Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
Please note that the ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1:00pm until 2:30pm (AEST) on Thursday 5th June for website maintenance.
Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data. Thank you and apologies for any inconvenience caused.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12625000409471p
Ethics application status
Submitted, not yet approved
Date submitted
4/04/2025
Date registered
6/05/2025
Date last updated
6/05/2025
Date data sharing statement initially provided
6/05/2025
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Schools Education Program: a cluster-randomised controlled trial investigating the efficacy of a sexual violence primary prevention program in Australian secondary schools
Query!
Scientific title
A parallel, two-arm cluster randomised controlled study of Year 9 students at 12 Australian secondary schools to evaluate the effectiveness of a sexual violence primary prevention program on students’ knowledge, attitudes and behavioural intentions.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
314121
0
NA
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Sexual violence
336937
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Public Health
333405
333405
0
0
Query!
Health promotion/education
Query!
Mental Health
333520
333520
0
0
Query!
Other mental health disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
The Schools Education Program (SEP) educational intervention aims to educate students on healthy sexual relationships and prevent sexual violence by enhancing student knowledge, attitudes and behavioural intentions.
Year 9 students in the intervention arm will receive three in-person 90-minute sessions of SEP across a seven-week period. The sessions will be delivered by trained facilitators from Laurel House, in partnership with the Tasmanian Women’s Legal Service. The sessions will be delivered during class time with two-week intervals between sessions.
Session One:
In the first session, facilitators will use small-group activities and open discussion to explore the following topics: 1) healthy relationships, including communication, boundaries, mutual respect and consent, 2) defining sexual violence, common misconceptions about sexual violence, and recognising its impact on victim-survivors, 3) gender equality and harmful stereotypes, law changes over time that have affected women’s roles, gendered societal expectations, and how these influence perceptions of sexual violence.
Session Two:
This session delves into legal aspects of consent and emerging forms of sexual violence. With expert insights from a women’s legal service lawyer, the session will explore: 1) legal definitions of consent, 2) image-based abuse, 3) non-fatal strangulation (sexual choking), stealthing and the law, 4) and guidance on accessing legal support and counselling.
Session Three:
The final session for students will focus on navigating consent, digital safety, and active bystander strategies. Using discussion and small-group scenarios, facilitators will focus on 1) building skills for clear, respectful dialogue about boundaries and mutual agreement in relationships, 2) how pornography shapes perceptions of sex, relationships, and unrealistic expectations. 3) reinforcing the serious legal consequences of accessing, sharing, or producing Child Sexual Abuse Material, and its lifelong harms to victim-survivors. 4) early warning signs and strategies to address harmful sexual behaviours, and 5) practical bystander strategies to safely challenge harmful behaviours, support potential victims, and disrupt unsafe situations.
In addition to educational sessions, there will be ‘School Student Champions’ (SSC) recruited at each school to help accelerate the diffusion of messages in the school population. Key points about the SSCs:
- Expressions of interest will be invited from students at each school to become SSCs – up to 7 SSCs per school
- Laurel House will consult with SSCs regarding any specific issues or concerns at the school
-SSCs will be given leaflets and posters of support services to display in areas of the school
-Laurel House will check-in with SSCs between sessions to gain feedback and a sense of how the sessions have been received.
Additionally, members of the school staff and parents/caregivers will be invited to attend a 2-hour educational session on consent and healthy relationships prior to the commencement of the student sessions.
The SEP intervention includes the use of available resources such as The Consent Continuum (Body Safety Australia), the Healthy Relationship Wheel (Reproductive Health National Training Center), Duluth Equality Wheel (Domestic Abuse Intervention Project), Commonwealth Consent Policy Framework (Department of Social Services), and resources adapted from The Line (Our Watch), eSafety Commissioner (Australian Government), and the It’s Time We Talked program designed by Maree Crabbe and David Corlett. Other resources and activities have been developed for SEP by Laurel House, including scenario cards, and a range of interactive, small-group activities focused on gender stereotypes, timeline of laws, identifying trusted people, and communication skills.
Adherence to the intervention will be assessed using fidelity sheets completed by facilitators delivering the sessions.
Year 9 students in the control arm will not receive the program and will instead receive their usual school curriculum.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
330717
0
Prevention
Query!
Intervention code [2]
330812
0
Behaviour
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Control comparator – Waitlist of Secondary School students (receiving usual school curriculum) with no receipt of a sexual violence primary prevention program. The control group will be offered the intervention after the intervention period has concluded, in 2026.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
340983
0
Knowledge about sexual violence including gender equality, consent, healthy relationships, and rape myths (composite primary outcome)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
340983
0
Survey designed specifically for this study
Query!
Timepoint [1]
340983
0
Baseline, immediate-post and 6-month follow-up
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
445673
0
Attitudes toward gender equality, rape myths, and empathy (composite secondary outcome)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
445673
0
Survey designed specifically for this study
Query!
Timepoint [1]
445673
0
Baseline, immediate-post, 6-month follow-up
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
445674
0
Behavioural intentions associated with consent and bystander intervention (composite secondary outcome)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
445674
0
Survey designed specifically for this study
Query!
Timepoint [2]
445674
0
Baseline, immediate-post, 6-month follow-up
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1) students attending public secondary schools in Northern Tasmania, Australia
2) students in Year 9-aged 13-15 in these schools who consent to participate in the study and
3) whose parents or caregivers of students in these schools' consent to their participation.
Query!
Minimum age
13
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
15
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1) students attending private schools
2) students who do not consent to participate, and
3) students whose parents do not consent to their participation
4) students outside Year 9.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Prevention
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Schools (clusters) will be randomised using a remote system set up by the LTU Statistics Platform. The allocation sequence will be stored on a secure server and concealed from all personnel involved in the trial. It will be created, using computer-generated random numbers, by a statistician with no link to, or contact with, any of the participating schools.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Using computer-generated random numbers, randomisation will be stratified by the following five variables:
1) Year 9 student population (size)
2) Region of Tasmania
3) Index of Relative Socio-Economic Disadvantage, by suburb and locality (IRSD)
4) Indigenous enrolment, percentage
5) Index of Community, Socio-Educational Advantage (ICSEA)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
The study results will be reported using the CONSORT guidelines for cluster RCTs. The proportion of students completing baseline, immediate-post and six-month follow-up surveys will be reported. A descriptive analysis will be used to summarise and describe the baseline characteristics (categorical or continuous variables) of the student participants, such as age, gender, sexual orientation, Indigeneity, country of birth, language spoken at home, and autism, ADHD or learning disabilities. For the quantitative outcome measures, a comparison of the intervention and control will be undertaken using SPSS or STATA to determine whether the Group 1 (treatment) mean (µ1) is greater than the Group 2 (control) mean (µ2) (H0: d = 0 versus H1: d > 0, d = µ1 - µ2) on the primary outcome of knowledge. This will be repeated for secondary outcomes e.g. attitudes and behavioural intentions. Mean differences on outcomes will be assessed across trial arm and between baseline and post, baseline and follow up and post and follow up. The comparison will be made using a one-sided t-test (alpha 0.025) with the degrees of freedom based on the total number of subjects. Estimates for differences between intervention and control (odds ratios and least squares mean differences) will be adjusted for clustering (students nested within schools) and presented alongside 95% CIs. Intention to treat analysis will be completed and any missing data will be reported and managed using listwise deletion.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
2/06/2025
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
31/01/2026
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
31/08/2026
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
180
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
TAS
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
318630
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
318630
0
Department of Social Services
Query!
Address [1]
318630
0
Query!
Country [1]
318630
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
La Trobe University
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
321056
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
321056
0
Query!
Address [1]
321056
0
Query!
Country [1]
321056
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Submitted, not yet approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
317235
0
La Trobe University Human Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
317235
0
https://www.latrobe.edu.au/researchers/research-office/ethics/human-ethics
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
317235
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
317235
0
10/01/2025
Query!
Approval date [1]
317235
0
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
317235
0
Query!
Ethics committee name [2]
317248
0
Research Application Advisory Committee, Department for Education, Children and Young People, Tasmania
Query!
Ethics committee address [2]
317248
0
research@decyp.tas.gov.au
Query!
Ethics committee country [2]
317248
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [2]
317248
0
20/02/2025
Query!
Approval date [2]
317248
0
Query!
Ethics approval number [2]
317248
0
2025 -06
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Given the prevalence of sexual violence and its harmful impacts, there is a critical need for effective primary prevention interventions targeting school settings in Australia. Currently, there is limited evidence of effective primary prevention interventions aimed at stopping sexual violence before it occurs (Our Watch, 2020). Secondary schools represent a promising setting for such efforts, as interventions can reach young people at a pivotal developmental stage—before perpetration may have begun and when norms and values are still being shaped (De Gue et al., 2014; Porat et al., 2024). Consent and healthy relationships education has the potential to prevent sexual violence by equipping students with key skills and attitudes before harmful behaviours emerge. To evaluate the impact of consent and healthy relationships education on sexual violence prevention, this study will employ a cluster-randomised controlled trial (cRCT) involving 12 secondary schools in Tasmania, Australia. Schools will be randomly allocated to either the intervention group (n=6), which will receive the three-session Schools Education Program (SEP), or a waitlist control group (n=6), which will not receive the program during the trial period. For ethical reasons, the control group will be offered the intervention in 2026 after study completion. The primary objective of this cRCT is to assess whether SEP improves Year 9 (ages 13–15) students’ knowledge of sexual violence, including gender equality, consent, healthy relationships, and rape myths. Secondary objectives include evaluating whether SEP enhances students’ attitudes toward gender equality, reduces rape myth acceptance, and increases empathy, as well as behavioural intentions related to consent and bystander intervention. A comprehensive process evaluation and realist evaluation will be conducted alongside the cRCT.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
140426
0
Prof Leesa Hooker
Query!
Address
140426
0
La Trobe University, Edwards Road, Flora Hill, Victoria 3552
Query!
Country
140426
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
140426
0
+613 5444 7984
Query!
Fax
140426
0
Query!
Email
140426
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
140427
0
Vivienne Moyle
Query!
Address
140427
0
Level 2, David Myers Building (East), La Trobe University, Plenty Road, Bundoora, Victoria 3086
Query!
Country
140427
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
140427
0
+613 9479 1443
Query!
Fax
140427
0
Query!
Email
140427
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
140428
0
Leesa Hooker
Query!
Address
140428
0
La Trobe University, Edwards Road, Flora Hill, Victoria 3552
Query!
Country
140428
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
140428
0
+613 5444 7984
Query!
Fax
140428
0
Query!
Email
140428
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will the study consider sharing individual participant data?
No
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Doc. No.
Type
Citation
Link
Email
Other Details
Attachment
24596
Study protocol
[email protected]
24597
Ethical approval
[email protected]
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF