Registering a new trial?

To achieve prospective registration, we recommend submitting your trial for registration at the same time as ethics submission.

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov

For full trial details, please see the original record at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02004873




Registration number
NCT02004873
Ethics application status
Date submitted
3/12/2013
Date registered
9/12/2013
Date last updated
17/01/2018

Titles & IDs
Public title
Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study
Scientific title
Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study
Secondary ID [1] 0 0
Micra
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Trial acronym
Linked study record

Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Class I or II Indication for Implantation of a Single Chamber Ventricular Pacemaker According to ACC/AHA/HRS 2001 Guidelines and Any National Guidelines 0 0
Condition category
Condition code

Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Experimental: Micra Pacemaker Implant -

Comparator / control treatment
Control group

Outcomes
Primary outcome [1] 0 0
Major Complications
Timepoint [1] 0 0
Implant to 6 Months Post Implant
Primary outcome [2] 0 0
Pacing Capture Threshold
Timepoint [2] 0 0
6 Months Post Implant
Secondary outcome [1] 0 0
Ventricular Capture Management Threshold
Timepoint [1] 0 0
6 Months Post Implant
Secondary outcome [2] 0 0
Rate Response Operation of Micra
Timepoint [2] 0 0
3 Months and 6 Months Post Implant (combined analysis)

Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Subjects who have a Class I or II indication for implantation of a single chamber ventricular pacemaker according to ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines and any national guidelines
* Subjects who are able and willing to undergo the study requirements and are expected to be geographically stable for the duration of the follow-up.
* Subjects who are at least 18 years of age (or older, if required by local law).
Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
No limit
Sex
Both males and females
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Key exclusion criteria
* Subjects who are entirely pacemaker dependent (escape rhythm <30 bpm). (Please note: Subjects who are entirely pacemaker dependent (escape rhythm <30 bpm) can now be included in the study. Medtronic notified all sites on July 23, 2014 that the restriction against pacemaker dependent subjects was lifted, following review of the Early Performance Assessment.)
* Subject has an existing or prior pacemaker, ICD or CRT device implant.
* Subject has unstable angina pectoris or has had an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the 30 days prior to eligibility assessment.
* Subjects with current implantation of neurostimulator or any other chronically implanted device which uses current in the body. Note that a temporary pacing wire is allowed.
* Subjects with a mechanical tricuspid valve, implanted vena cava filter, or left ventricular assist device (LVAD).
* Subjects who are morbidly obese and physician believes telemetry communication of =5 inches (12.7 cm) could not be obtained with programmer head.
* Subjects whose femoral venous anatomy is unable to accommodate a 23 French introducer sheath or implant on the right side of the heart (for example, due to obstructions or severe tortuosity) in the opinion of the implanter.
* Subjects who are considered as unable to tolerate an urgent sternotomy
* Subjects with a known intolerance to Nickel-Titanium (Nitinol) Alloy.
* Subjects for whom a single dose of 1.0mg dexamethasone acetate may be contraindicated.
* Subjects with a life expectancy of less than 12- months.
* Subjects who are currently enrolled or planning to participate in a potentially confounding drug or device trial during the course of this study. Coenrollment in concurrent trials is only allowed when document pre-approval is obtained from the Medtronic study manager.
* Pregnant women, or women of child bearing potential and who are not on a reliable form of birth control.
* Subjects with exclusion criteria required by local law (e.g. age, breast feeding, etc.).

Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Allocation to intervention
Not applicable
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Who is / are masked / blinded?



Intervention assignment
Single group
Other design features
Phase
Not applicable
Type of endpoint/s
Statistical methods / analysis

Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Data analysis
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Other reasons
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Actual
Sample size
Target
Accrual to date
Final
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
QLD
Recruitment hospital [1] 0 0
Princess Alexandria Hospital - Woolloongabba
Recruitment postcode(s) [1] 0 0
- Woolloongabba
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [1] 0 0
California
Country [2] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [2] 0 0
Connecticut
Country [3] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [3] 0 0
Florida
Country [4] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [4] 0 0
Georgia
Country [5] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [5] 0 0
Iowa
Country [6] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [6] 0 0
Michigan
Country [7] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [7] 0 0
Minnesota
Country [8] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [8] 0 0
Missouri
Country [9] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [9] 0 0
New Jersey
Country [10] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [10] 0 0
New York
Country [11] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [11] 0 0
North Carolina
Country [12] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [12] 0 0
Ohio
Country [13] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [13] 0 0
Oklahoma
Country [14] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [14] 0 0
Oregon
Country [15] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [15] 0 0
Pennsylvania
Country [16] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [16] 0 0
Tennessee
Country [17] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [17] 0 0
Texas
Country [18] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [18] 0 0
Virginia
Country [19] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [19] 0 0
Wisconsin
Country [20] 0 0
Austria
State/province [20] 0 0
Linz
Country [21] 0 0
Canada
State/province [21] 0 0
Quebec
Country [22] 0 0
China
State/province [22] 0 0
Beijing
Country [23] 0 0
Czechia
State/province [23] 0 0
Praha
Country [24] 0 0
Denmark
State/province [24] 0 0
København
Country [25] 0 0
France
State/province [25] 0 0
Bordeaux
Country [26] 0 0
Greece
State/province [26] 0 0
Heraklion
Country [27] 0 0
Hungary
State/province [27] 0 0
Budapest
Country [28] 0 0
India
State/province [28] 0 0
Hyderabad
Country [29] 0 0
India
State/province [29] 0 0
New Delhi
Country [30] 0 0
Italy
State/province [30] 0 0
Pisa
Country [31] 0 0
Japan
State/province [31] 0 0
Osaka
Country [32] 0 0
Japan
State/province [32] 0 0
Shinagawa-Ku
Country [33] 0 0
Japan
State/province [33] 0 0
Tokyo
Country [34] 0 0
Japan
State/province [34] 0 0
Yokohama
Country [35] 0 0
Malaysia
State/province [35] 0 0
Kuala Lumpur
Country [36] 0 0
Netherlands
State/province [36] 0 0
Amsterdam
Country [37] 0 0
Netherlands
State/province [37] 0 0
Eindhoven
Country [38] 0 0
Netherlands
State/province [38] 0 0
Nieuwegein
Country [39] 0 0
Serbia
State/province [39] 0 0
Belgrade
Country [40] 0 0
South Africa
State/province [40] 0 0
Cape Town
Country [41] 0 0
Spain
State/province [41] 0 0
Barcelona
Country [42] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [42] 0 0
Southampton

Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Name
Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure
Address
Country

Ethics approval
Ethics application status

Summary
Brief summary
The purpose of this clinical study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Micra Transcatheter Pacing System and to assess long term performance.
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02004873
Trial related presentations / publications
Piccini JP, Cunnane R, Steffel J, El-Chami MF, Reynolds D, Roberts PR, Soejima K, Steinwender C, Garweg C, Chinitz L, Ellis CR, Stromberg K, Fagan DH, Mont L. Development and validation of a risk score for predicting pericardial effusion in patients undergoing leadless pacemaker implantation: experience with the Micra transcatheter pacemaker. Europace. 2022 Jul 21;24(7):1119-1126. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab315.
El-Chami MF, Shinn T, Bansal S, Martinez-Sande JL, Clementy N, Augostini R, Ravindran B, Sagi V, Ramanna H, Garweg C, Roberts PR, Soejima K, Stromberg K, Fagan DH, Zuniga N, Piccini JP. Leadless pacemaker implant with concomitant atrioventricular node ablation: Experience with the Micra transcatheter pacemaker. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 Mar;32(3):832-841. doi: 10.1111/jce.14881. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
Garg A, Koneru JN, Fagan DH, Stromberg K, Padala SK, El-Chami MF, Roberts PR, Piccini JP, Cheng A, Ellenbogen KA. Morbidity and mortality in patients precluded for transvenous pacemaker implantation: Experience with a leadless pacemaker. Heart Rhythm. 2020 Dec;17(12):2056-2063. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.07.035. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
Tjong FVY, Beurskens NEG, de Groot JR, Waweru C, Liu S, Ritter P, Reynolds D, Wilde AAM, Knops RE; Micra Investigators. Health-related quality of life impact of a transcatheter pacing system. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2018 Dec;29(12):1697-1704. doi: 10.1111/jce.13726. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
El-Chami MF, Al-Samadi F, Clementy N, Garweg C, Martinez-Sande JL, Piccini JP, Iacopino S, Lloyd M, Vinolas Prat X, Jacobsen MD, Ritter P, Johansen JB, Tondo C, Liu F, Fagan DH, Eakley AK, Roberts PR. Updated performance of the Micra transcatheter pacemaker in the real-world setting: A comparison to the investigational study and a transvenous historical control. Heart Rhythm. 2018 Dec;15(12):1800-1807. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.08.005. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
Okabe T, El-Chami MF, Lloyd MS, Buck B, Gornick CC, Moore JC, Augostini RS, Hummel JD. Leadless pacemaker implantation and concurrent atrioventricular junction ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 May;41(5):504-510. doi: 10.1111/pace.13312. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
Soejima K, Asano T, Ishikawa T, Kusano K, Sato T, Okamura H, Matsumoto K, Taguchi W, Stromberg K, Lande J, Kobayashi Y; Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study Group. Performance of Leadless Pacemaker in Japanese Patients vs. Rest of the World - Results From a Global Clinical Trial. Circ J. 2017 Oct 25;81(11):1589-1595. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-17-0259. Epub 2017 May 30.
Lloyd M, Reynolds D, Sheldon T, Stromberg K, Hudnall JH, Demmer WM, Omar R, Ritter P, Hummel J, Mont L, Steinwender C, Duray GZ. Rate adaptive pacing in an intracardiac pacemaker. Heart Rhythm. 2017 Feb;14(2):200-205. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.11.016. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
Reynolds D, Duray GZ, Omar R, Soejima K, Neuzil P, Zhang S, Narasimhan C, Steinwender C, Brugada J, Lloyd M, Roberts PR, Sagi V, Hummel J, Bongiorni MG, Knops RE, Ellis CR, Gornick CC, Bernabei MA, Laager V, Stromberg K, Williams ER, Hudnall JH, Ritter P; Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study Group. A Leadless Intracardiac Transcatheter Pacing System. N Engl J Med. 2016 Feb 11;374(6):533-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1511643. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
Ritter P, Duray GZ, Steinwender C, Soejima K, Omar R, Mont L, Boersma LV, Knops RE, Chinitz L, Zhang S, Narasimhan C, Hummel J, Lloyd M, Simmers TA, Voigt A, Laager V, Stromberg K, Bonner MD, Sheldon TJ, Reynolds D; Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study Group. Early performance of a miniaturized leadless cardiac pacemaker: the Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study. Eur Heart J. 2015 Oct 1;36(37):2510-9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv214. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
Ritter P, Duray GZ, Zhang S, Narasimhan C, Soejima K, Omar R, Laager V, Stromberg K, Williams E, Reynolds D; Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study Group. The rationale and design of the Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study: safety and efficacy of a novel miniaturized pacemaker. Europace. 2015 May;17(5):807-13. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv026. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
Public notes

Contacts
Principal investigator
Name 0 0
Dwight Reynolds
Address 0 0
University of Oklahoma
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Fax 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for public queries
Name 0 0
Address 0 0
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Fax 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for scientific queries



Summary Results

For IPD and results data, please see https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02004873