diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide [DLCO] <60%, or other evidence of severe pulmonary dysfunction), neuromuscular disease that creates risk for mechanical ventilation or rehabilitation after surgical aortic valve replacement, orthopedic disease that creates risk for rehabilitation after surgical aortic valve replacement, Childs Class A or B liver disease (subjects with Childs Class C disease are not eligible for inclusion in this trial), frailty as indicated by at least one of the following: 5-meter walk >6 seconds, Katz Assessment of Daily Living (Katz ADL) score of 3/6 or less, body mass index <21, wheelchair bound, unable to live independently, age =90 years, other evidence that subject is at high or extreme risk for surgical valve replacement (CRC must confirm agreement with site heart team that subject meets high or extreme risk definition)
5. Heart team (which must include a cardiac interventionalist and an experienced cardiac surgeon) assessment that the subject is likely to benefit from valve replacement.
6. Subject (or legal representative) understands the study requirements and the treatment procedures, and provides written informed consent.
7. Subject, family member, and/or legal representative agree(s) and subject is capable of returning to the study hospital for all required scheduled follow up visits.

Note: Extreme operative risk and high operative risk are defined as follows: Extreme Operative Risk: Predicted operative mortality or serious, irreversible morbidity risk =50% at 30 days; High Operative Risk: Predicted operative mortality or serious, irreversible morbidity risk =15% at 30 days. Risk of operative mortality and morbidity must be assessed via an in-person evaluation by a center cardiac surgeon and must be confirmed by the CRC (which must include an experienced cardiac surgeon).
Minimum age
No limit
Maximum age
No limit
Sex
Both males and females
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Key exclusion criteria
1. Subject has a congenital unicuspid or bicuspid aortic valve.
2. Subject has had an acute myocardial infarction (MI) within 30 days prior to the index procedure (defined as Q-wave MI or non-Q-wave MI with total creatine kinase (CK) elevation = twice normal in the presence of creatine kinase-myoglobin band (CK-MB) elevation and/or troponin elevation).
3. Subject has had a cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack within the past 6 months prior to study enrollment.
4. Subject has end-stage renal disease or has glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <20 (based on Cockcroft-Gault formula).
5. Subject has a pre-existing prosthetic aortic or mitral valve.
6. Subject has severe (4+) aortic, tricuspid, or mitral regurgitation.
7. Subject has a need for emergency surgery for any reason.
8. Subject has a history of endocarditis within 6 months of index procedure or evidence of an active systemic infection or sepsis.
9. Subject has echocardiographic evidence of new intra-cardiac mass, vegetation or intraventricular or paravalvular thrombus requiring intervention.
10. Subject has (hemoglobin) Hgb <9 g/dL, platelet count <50,000 cells/mm3 or >700,000 cells/mm3, or white blood cell count <1,000 cells/mm3.
11. Subject requires chronic anticoagulation therapy after the implant procedure and cannot be treated with warfarin (other anticoagulants are not permitted in the first month) for at least 1 month concomitant with either aspirin or clopidogrel.
12. Subject has had a gastrointestinal bleed requiring hospitalization or transfusion within the past 3 months, or has other clinically significant bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy that would preclude treatment with required antiplatelet regimen, or will refuse transfusions.
13. Subject has known hypersensitivity to contrast agents that cannot be adequately pre-medicated, or has known hypersensitivity to aspirin, all P2Y12 inhibitors, heparin, nickel, tantalum, titanium, or polyurethanes.
14. Subject has a life expectancy of less than 12 months due to non-cardiac, comorbid conditions based on the assessment of the investigator at the time of enrollment.
15. Subject has hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.
16. Subject has any therapeutic invasive cardiac or vascular procedure within 30 days prior to the index procedure (except for balloon aortic valvuloplasty or pacemaker implantation, which are allowed).
17. Subject has untreated coronary artery disease, which in the opinion of the treating physician is clinically significant and requires revascularization.
18. Subject has severe left ventricular dysfunction with ejection fraction <20%.
19. Subject is in cardiogenic shock or has hemodynamic instability requiring inotropic support or mechanical support devices.
20. Subject has severe vascular disease that would preclude safe access (e.g., aneurysm with thrombus that cannot be crossed safely, marked tortuosity, significant narrowing of the abdominal aorta, severe unfolding of the thoracic aorta, or symptomatic carotid or vertebral disease).
21. Subject has thick (>5 mm) protruding or ulcerated atheroma in the aortic arch
22. Subject has arterial access that is not acceptable for the test and control device delivery systems as defined in the device Instructions For Use.
23. Subject has current problems with substance abuse (e.g., alcohol, etc.).
24. Subject is participating in another investigational drug or device study that has not reached its primary endpoint.
25. Subject has untreated conduction system disorder (e.g., Type II second degree atrioventricular block) that in the opinion of the treating physician is clinically significant and requires a pacemaker implantation. Enrollment is permissible after permanent pacemaker implantation.
26. Subject has severe incapacitating dementia.

Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Who is / are masked / blinded?



