Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
Please note that the ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1:00pm until 2:30pm (AEST) on Thursday 5th June for website maintenance.
Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data. Thank you and apologies for any inconvenience caused.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12625000415404p
Ethics application status
Not yet submitted
Date submitted
23/04/2025
Date registered
7/05/2025
Date last updated
7/05/2025
Date data sharing statement initially provided
7/05/2025
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Acceptability of the multi-jet injection technique
Query!
Scientific title
Assessing pain and acceptability of multi-jet injection in healthy volunteers
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
314052
0
Nil known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Cancer immunotherapy delivery
336799
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
333292
333292
0
0
Query!
Any cancer
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Each participant will recieve one 'multi-jet injection' intervention and one control intervention.
Multi-jet injection involves the delivery of a fluid (in this case isotonic saline) as multiple simultaneous high speed jets. The jets are small (0.2 mm or less) and travelling fast enough (>120 m/s) that they can break through the skin layers and deliver themselves to the subcutaneous or intramuscular tissue. In this study participants will recieve a multi-jet injection in the abdomen region performed by a nurse that has been trained to use a multi-jet injector. The injection will take <1 s. Pain will be measured using a 100 mm visual analogue scale ~30 seconds after and 1 day after the injections. Participants will also be asked whether they preferred the multi-jet or control intervention after both are completed (at least 5 mins after the final injection) and again 1-day after the injections. A nurse will also record the existence of any injection site reactions (redness, swelling, bleeding, or bruising) immediately after and 1 day after the injections. The investigators will also note any evidence of the fluid remaining on the skin surface, or otherwise failing to inject. The order and location (left or right side of the abdomen) of the interventions will be randomised with a break of at least 2 minutes between the interventions. The interventions will take place at a clinical trial facility within the University of Auckland (Grafton, Auckland, NZ). A 1 hour visit will be required to conduct the interventions then the participants will be asked to complete a questionnaire (via email) 24hrs after the interventions.
We will assess multi-jet injection both needle-free, where only the liquid jets themselves penetrate the skin, and 'micro-needle assisted' where the jets are formed through small microneedles. The microneedles are very short (<1 mm exposed length) 30G needles that penetrate through the epidermis, the jets formed through the hollow bore of the microneedles then penetrate into the subcutaneous fat or intramuscur layer. In both the needle-free and microneedle multi-jet injections we will inject the isotonic saline as seven simultaneous jets.
Participants will be randomly allocated into one of five groups (listed below), allowing us to study the effect of injection volume and the use of microneedles to assist the jets penetration through the epidermis.
Arm 1: Needle-free 2 mL
Arm 2: Microneedle 2 mL
Arm 3: Needle-free 4 mL
Arm 4: Microneedle 4 mL
Arm 5: Microneedle 6 mL
Query!
Intervention code [1]
330633
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Each participant will recieve a control intervention which will involve standard subcutaneous injection(s) with a 25G hypodermic needle and syringe. The control intervention will match the volume of the multi-jet injection intervention. For the 4 mL and 6 mL groups the volume exceeds the typical limit for subcutaneous delivery so the control intervention will be performed over multiple subsequent injections (2x2 mL injections in the 4 mL groups, 3x 2mL injections in the 6 mL group). When multiple injections are performed each will be injected ~1 cm away from the previous injection site. A nurse will perform all injections with each 2 mL injection performed over 30 s. Injections will be administered to the abdomen with the control and multi-jet interventions on opposite sides of the body. The side and order of interventions will be randomised.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
340883
0
Pain
Query!
Assessment method [1]
340883
0
100 mm visual analogue scale. At timepoint 1 the score will be provided in person with the participant directly indicating a position/score on the 0-100 mm scale. At timepoint 2 the position/score will be provided within a written/digital questionaire. At all timepoints the same visual analogue scale will be visible to the participants.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
340883
0
Timepoint 1: ~30 seconds post intervention, Timepoint 2: 1 day post interventions.
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
340884
0
Intervention preference (control versus multi-jet)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
340884
0
Participants will be asked which intervention they preferred, the 'control', 'multi-jet', or 'both similar'.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
340884
0
Timepoint 1: 5 minutes after the final intervention, answer provided verbally. Timepoint 2: 1 day after interventions, answer provided via written/digital questionaire.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
445342
0
Delivery success
Query!
