Trial Review

Did you know?

The ANZCTR now automatically displays published trial results and simplifies the addition of trial documents such as unpublished protocols and statistical analysis plans.

These enhancements will offer a more comprehensive view of trials, regardless of whether their results are positive, negative, or inconclusive.

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov

For full trial details, please see the original record at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02167074




Registration number
NCT02167074
Ethics application status
Date submitted
12/06/2014
Date registered
18/06/2014
Date last updated
23/08/2021

Titles & IDs
Public title
Comparing a 25G EUS Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA) Device With a 20G EUS
Scientific title
A Multicenter Randomized Trial, Comparing a 25G EUS Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA) Device With a 20G EUS ProCore Fine Needle Biopsy (FNB) Device
Secondary ID [1] 0 0
ASPRO-2014-01
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Trial acronym
ASPRO
Linked study record

Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Pancreatic Masses 0 0
Lymph Nodes 0 0
Condition category
Condition code

Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Active comparator: 25G FNA needle - Patients referred for EUS-guided tissue acquisition of a pancreatic mass, lymph node, or other submucosal or undefined mass (non-pancreatic).

Active comparator: 20G ProCore FNB needle - Patients referred for EUS-guided tissue acquisition of a pancreatic mass, lymph node, or other submucosal or undefined mass (non-pancreatic).
Comparator / control treatment
Control group

Outcomes
Primary outcome [1] 0 0
Diagnostic Accuracy
Timepoint [1] 0 0
27 months
Secondary outcome [1] 0 0
Number of Participants in Whom Target Lesion Was Sampled
Timepoint [1] 0 0
1 day
Secondary outcome [2] 0 0
Presence of Vital Target Cells Per Case, Per Needle Type
Timepoint [2] 0 0
after 27 months
Secondary outcome [3] 0 0
Number of Patients With Adverse Events Per Needle Type
Timepoint [3] 0 0
27 months after procedure
Secondary outcome [4] 0 0
Diagnostic Yield of the First Needle Pass
Timepoint [4] 0 0
after 27 months
Secondary outcome [5] 0 0
On-site Pathological Evaluation Performed
Timepoint [5] 0 0
27 months

Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Patients referred for EUS-guided tissue acquisition because of a (I) pancreatic mass lesion or (II) lymph node
* Age > 18 years
* Written informed consent
* Lesion can be visualized with EUS and is =1 cm in size
Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
100 Years
Sex
Both males and females
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Key exclusion criteria
* Known bleeding disorder that cannot be sufficiently corrected with co-fact or fresh frozen plasma (FFP)
* Use of anticoagulants that cannot be discontinued in order to guarantee an INR below 1.5
* Purely cystic lesions
* Previous inclusion in the current study
* Pregnancy

Study design
Purpose of the study
Diagnosis
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s


Intervention assignment
Parallel
Other design features
Phase
NA
Type of endpoint/s
Statistical methods / analysis

Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Data analysis
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Other reasons
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
1/02/2015
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Actual
1/06/2017
Sample size
Target
Accrual to date
Final
615
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Recruitment hospital [1] 0 0
The Royal Adelaide Hospital - Adelaide
Recruitment postcode(s) [1] 0 0
- Adelaide
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [1] 0 0
California
Country [2] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [2] 0 0
Connecticut
Country [3] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [3] 0 0
New York
Country [4] 0 0
Belgium
State/province [4] 0 0
Leuven
Country [5] 0 0
France
State/province [5] 0 0
Marseille
Country [6] 0 0
Israel
State/province [6] 0 0
Tel Aviv
Country [7] 0 0
Italy
State/province [7] 0 0
Milan
Country [8] 0 0
Italy
State/province [8] 0 0
Rome
Country [9] 0 0
Japan
State/province [9] 0 0
Osaka-sayama
Country [10] 0 0
Netherlands
State/province [10] 0 0
Zuid-Holland
Country [11] 0 0
Spain
State/province [11] 0 0
Santiago De Compostela
Country [12] 0 0
Sweden
State/province [12] 0 0
Stockholm

Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Other
Name
Foundation for Liver Research
Address
Country
Other collaborator category [1] 0 0
Commercial sector/industry
Name [1] 0 0
Cook Ireland, Ltd.
Address [1] 0 0
Country [1] 0 0

Ethics approval
Ethics application status

Summary
Brief summary
The aim of this study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of two EUS-guided tissue acquisition devices; the 25G Echotip Ultra Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA) device and the 20G Echotip ProCore Fine Needle Biopsy (FNB) device.
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02167074
Trial related presentations / publications
van Riet PA, Giorgio Arcidiacono P, Petrone M, Quoc Nguyen N, Kitano M, Chang K, Larghi A, Iglesias-Garcia J, Giovannini M, van der Merwe S, Santo E, Baldaque-Silva F, Bucobo JC, Bruno MJ, Aslanian HR, Cahen DL, Farrell J. Combined versus single use 20 G fine-needle biopsy and 25 G fine-needle aspiration for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue sampling of solid gastrointestinal lesions. Endoscopy. 2020 Jan;52(1):37-44. doi: 10.1055/a-0966-8755. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
van Riet PA, Larghi A, Attili F, Rindi G, Nguyen NQ, Ruszkiewicz A, Kitano M, Chikugo T, Aslanian H, Farrell J, Robert M, Adeniran A, Van Der Merwe S, Roskams T, Chang K, Lin F, Lee JG, Arcidiacono PG, Petrone M, Doglioni C, Iglesias-Garcia J, Abdulkader I, Giovannini M, Bories E, Poizat F, Santo E, Scapa E, Marmor S, Bucobo JC, Buscaglia JM, Heimann A, Wu M, Baldaque-Silva F, Moro CF, Erler NS, Biermann K, Poley JW, Cahen DL, Bruno MJ. A multicenter randomized trial comparing a 25-gauge EUS fine-needle aspiration device with a 20-gauge EUS fine-needle biopsy device. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Feb;89(2):329-339. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.10.026. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
Public notes

Contacts
Principal investigator
Name 0 0
Marco J Bruno, MD, PhD
Address 0 0
Erasmus Medical Center
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Fax 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for public queries
Name 0 0
Address 0 0
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Fax 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for scientific queries



Summary Results

For IPD and results data, please see https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02167074