Did you know?

The ANZCTR now automatically displays published trial results and simplifies the addition of trial documents such as unpublished protocols and statistical analysis plans.

These enhancements will offer a more comprehensive view of trials, regardless of whether their results are positive, negative, or inconclusive.

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov

For full trial details, please see the original record at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00079066




Registration number
NCT00079066
Ethics application status
Date submitted
8/03/2004
Date registered
9/03/2004
Date last updated
4/08/2023

Titles & IDs
Public title
Cetuximab + Best Supportive Care Compared With Best Supportive Care Alone in Metastatic Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Positive Colorectal Cancer
Scientific title
A Phase III Randomized Study of Cetuximab (Erbituxâ„¢, C225) and Best Supportive Care Versus Best Supportive Care in Patients With Pretreated Metastatic Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-Positive Colorectal Carcinoma
Secondary ID [1] 0 0
CAN-NCIC-CO17
Secondary ID [2] 0 0
CO17
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Trial acronym
Linked study record

Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Colorectal Cancer 0 0
Quality of Life 0 0
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer 0 0 0 0
Bowel - Back passage (rectum) or large bowel (colon)

Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Comparator / control treatment
Control group

Outcomes
Primary outcome [1] 0 0
Overall survival
Timepoint [1] 0 0
Secondary outcome [1] 0 0
Time to progression
Timepoint [1] 0 0
Secondary outcome [2] 0 0
Objective response rate
Timepoint [2] 0 0
Secondary outcome [3] 0 0
Quality of life by European Organization for Research of the Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire -C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Timepoint [3] 0 0
Secondary outcome [4] 0 0
Health utilities by Health Utilities Index 13 (HU 13)
Timepoint [4] 0 0
Secondary outcome [5] 0 0
Economic evaluation
Timepoint [5] 0 0
Secondary outcome [6] 0 0
Safety profile
Timepoint [6] 0 0

Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

* Histologically confirmed colorectal cancer

* Metastatic disease
* Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-positive by immunochemistry
* Measurable or evaluable disease
* Not amenable to standard curative therapy

* Best supportive care is the only available option
* Must have received a prior thymidylate synthase inhibitor (e.g., fluorouracil, capecitabine, raltitrexed, or fluorouracil-uracil) in the adjuvant or metastatic setting

* Combination therapy with oxaliplatin or irinotecan allowed
* Must have failed* a prior regimen containing irinotecan and a prior regimen containing oxaliplatin for metastatic disease OR relapsed within 6 months after an adjuvant regimen containing irinotecan or oxaliplatin OR have documented unsuitability for such regimens
* No symptomatic CNS metastases NOTE: *Failure is defined as either disease progression (clinical or radiological) or intolerance to the regimen

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

Age

* 16 and over

Performance status

* ECOG 0-2

Life expectancy

* Not specified

Hematopoietic

* See Disease Characteristics
* Absolute granulocyte count = 1,500/mm^3
* Platelet count = 75,000/mm^3
* Hemoglobin = 8.0 g/dL

Hepatic

* AST and ALT = 5 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
* Bilirubin = 2.5 times ULN

Renal

* Creatinine = 1.5 times ULN

Cardiovascular

* No uncontrolled angina
* No arrhythmias
* No cardiomyopathy
* No congestive heart failure
* No myocardial infarction* within the past 6 months NOTE: *Pre-treatment ECG as only evidence of infarction is allowed

Pulmonary

* No severe restrictive lung disease
* No interstitial lung disease by chest x-ray

Other

* Not pregnant or nursing
* Negative pregnancy test
* Fertile patients must use effective contraception for 4 weeks before, during, and for 4 weeks after study treatment
* No active pathological condition that would preclude study participation
* No psychological or geographical condition that would preclude study compliance
* No other malignancy within the past 5 years except adequately treated non-melanoma skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

Biologic therapy

* No prior cetuximab
* No prior murine monoclonal antibody therapy (e.g., edrecolomab)

Chemotherapy

* See Disease Characteristics
* At least 4 weeks since prior chemotherapy and recovered
* No concurrent chemotherapy

Radiotherapy

* See Disease Characteristics
* At least 4 weeks since prior radiotherapy and recovered
* Concurrent palliative radiotherapy allowed except to index lesions

Surgery

* At least 4 weeks since prior major surgery and recovered

Other

* No prior EGFR-targeted therapy (e.g., erlotinib or gefitinib)
* More than 30 days since prior experimental therapeutic agents
* More than 4 weeks since prior investigational agents
* No concurrent enrollment in another clinical study
* No other concurrent EGFR-targeted therapy
* No other concurrent non-cytotoxic experimental agents
Minimum age
16 Years
Maximum age
120 Years
Sex
Both males and females
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Key exclusion criteria

Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Who is / are masked / blinded?



Intervention assignment
Parallel
Other design features
Phase
Phase 3
Type of endpoint/s
Statistical methods / analysis

Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Data analysis
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Other reasons
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Actual
Sample size
Target
Accrual to date
Final
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW
Recruitment hospital [1] 0 0
NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre - Camperdown
Recruitment postcode(s) [1] 0 0
1450 - Camperdown
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1] 0 0
Canada
State/province [1] 0 0
Alberta
Country [2] 0 0
Canada
State/province [2] 0 0
British Columbia
Country [3] 0 0
Canada
State/province [3] 0 0
Manitoba
Country [4] 0 0
Canada
State/province [4] 0 0
New Brunswick
Country [5] 0 0
Canada
State/province [5] 0 0
Newfoundland and Labrador
Country [6] 0 0
Canada
State/province [6] 0 0
Nova Scotia
Country [7] 0 0
Canada
State/province [7] 0 0
Ontario
Country [8] 0 0
Canada
State/province [8] 0 0
Prince Edward Island
Country [9] 0 0
Canada
State/province [9] 0 0
Quebec
Country [10] 0 0
Canada
State/province [10] 0 0
Saskatchewan

Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Other
Name
NCIC Clinical Trials Group
Address
Country
Other collaborator category [1] 0 0
Other
Name [1] 0 0
Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group
Address [1] 0 0
Country [1] 0 0

Ethics approval
Ethics application status

Summary
Brief summary
RATIONALE: Monoclonal antibodies, such as cetuximab, can target tumor cells and either kill them or deliver tumor-killing substances to them without harming normal cells. Best supportive care is the use of drugs and other treatments to improve the quality of life of patients. Combining cetuximab with best supportive care may slow the growth of the tumor and help patients live longer and more comfortably. It is not yet known whether cetuximab combined with best supportive care is more effective than best supportive care alone in treating metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor-positive colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying cetuximab and best supportive care to see how well they work compared to best supportive care alone in treating patients with metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor-positive colorectal cancer.
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00079066
Trial related presentations / publications
Gupta A, O'Callaghan CJ, Zhu L, Jonker DJ, Wong RPW, Colwell B, Moore MJ, Karapetis CS, Tebbutt NC, Shapiro JD, Tu D, Booth CM. Evaluating the Time Toxicity of Cancer Treatment in the CCTG CO.17 Trial. JCO Oncol Pract. 2023 Jun;19(6):e859-e866. doi: 10.1200/OP.22.00737. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
Au HJ, Karapetis CS, O'Callaghan CJ, Tu D, Moore MJ, Zalcberg JR, Kennecke H, Shapiro JD, Koski S, Pavlakis N, Charpentier D, Wyld D, Jefford M, Knight GJ, Magoski NM, Brundage MD, Jonker DJ. Health-related quality of life in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab: overall and KRAS-specific results of the NCIC CTG and AGITG CO.17 Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Apr 10;27(11):1822-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.6048. Epub 2009 Mar 9.
Jonker DJ, Karapetis C, Harbison C, et al.: High epiregulin (EREG) gene expression plus K-ras wild-type (WT) status as predictors of cetuximab benefit in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC): results from NCIC CTG CO.17-A phase III trial of cetuximab versus best supportive care (BSC).. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 27 (Suppl 15): A-4016, 2009.
Asmis TR, Powell E, Karapetis CS, Jonker DJ, Tu D, Jeffery M, Pavlakis N, Gibbs P, Zhu L, Dueck DA, Whittom R, Langer C, O'Callaghan CJ. Comorbidity, age and overall survival in cetuximab-treated patients with advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC)--results from NCIC CTG CO.17: a phase III trial of cetuximab versus best supportive care. Ann Oncol. 2011 Jan;22(1):118-126. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq309. Epub 2010 Jul 5.
Karapetis CS, Khambata-Ford S, Jonker DJ, O'Callaghan CJ, Tu D, Tebbutt NC, Simes RJ, Chalchal H, Shapiro JD, Robitaille S, Price TJ, Shepherd L, Au HJ, Langer C, Moore MJ, Zalcberg JR. K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 23;359(17):1757-65. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804385.
Mittmann N, Au HJ, Tu D, et al.: A prospective economic analysis of cost-effectiveness of cetuximab for metastatic colorectal cancer patients from the NCIC CTG and AGITG CO.17 trial. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 26 (Suppl 15): A-6528, 2008.
O'Callaghan CJ, Tu D, Karapetis CS, et al.: The relationship between the development of rash and clinical and quality of life outcomes in colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab in NCIC CTG CO.17. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 26 (Suppl 15): A-4130, 2008.
Jonker DJ, Karapetis CS, Moore M, et al.: Randomized phase III trial of cetuximab monotherapy plus best supportive care (BSC) versus BSC alone in patients with pretreated metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-positive colorectal carcinoma: a trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG) and the Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group (AGITG). [Abstract] American Association for Cancer Research: 98th Annual Meeting, April 14-18, 2007, Los Angeles, CA. 2007.
Jonker DJ, O'Callaghan CJ, Karapetis CS, Zalcberg JR, Tu D, Au HJ, Berry SR, Krahn M, Price T, Simes RJ, Tebbutt NC, van Hazel G, Wierzbicki R, Langer C, Moore MJ. Cetuximab for the treatment of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 15;357(20):2040-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa071834.
Loree JM, Dowers A, Tu D, Jonker DJ, Edelstein DL, Quinn H, Holtrup F, Price T, Zalcberg JR, Moore MJ, Karapetis CS, O'Callaghan CJ, Waring P, Kennecke HF, Hamilton SR, Kopetz S. Expanded Low Allele Frequency RAS and BRAF V600E Testing in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer as Predictive Biomarkers for Cetuximab in the Randomized CO.17 Trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2021 Jan 1;27(1):52-59. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-2710. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
Hay AE, Pater JL, Corn E, Han L, Camacho X, O'Callaghan C, Chong N, Bell EN, Tu D, Earle CC. Pilot study of the ability to probabilistically link clinical trial patients to administrative data and determine long-term outcomes. Clin Trials. 2019 Feb;16(1):14-17. doi: 10.1177/1740774518815653. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
Public notes

Contacts
Principal investigator
Name 0 0
Derek Jonker, MD
Address 0 0
Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Fax 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for public queries
Name 0 0
Address 0 0
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Fax 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for scientific queries



Summary Results

For IPD and results data, please see https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00079066