Did you know?

The ANZCTR now automatically displays published trial results and simplifies the addition of trial documents such as unpublished protocols and statistical analysis plans.

These enhancements will offer a more comprehensive view of trials, regardless of whether their results are positive, negative, or inconclusive.

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov

For full trial details, please see the original record at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00070655




Registration number
NCT00070655
Ethics application status
Date submitted
6/10/2003
Date registered
9/10/2003
Date last updated
6/04/2011

Titles & IDs
Public title
Evaluating the Use of SR34006 Compared to Warfarin or Acenocoumarol in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation (AMADEUS)
Scientific title
The AMADEUS Trial, A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, Assessor Blind, Non-inferiority Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Once-weekly Subcutaneous Idraparinux (SR34006) With Adjusted-dose Oral Vitamin-K Antagonists in the Prevention of Thromboembolic Events in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
Secondary ID [1] 0 0
SR34006
Secondary ID [2] 0 0
EFC5134
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Trial acronym
Linked study record

Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Atrial Fibrillation 0 0
Condition category
Condition code
Cardiovascular 0 0 0 0
Other cardiovascular diseases

Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Comparator / control treatment
Control group

Outcomes
Primary outcome [1] 0 0
Composite of all strokes and non-CNS systemic embolism.
Timepoint [1] 0 0
Secondary outcome [1] 0 0
Separate components of the primary study outcome.
Timepoint [1] 0 0

Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* ECG-documented atrial fibrillation (AF) and an indication for long-term vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy based on the presence of at least one of the following risk factors:

1. previous ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA) or systemic embolism
2. hypertension requiring drug treatment
3. left ventricular dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction <45% or symptomatic congestive heart failure)
4. age >75 years
5. age between 65-75 years plus diabetes mellitus, or
6. age between 65-75 years plus symptomatic coronary artery disease (previous myocardial infarction (MI) or angina pectoris)
* Written informed consent
Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
No limit
Sex
Both males and females
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Key exclusion criteria
* Legal lower age limitations (country specific)
* Indication for VKA other than AF, including prosthetic heart valves, venous thromboembolism, and planned cardioversion
* Transient AF caused by a reversible disorder
* Active bleeding or high risk of bleeding
* Recent (<15 days) or anticipated invasive procedures with potential for uncontrolled bleeding, including major surgery
* Participation in another pharmacotherapeutic study within the prior 30 days
* Creatinine clearance <10 mL/min, severe hepatic disease, or bacterial endocarditis
* Uncontrolled hypertension: systolic blood pressure > 180 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure > 110 mm Hg
* Pregnancy or childbearing potential without proper contraceptive measures
* Breastfeeding
* Any other contraindication listed in the labeling of warfarin or acenocoumarol

Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Who is / are masked / blinded?



Intervention assignment
Other design features
Phase
Phase 3
Type of endpoint/s
Statistical methods / analysis

Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Data analysis
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Other reasons
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Actual
Sample size
Target
Accrual to date
Final
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Recruitment hospital [1] 0 0
- Bondi Junction, Cairns, Camperdown, Miranda, Perth
Recruitment hospital [2] 0 0
Concord Repartiation General Hospital - Concord
Recruitment hospital [3] 0 0
- South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria
Recruitment postcode(s) [1] 0 0
- Bondi Junction, Cairns, Camperdown, Miranda, Perth
Recruitment postcode(s) [2] 0 0
- Concord
Recruitment postcode(s) [3] 0 0
- South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [1] 0 0
Alabama
Country [2] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [2] 0 0
Arizona
Country [3] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [3] 0 0
California
Country [4] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [4] 0 0
Colorado
Country [5] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [5] 0 0
Florida
Country [6] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [6] 0 0
Indiana
Country [7] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [7] 0 0
Louisiana
Country [8] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [8] 0 0
Massachusetts
Country [9] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [9] 0 0
New Mexico
Country [10] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [10] 0 0
New York
Country [11] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [11] 0 0
North Carolina
Country [12] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [12] 0 0
Oregon
Country [13] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [13] 0 0
Rhode Island
Country [14] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [14] 0 0
Texas
Country [15] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [15] 0 0
Utah
Country [16] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [16] 0 0
Virginia
Country [17] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [17] 0 0
Washington
Country [18] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [18] 0 0
Wisconsin
Country [19] 0 0
Canada
State/province [19] 0 0
Alberta
Country [20] 0 0
Canada
State/province [20] 0 0
British Columbia
Country [21] 0 0
Canada
State/province [21] 0 0
Newfoundland and Labrador
Country [22] 0 0
Canada
State/province [22] 0 0
Quebec
Country [23] 0 0
Canada
State/province [23] 0 0
Saskatchewan
Country [24] 0 0
Denmark
State/province [24] 0 0
Faaborg, Fredericia, Frederiksberg, Frederikshavn, Hellerup
Country [25] 0 0
Denmark
State/province [25] 0 0
Herlev, Hillerod, Holstebro, Horsens, Kalundborg, Kobenhavn
Country [26] 0 0
Denmark
State/province [26] 0 0
Kolding, Nykobing Mors, Odense, Skive, Svendborg
Country [27] 0 0
France
State/province [27] 0 0
Bourg En Bresse, Dreux, Lille, Marseille, Maubeuge, Mulhouse
Country [28] 0 0
France
State/province [28] 0 0
Nantes, Nice, Paris, Poitiers, Rennes, Saint Denis
Country [29] 0 0
France
State/province [29] 0 0
Saint-Etienne, Toulouse
Country [30] 0 0
Italy
State/province [30] 0 0
Cremona
Country [31] 0 0
Italy
State/province [31] 0 0
Merate, Milano, Padova, Pavia, Piacenza, Reggio Emilia
Country [32] 0 0
Italy
State/province [32] 0 0
Milano
Country [33] 0 0
Italy
State/province [33] 0 0
Parma
Country [34] 0 0
Italy
State/province [34] 0 0
Rimini
Country [35] 0 0
Italy
State/province [35] 0 0
Torino, Treviso
Country [36] 0 0
Italy
State/province [36] 0 0
Varese
Country [37] 0 0
Netherlands
State/province [37] 0 0
Almelo, Amersfoort, Breda, Boxmeer, Delft, Dordrecht
Country [38] 0 0
Netherlands
State/province [38] 0 0
Eindhoven, Enschede, Gorinchem, Gouda, Groningen, Harderwijk
Country [39] 0 0
Netherlands
State/province [39] 0 0
Heerlen, Hilversum, Rotterdam, Sneek, Spijkenisse, Tiel
Country [40] 0 0
Netherlands
State/province [40] 0 0
Maastricht
Country [41] 0 0
New Zealand
State/province [41] 0 0
Auckland, Christchurch, Hastings
Country [42] 0 0
Poland
State/province [42] 0 0
Kielce, Krakow, Opole, Plock, Siedlce, Warszawa, Wroclaw
Country [43] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [43] 0 0
Cardiff
Country [44] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [44] 0 0
Exeter, Dundee, Glasgow, Merseyside, Wirral
Country [45] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [45] 0 0
Glasgow
Country [46] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [46] 0 0
Newscastle Upon Tyne
Country [47] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [47] 0 0
Wolverhampton

Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Name
Sanofi
Address
Country

Ethics approval
Ethics application status

Summary
Brief summary
This trial will include patients who have a heart condition called atrial fibrillation. Atrial fibrillation is an abnormal rhythm (irregular beat) in the heart. Patients with atrial fibrillation have an increased chance for a blood clot to form in the heart and move to other blood vessels in the body and cause obstruction. This obstruction may damage tissue. For example, a blood clot plugging a vessel in the brain could cause a stroke. Therefore, patients with atrial fibrillation may be given anticoagulant (blood-thinning) tablets such as warfarin or acenocoumarol.

The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of a new injectable anticoagulant drug that is administered once weekly, SR34006 with warfarin or acenocoumarol tablets.

Assignment to either SR34006 Injection or vitamin K antagonist (warfarin or acenocoumarol) tablets will be purely by chance and will be known by both patients and their doctors.
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00070655
Trial related presentations / publications
Ding WY, Lip GYH, Shantsila A. Relationship between Chronic Kidney Disease, Time-in-Therapeutic Range, and Adverse Outcomes in Atrial Fibrillation: A post hoc Analysis from the AMADEUS Trial. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2022;51(1):29-35. doi: 10.1159/000517608. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
Prins MH, Guillemin I, Gilet H, Gabriel S, Essers B, Raskob G, Kahn SR. Scoring and psychometric validation of the Perception of Anticoagulant Treatment Questionnaire (PACT-Q). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009 Apr 7;7:30. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-7-30.
Amadeus Investigators; Bousser MG, Bouthier J, Buller HR, Cohen AT, Crijns H, Davidson BL, Halperin J, Hankey G, Levy S, Pengo V, Prandoni P, Prins MH, Tomkowski W, Torp-Pedersen C, Wyse DG. Comparison of idraparinux with vitamin K antagonists for prevention of thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2008 Jan 26;371(9609):315-21. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60168-3. Erratum In: Lancet. 2008 Dec 13;372(9655):2022.. Thorp-Pedersen, C [corrected to Torp-Pedersen, C].
Public notes

Contacts
Principal investigator
Name 0 0
ICD CSD
Address 0 0
Sanofi
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Fax 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for public queries
Name 0 0
Address 0 0
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Fax 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for scientific queries



Summary Results

For IPD and results data, please see https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00070655