Intervention assignment
Parallel
Other design features
Phase
Not applicable
Type of endpoint/s
Statistical methods / analysis

Recruitment
Recruitment status
Stopped early
Data analysis
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Other reasons
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
22/09/2014
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Actual
21/05/2021
Sample size
Target
Accrual to date
Final
1425
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
QLD,VIC
Recruitment hospital [1] 0 0
The Prince Charles Hospital - Chermside
Recruitment hospital [2] 0 0
Monash Medical Centre - Clayton
Recruitment postcode(s) [1] 0 0
4032 - Chermside
Recruitment postcode(s) [2] 0 0
3168 - Clayton
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [1] 0 0
Arizona
Country [2] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [2] 0 0
California
Country [3] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [3] 0 0
District of Columbia
Country [4] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [4] 0 0
Florida
Country [5] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [5] 0 0
Georgia
Country [6] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [6] 0 0
Illinois
Country [7] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [7] 0 0
Indiana
Country [8] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [8] 0 0
Kansas
Country [9] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [9] 0 0
Maryland
Country [10] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [10] 0 0
Massachusetts
Country [11] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [11] 0 0
Michigan
Country [12] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [12] 0 0
Minnesota
Country [13] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [13] 0 0
Missouri
Country [14] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [14] 0 0
New Jersey
Country [15] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [15] 0 0
New York
Country [16] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [16] 0 0
North Carolina
Country [17] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [17] 0 0
Ohio
Country [18] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [18] 0 0
Oregon
Country [19] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [19] 0 0
Pennsylvania
Country [20] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [20] 0 0
Texas
Country [21] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [21] 0 0
Virginia
Country [22] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [22] 0 0
Washington
Country [23] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [23] 0 0
Wisconsin
Country [24] 0 0
Canada
State/province [24] 0 0
British Columbia
Country [25] 0 0
Canada
State/province [25] 0 0
Quebec
Country [26] 0 0
France
State/province [26] 0 0
Midi-Pyrenees
Country [27] 0 0
France
State/province [27] 0 0
Toulouse
Country [28] 0 0
Germany
State/province [28] 0 0
Saxony
Country [29] 0 0
Germany
State/province [29] 0 0
Hamburg
Country [30] 0 0
Netherlands
State/province [30] 0 0
Rotterdam

Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Name
Boston Scientific Corporation
Address
Country

Ethics approval
Ethics application status

Summary
Brief summary
The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Lotus™ Valve System and LOTUS Edge™ Valve System for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in symptomatic subjects with calcific, severe native aortic stenosis who are considered at extreme or high risk for surgical valve replacement.
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02202434
Trial related presentations / publications
Rizik DG, Rajagopal V, Makkar RR, Bajwa T, Kleiman NS, Linke A, Kereiakes DJ, Waksman R, Thourani VH, Stoler RC, Mishkel GJ, Iyer VS, Buchbinder M, Gotberg M, Bjursten H, Allocco DJ, Reardon MJ. Long-term Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With the Lotus Valve vs CoreValve/EvolutR: A Secondary Analysis of the REPRISE III Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Oct 3;5(10):e2238792. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.38792.
Goel K, O'Leary JM, Barker CM, Levack M, Rajagopal V, Makkar RR, Bajwa T, Kleiman N, Linke A, Kereiakes DJ, Waksman R, Allocco DJ, Rizik DG, Reardon MJ, Lindman BR. Clinical Implications of Physical Function and Resilience in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Sep;9(17):e017075. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017075. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
Meduri CU, Kereiakes DJ, Rajagopal V, Makkar RR, O'Hair D, Linke A, Waksman R, Babliaros V, Stoler RC, Mishkel GJ, Rizik DG, Iyer VS, Schindler J, Allocco DJ, Meredith IT, Feldman TE, Reardon MJ. Pacemaker Implantation and Dependency After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in the REPRISE III Trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Nov 5;8(21):e012594. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012594. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
Reardon MJ, Feldman TE, Meduri CU, Makkar RR, O'Hair D, Linke A, Kereiakes DJ, Waksman R, Babliaros V, Stoler RC, Mishkel GJ, Rizik DG, Iyer VS, Gleason TG, Tchetche D, Rovin JD, Lhermusier T, Carrie D, Hodson RW, Allocco DJ, Meredith IT; Reprise III Investigators. Two-Year Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Mechanical vs Self-expanding Valves: The REPRISE III Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Mar 1;4(3):223-229. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.0091.
Asch FM, Vannan MA, Singh S, Khandheria B, Little SH, Allocco DJ, Meredith IT, Feldman TE, Reardon MJ, Weissman NJ. Hemodynamic and Echocardiographic Comparison of the Lotus and CoreValve Transcatheter Aortic Valves in Patients With High and Extreme Surgical Risk: An Analysis From the REPRISE III Randomized Controlled Trial. Circulation. 2018 Jun 12;137(24):2557-2567. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.034129. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
Feldman TE, Reardon MJ, Rajagopal V, Makkar RR, Bajwa TK, Kleiman NS, Linke A, Kereiakes DJ, Waksman R, Thourani VH, Stoler RC, Mishkel GJ, Rizik DG, Iyer VS, Gleason TG, Tchetche D, Rovin JD, Buchbinder M, Meredith IT, Gotberg M, Bjursten H, Meduri C, Salinger MH, Allocco DJ, Dawkins KD. Effect of Mechanically Expanded vs Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Mortality and Major Adverse Clinical Events in High-Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis: The REPRISE III Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018 Jan 2;319(1):27-37. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.19132.
Public notes

Contacts
Principal investigator
Name 0 0
David Rizik, MD
Address 0 0
Scottsdale Healthcare - Shea
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Fax 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for public queries
Name 0 0
Address 0 0
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Fax 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for scientific queries



Summary Results

For IPD and results data, please see https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02202434