Assessment method [1]
445342
0
Investigators will look for any evidence of injectate that was not successfully delivered into the participant. In particular, this would most likely manifest as wetness or pooling at the injection site.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
445342
0
During the intervention and the ~1minute following intevention completion.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
445343
0
Injection site reactions
Query!
Assessment method [2]
445343
0
A nurse will observe the injection site noting any signs of redness, swelling, bleeding, or bruising.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
445343
0
Timepoint 1: immediately after intervention. Timepoint 2: 1 day after the injections. At timepoint 1 the nurse will directly observe the injection site, at timepoint 2 a photograph will be taken of the injection site.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Healthy volunteers
Query!
Minimum age
20
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
60
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Needle-phobia
Clotting disorders
Carriers of communicable disease (eg. HIV)
Low body-mass index (<18.5)
Individuals who regularly inject themselves in the abdomen region (eg. diabetics)
Pregnancy
Inability to provide informed consent (eg. neurological impairment)
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Central randomisation using computer-based random number generator.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Computational random number generator.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Crossover
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Safety
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
A total of 40 participants will be recruited (8 in each of the five groups). We estimate that at this sample size we will be able to detect a difference in the mean pain score between multi-jet injection and the control of as small as 8 units (assuming alpha=0.05, beta=20%, and standard deviation of pain scores of 13 units). When examining the effect of injection volume and needle-free vs microneedle assisted multi-jet injection we expect to be able to detect a difference in the mean pain scores between groups of as low as 15 units.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/06/2026
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
28/02/2027
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
28/02/2027
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
40
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
26918
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [1]
26918
0
Auckland
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
318558
0
Self funded/Unfunded
Query!
Name [1]
318558
0
Query!
Address [1]
318558
0
Query!
Country [1]
318558
0
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
University of Auckland
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
New Zealand
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
320956
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
320956
0
Query!
Address [1]
320956
0
Query!
Country [1]
320956
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Not yet submitted
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
317158
0
Northern A Health and Disability Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
317158
0
https://ethics.health.govt.nz/about/northern-a-health-and-disability-ethics-committee/
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
317158
0
New Zealand
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
317158
0
31/07/2025
Query!
Approval date [1]
317158
0
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
317158
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Many modern medicines are very viscous and/or require large delivery volumes. This means that they must be delivered intravenously (into a vein) which is slow, expensive, and requires a hospital or clinic. For many patients this means hours spent travelling to and from clinics and receiving infusions every time they need treatment. We aim to transform the delivery of high-volume/-viscosity medicines by injecting large volumes as many small simultaneous jet injections. Jet injection is a technique that forms the liquid drug into a tiny, high-speed jet that can penetrate the skin and deliver itself. By performing many jet injections simultaneously, we can deliver very large total volumes that would have otherwise required clinic-based intravenous delivery. We aim to evaluate patient acceptability by performing injections on human volunteers. 40 volunteers will be recruited to compare a multi-jet injection to a standard injection, scoring the pain associated with both and indicating which they prefer.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
140198
0
Dr James McKeage
Query!
Address
140198
0
Auckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Level 6, 70 Symonds Street, Grafton, Auckland
Query!
Country
140198
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
140198
0
+64 9 923 3175
Query!
Fax
140198
0
Query!
Email
140198
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
140199
0
James McKeage
Query!
Address
140199
0
Auckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Level 6, 70 Symonds Street, Grafton, Auckland
Query!
Country
140199
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
140199
0
+64 9 923 3175
Query!
Fax
140199
0
Query!
Email
140199
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
140200
0
James McKeage
Query!
Address
140200
0
Auckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Level 6, 70 Symonds Street, Grafton, Auckland
Query!
Country
140200
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
140200
0
+64 9 923 3175
Query!
Fax
140200
0
Query!
Email
140200
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will the study consider sharing individual participant data?
No
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Doc. No.
Type
Citation
Link
Email
Other Details
Attachment
24654
Study protocol
[email protected]
Protocol (Extended study description) .pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF