Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
Please note that the ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1:00pm until 2:30pm (AEST) on Thursday 5th June for website maintenance.
Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data. Thank you and apologies for any inconvenience caused.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12625000397415p
Ethics application status
Submitted, not yet approved
Date submitted
15/04/2025
Date registered
2/05/2025
Date last updated
2/05/2025
Date data sharing statement initially provided
2/05/2025
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Use of Dynamic 3D X-Ray in the Evaluation of Acromioclavicular Joint (ACJ) Dislocations
Query!
Scientific title
Ability to Detect Acromioclavicular Joint (ACJ) Dislocations using Dynamic 3D Stress X-Ray compared to 2D Alexander View X-Ray in the Outpatient Orthopaedic Department
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
314173
0
Nil Known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation
337026
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Musculoskeletal
333479
333479
0
0
Query!
Other muscular and skeletal disorders
Query!
Injuries and Accidents
333611
333611
0
0
Query!
Other injuries and accidents
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Dynamic 3D stress x-rays of bilateral shoulders using a twin robotic x-ray scanner (Multitom Rax, Siemens Healthcare), performed in the Princess Alexandra Hospital (PAH) orthopaedic outpatient setting at an initial appointment that is less than 3-weeks since time of injury. Following inclusion and at an outpatient appointment less than 3-weeks since time of injury, patient's will have history and clinical examination of the shoulders recorded by an orthopaedic fellow or consultant trained in the methods of the study, at this appointment they will also have a 3D stress and 3D non-stress x-ray of both shoulders (4 x-rays in total, 2 X-rays per shoulder) using the Multitom RAX scanner as part of the intervention. These images are expected to take no more than 30-minutes in total and will be performed by a trained radiographer who is both trained in the methods of the study and operation of the Multitom RAX scanner. The order of images will be at the discretion of the radiographer based on factors such as machine availability and work-flow.
All patient's will be included in the intervention and comparator groups using a crossover method, with comparator images (2D Alexander view x-ray) taken immediately before or after the intervention images. Repeat images at subsequent outpatient appointments will not be performed for the purpose of this study.
All images will then be reviewed by a radiology fellow or consultant who is trained in the methods of the study.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
330776
0
Diagnosis / Prognosis
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
For all imaging modalities, the patient's reported injured shoulder will be compared to their uninjured shoulder in order to assess the presence or absence of vertical and horizontal ACJ instability.
Presence or absence of vertical and horizontal ACJ instability on 2D Alexander view x-ray (gold standard) will be used to compare to the results of dynamic 3D stress x-ray of the shoulder within patients, using a crossover method
Patient reported outcome measures including visual analog scale (VAS) for pain; disability of the arm, shoulder and hand score (DASH); and oxford shoulder instability score (OSIS) will be recorded using patient completed questionnaires at first appointment following inclusion, 6-weeks, 3-months, 6-months, and 1-year post shoulder injury.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
341123
0
Presence of occult hotizontal / vertical ACJ instability not evident on plain films
Query!
Assessment method [1]
341123
0
Assessed by displacement of the clavicle relative to the acromion on dynamic 3D X-ray stress view and Alexander view, using the circles technique
Query!
Timepoint [1]
341123
0
At initial presentation to orthopaedic outpatient clinic
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
341124
0
Rockwood classification of ACJ injury
Query!
Assessment method [2]
341124
0
Determined based on combined radiographic findings (vertical and horizontal displacement on dynamic 3D X-ray stress view and Alexander view X-rays) using the circles technique
Query!
Timepoint [2]
341124
0
At initial presentation to orthopaedic outpatient clinic
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
446365
0
Difference in sensitivity between 3D stress x-ray and Alexander view x-ray for detection of ACJ instability
Query!
Assessment method [1]
446365
0
Calculated by comparing detection rates of ACJ instability between dynamic 3D X-ray stress view and Alexander view X-ray
Query!
Timepoint [1]
446365
0
At initial presentation to orthopaedic outpatient clinic
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
446366
0
Difference in specificity between 3D stress x-ray and Alexander view x-ray for detection of ACJ instability
Query!
Assessment method [2]
446366
0
Calculated by comparing detection rates of ACJ instability between dynamic 3D X-ray stress view and Alexander view X-ray
Query!
Timepoint [2]
446366
0
At initial presentation to orthopaedic outpatient clinic
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
446715
0
Patient reported shoulder pain
Query!
Assessment method [3]
446715
0
Assessed using 100mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain completed by the patient
Query!
Timepoint [3]
446715
0
At initial presentation; and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months since injury
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
446716
0
Patient reported shoulder instability
Query!
Assessment method [4]
446716
0
Assessed using the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OSIS), a validated questionnaire for shoulder instability
Query!
Timepoint [4]
446716
0
At initial presentation; and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months since injury
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
446717
0
Patient reported upper limb disability
Query!
Assessment method [5]
446717
0
Assessed using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, a validated questionnaire
Query!
Timepoint [5]
446717
0
At initial presentation; and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months since injury
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Patients 18-years-old and over, presenting to orthopaedic outpatient clinic with acute ACJ injuries with capacity to consent
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Injury >3 weeks ago
Younger than 18-years old
Pregnancy
No Capacity to consent
Claustrophobia
Inability to perform stress exam (gentle placement of hand on opposite shoulder)
History of injury to contralateral ACJ
Concomitant injury to superior shoulder suspensory complex
Rockwood type 1 or type 2 injury as determined by imaging performed by Emergency Department
Presence of metal hardware within the neck and thoracic region
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Diagnosis
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Non-randomised trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Crossover
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
6/05/2025
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
6/05/2027
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
6/05/2028
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
73
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
QLD
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
27736
0
Princess Alexandra Hospital - Woolloongabba
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
43926
0
4102 - Woolloongabba
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
318689
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
318689
0
Princess Alexandra Hospital - Metro South Health
Query!
Address [1]
318689
0
Query!
Country [1]
318689
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Andrew McBride - Orthopaedic Consultant at Princess Alexandra Hospital
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
321119
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
321119
0
Query!
Address [1]
321119
0
Query!
Country [1]
321119
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Submitted, not yet approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
317300
0
Metro South Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
317300
0
https://metrosouth.health.qld.gov.au/research/about-us/hrec
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
317300
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
317300
0
17/04/2025
Query!
Approval date [1]
317300
0
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
317300
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The ACJ is prone to injuries from falls, hits, and overuse, leading to ACJ injuries involving the three ligaments inside the shoulder. Currently patients receive CT scans and X-rays as standard of care to detect and diagnose ACJ instability. However, some findings suggest that horizontal instability is underdiagnosed using these modes of imaging, which can impact the types of treatment offered to the patient and thus negatively affect the patient’s overall outcomes. The Multitom RAX (Siemens Healthcare) is a twin robotic x-ray system which has movable arms allowing for imaging in the standing and lying position and further has the ability to compose 3D X-ray images similar to CT, whilst using lower ionising radiation doses compared to conventional CT. We postulate that 3D X-ray stress views of the ACJ could improve radiographic detection of ACJ instability and our protocol design captures this. Improvements in radiographic assessment of the condition, will benefit the patient through appropriate clinical treatment options and overall patient outcomes.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
140614
0
Dr Andrew McBride
Query!
Address
140614
0
Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Rd, Woolloongabba QLD 4102
Query!
Country
140614
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
140614
0
+61 438 030563
Query!
Fax
140614
0
Query!
Email
140614
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
140615
0
Ciaran McDonald
Query!
Address
140615
0
Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Rd, Woolloongabba QLD 4102
Query!
Country
140615
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
140615
0
+61 07 31762111
Query!
Fax
140615
0
Query!
Email
140615
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
140616
0
Ciaran McDonald
Query!
Address
140616
0
Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Rd, Woolloongabba QLD 4102
Query!
Country
140616
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
140616
0
+61 07 31762111
Query!
Fax
140616
0
Query!
Email
140616
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will the study consider sharing individual participant data?
Yes
Will there be any conditions when requesting access to individual participant data?
Persons/groups eligible to request access:
•
Researchers
Conditions for requesting access:
•
Yes, conditions apply:
•
Requires review on a case-by-case basis by the trial custodian, sponsor or data sharing committee
•
Requires a scientifically sound proposal or protocol
•
Requires approval by an ethics committee
•
Requires a data sharing agreement between data requester and trial custodian or sponsor
What individual participant data might be shared?
•
All de-identified individual participant data
What types of analyses could be done with individual participant data?
•
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses
•
Studies exploring new research questions
•
Health economic analyses
•
Studies testing whether findings can be repeated or confirmed
•
Teaching research methods or developing new statistical techniques
When can requests for individual participant data be made (start and end dates)?
From:
After completion of first data analysis
To:
A finite period of:
7
years
Where can requests to access individual participant data be made, or data be obtained directly?
•
Email of trial custodian, sponsor or committee:
[email protected]
Are there extra considerations when requesting access to individual participant data?
No
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF