Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12624001143516
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
4/09/2024
Date registered
20/09/2024
Date last updated
22/07/2025
Date data sharing statement initially provided
20/09/2024
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Exploring whether home-based neuromodulation can prevent the transition from acute to chronic low back pain
Query!
Scientific title
Exploring whether home-based neuromodulation can prevent the transition from acute to chronic low back pain in adults
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
312766
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Low back pain
334806
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Musculoskeletal
331365
331365
0
0
Query!
Other muscular and skeletal disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Intervention group: active transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
A trained investigator will fit the tDCS headpiece and give a detailed demonstration of how to operate the device. A checklist for set-up and operation of the device and an instructional video regarding correct headpiece positioning will be provided for use at home. Participants will then be assessed on their ability to administer and operate the device safely against checklist procedures, and if able to complete all procedures they will be permitted to continue in the trial.
Participants in the intervention group will receive 20 minutes of active tDCS on ten consecutive days. This period of tDCS is consistent with the available literature in chronic pain conditions and laboratory-based studies.
During active tDCS, stimulation with a constant current intensity of 2 mA will be applied over the motor cortex using a Soterix mini-CT Stimulator (Soterix Medical Inc.) with a coded study mode to facilitate randomisation and blinding. The current is delivered via two 5x7cm saline-soaked sponge electrodes, fitted into a custom headpiece, with the anode electrode placed over M1 contralateral to the side of worst LBP using the International 10-20 system at position C3 or C4 (according to side of pain). The reference electrode (cathode) will be placed on the side ipsilateral to pain and positioned over the supraorbital region. These positions will be set up at the initial baseline assessment, and participants will not be required to adjust them. Each day, participants will receive a single-use treatment code, which they input into the device to commence the stimulation. They will not be able to modify the settings. Participants will be instructed to sit comfortably and minimise movement throughout the session, but will be permitted to engage in activities such as reading or watching TV. Participants will keep the headpiece in position for a duration of 20 minutes until the tDCS unit turns off automatically and generates a completion code.
Adherence to the use of home based tDCS will be assessed using a digital platform (ElectraRx, Soterix Medical Inc., 2024, Woodbridge, USA) which is programmed with the treatment schedule for each participant. If a participant does not send their completion code to be entered into ElectraRx by a researcher, the platform will record the session as missed. The tDCS device usage will also be checked by accessing the “Stimulation History” on each tDCS device, which is located within the passcode-protected “Administration” menu, and recording the number of completed sessions for each participant.
The first tDCS session will be administered in the laboratory under supervision of the research team, following the baseline testing and tDCS set up described above. For the first home-based session, participants will be supervised by researchers via secure videoconferencing software (Zoom Video Communications, Inc., CA) to provide support and monitor for adverse events. All subsequent sessions will be self-administered without the research team present, and participants will be monitored throughout the two-week period via daily text messages and online questionnaires, and weekly phone calls. If a participant fails to respond for two days, they will be contacted via email or phone. Previous studies in neuropsychiatric populations have demonstrated that self-administered, home-based tDCS without supervision is well-tolerated and safe.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
329296
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Intervention code [2]
329297
0
Prevention
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Control: sham tDCS
A trained investigator will fit the tDCS headpiece and give a detailed demonstration of how to operate the device. An instructional video regarding correct headpiece positioning for use at home will be provided. Participants will then be assessed on their ability to administer and operate the device safely against checklist procedures, and if able to complete all procedures they will be permitted to continue in the trial.
Participants in the control group will receive 20 minutes of sham tDCS on ten consecutive days. During sham tDCS, stimulation will be applied over the motor cortex using a Soterix mini-CT Stimulator (Soterix Medical Inc.) with a coded study mode to facilitate randomisation and blinding. The current is delivered via two 5x7cm saline-soaked sponge electrodes. The sham condition will involve identical procedures to the active tDCS, but will only deliver a 30s “ramp up” and “ramp down” stimulation that will range between 0 and 2mA. This replicates the initial tingling sensation of active tDCS, improving the likelihood of blinding success, but is unlikely a sufficient duration to induce any appreciable modulatory effects on the brain. The remainder of the 20-minute intervention period will involve delivery of stimulation averaging no more than 0.002mA (leakage current from the stimulator).
The first tDCS session will be administered in the laboratory under supervision of the research team, following the baseline testing and tDCS set up described above. For the first home-based session, participants will be supervised by researchers via secure videoconferencing software (Zoom Video Communications, Inc., CA) to provide support and monitor for adverse events. All subsequent sessions will be self-administered without the research team present, and participants will be monitored throughout the two-week period via daily text messages and online questionnaires, and weekly phone calls. If a participant fails to respond for two days, they will be contacted via email or phone. Previous studies in neuropsychiatric populations have demonstrated that self-administered, home-based tDCS without supervision is well-tolerated and safe.
Query!
Control group
Placebo
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
339127
0
Pain intensity
Query!
Assessment method [1]
339127
0
Visual analogue scale (VAS)
Query!
Timepoint [1]
339127
0
Baseline, daily for ten days during intervention, immediately post-completion of intervention, weekly for weeks 1-12 post-completion of intervention (12 weeks/3 months is the primary timepoint)
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
339128
0
Mechanical sensitivity measured via pressure pain threshold (PPT)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
339128
0
PPTs will be measured using a pressure algometer (Somedic, 1-cm2 probe) applied over the lumbar erector spinae muscles on the painful side, and the extensor carpi radialis brevis muscle on the side contralateral to pain. Subjects will be asked to say "stop" when the sensation changes from one of pressure to pain. The point at which pressure sensation first becomes pain will be used to determine pressure pain threshold. This value will be measured and recorded at baseline and following intervention
Query!
Timepoint [2]
339128
0
Pre-intervention baseline, at intervention completion, 4-, 8-, and 12-weeks (primary timepoint) post-completion of intervention
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
342261
0
Disability
Query!
Assessment method [3]
342261
0
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Query!
Timepoint [3]
342261
0
Pre-intervention baseline, at intervention completion, 4-, 8-, and 12-weeks (primary timepoint) post-completion of intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
438650
0
Corticomotor organisation
Query!
Assessment method [1]
438650
0
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) mapping
Query!
Timepoint [1]
438650
0
Pre-intervention baseline, at intervention completion, 4-, 8-, and 12-weeks post-completion of intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
438651
0
Left/right judgement
Query!
Assessment method [2]
438651
0
Left/right judgement task using the Recognise app (NOIgroup, Adelaide, Australia)
Query!
Timepoint [2]
438651
0
Pre-intervention baseline, at intervention completion, 4-, 8-, and 12-weeks post-completion of intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
438652
0
Two point discrimination (TPD)
Query!
Assessment method [3]
438652
0
Testing will be performed over the left and right lumbar erector spinae muscles with the participant in prone. The assessor will apply the callipers (CH71 Discriminator, Baily Instruments Ltd.) until blanching of the skin, starting in an open position along a line perpendicular to the spine and 2cm lateral to the L3 spinous process. The callipers will be progressively closed by 5mm until one point is identified by the participant. The callipers will then be returned to the last width at which two points were reported by the participant and reduced by 1mm until one point is again reported. The last value at which the participant reported two points will be recorded as the descending value. This process will then be repeated, but with the callipers placed at 0mm and progressively opened by 5mm until two points are reported by the participant. Stimuli will then be delivered at the last reported one-point width and increased by 1mm until two points are again reported. This distance will be recorded as the ascending value. The TPD threshold will be determined by averaging the descending and ascending values.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
438652
0
Pre-intervention baseline, at intervention completion, 4-, 8-, and 12-weeks post-completion of intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
438653
0
Tactile localisation
Query!
Assessment method [4]
438653
0
Using graph paper as a template (i.e., hole created in each intersection of gridlines) a 3cm-spaced grid will be drawn on the participant’s lower back. The horizonal axis of the grid will be labelled from A to G, and the vertical axis 1 to 7. A photo will then be taken of the participant’s low back with the completed grid and numbering visible and provided to the participant to view on a digital tablet. For each of 20 trials, a randomised grid point will be touched by the researcher using a cotton bud, and the participant will be asked to identify the corresponding location on the tablet within 5 seconds. The error will be measured and recorded after each trial, defined as the Euclidean distance (millimetres) between the true and perceived location of the stimulus, and the average score calculated for the 20 trials.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
438653
0
Pre-intervention baseline, at intervention completion, 4-, 8-, and 12-weeks post-completion of intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
438654
0
Auditory localisation
Query!
Assessment method [5]
438654
0
Participants will stand in a relaxed position with their eyes closed and be asked to detect the location of an auditory ‘click’. The researcher will use a mechanical clicker to deliver 20 stimuli in a randomised order in one of four locations: in line with lumbar erector spinae muscles or lateral to the edge of the torso (~level of L3, clicker ~4cm away from the skin), either to the left or right of the participants’ body. Participants will be given 5 seconds to respond by indicating the perceived location in space of the stimuli, and an interstimulus interval of 2 to 5 seconds. Responses will be recorded by the researcher. The outcome (accuracy) will be expressed as the percentage of correct responses over the total number of trials.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
438654
0
Pre-intervention baseline, at intervention completion, 4-, 8-, and 12-weeks post-completion of intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
438655
0
Peak alpha frequency (PAF)
Query!
Assessment method [6]
438655
0
Electroenchephalography (EEG)
Query!
Timepoint [6]
438655
0
Pre-intervention baseline, at intervention completion, 4-, 8-, and 12-weeks post-completion of intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
438656
0
Adherence
Query!
Assessment method [7]
438656
0
ElectraRx platform, which records the number of sessions scheduled, completed and missed by each participant throughout the intervention period
Query!
Timepoint [7]
438656
0
Each day that tDCS is applied (baseline, day 1-10 following treatment commencement)
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
438657
0
Tolerability
Query!
Assessment method [8]
438657
0
Self-reported bespoke online questionnaire created by the researchers specifically for this study, with a question about sensations experienced during the session (e.g. itching, burning, headache, fatigue, sleepiness, skin redness, tingling, or pain) and a 5-point Likert scale for each reported sensation to rate severity
Query!
Timepoint [8]
438657
0
Each day that tDCS is applied (baseline, day 1-10 following treatment commencement)
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
438658
0
Safety
Query!
Assessment method [9]
438658
0
Safety will be assessed via the incidence of adverse events (e.g. headache, dizziness, nausea) assessed by self-report used a 5-point Likert scale
Query!
Timepoint [9]
438658
0
Each day that tDCS is applied (baseline, day 1-10 following treatment commencement)
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
438659
0
Spatial summation
Query!
Assessment method [10]
438659
0
Spatial summation will be evaluated using the same pressure algometer, but with different sized probes (0.5cm, 1cm, 2cm). The same methods as described above for the PPT will be followed, but performed separately for each probe size. A minimum interstimulus interval of 45s will be implemented. The three different probe sizes will be introduced in a random order. Three trials will be performed for each size, and the average of the three will be calculated.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
438659
0
Pre-intervention baseline, at intervention completion, 4-, 8-, and 12-weeks post-completion of intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
450184
0
Psychological distress
Query!
Assessment method [11]
450184
0
Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale - 21 (DASS-21)
Query!
Timepoint [11]
450184
0
Pre-intervention baseline, at intervention completion, 4-, 8-, and 12-weeks post-completion of intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
450185
0
Temporal summation
Query!
Assessment method [12]
450185
0
Temporal summation will be evaluated by recording pain ratings whilst delivering consecutive noxious pressure stimuli using the pressure algometer with a 1cm2 probe. The previously determined PPT intensity will be applied over the LES muscles 10 consecutive times, one side at a time. For each stimulus, pressure will be increased over a one second period and maintained for one second at the PPT intensity, with a one second interstimulus interval. Pain intensity of the pressure-induced sensation will be collected using a numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) after the first, fifth, and tenth stimulus.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
450185
0
Pre-intervention baseline, upon intervention completion, 4-, 8-, and 12 weeks post-intervention completion
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
450186
0
Conditioned pain modulation
Query!
Assessment method [13]
450186
0
The test stimulus will be the average of three PPT recordings over the LES muscle on the painful side, and the conditioning stimulus will involve immersing the contralateral hand in temperature-controlled ice water (4-6°C). A pump will be used to circulate the water to maintain a consistent temperature. Pressure pain thresholds will be recorded both before and after one minute of cold immersion. The difference between the pre- and post-immersion PPT values will be used to quantify the CPM effect, with larger positive values indicating more efficient descending inhibitory pain control.
Query!
Timepoint [13]
450186
0
Pre-intervention baseline, upon intervention completion, 4-, 8-, and 12-weeks post-completion of intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
450187
0
Frontal alpha asymmetry [FAA]
Query!
Assessment method [14]
450187
0
EEG
Query!
Timepoint [14]
450187
0
Pre-intervention baseline, upon intervention completion, 4-, 8-, and 12-weeks post-completion of intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
450188
0
Power spectral density (PSD)
Query!
Assessment method [15]
450188
0
EEG
Query!
Timepoint [15]
450188
0
Pre-intervention baseline, upon intervention completion, 4-, 8-, and 12-weeks post-completion of intervention
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Eligible participants must be 18 years of age or older and experiencing acute or subacute LBP – defined as pain in the region between the 12th thoracic vertebra and the gluteal fold, present for at least 7 days and no more than 8 weeks at the time of enrolment. Participants with referred pain beyond this region may be included provided there are no clinical signs of radicular pain from neural tissue involvement, as assessed by an experienced physiotherapist. For participants with a previous history of LBP to be eligible, they must have experienced a period of at least one month pain-free prior to the current episode. As part of the screening process, pain intensity will be recorded for all prospective participants using a 10cm visual analogue scale (VAS) and only those reporting a minimum average weekly pain intensity of 4/10 during screening will be included. Participants must provide written informed consent to participate, be able to speak, read and understand instructions in English, and be able to attend laboratory appointments at Western Sydney University in Campbelltown, Australia.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Participants will be excluded if they are suspected to have radiculopathy or lumbosacral radicular pain, as determined by an experienced physiotherapist using previously employed diagnostic criteria. All potential participants will be screened for red flags in accordance with the NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation guidelines. Those identified with red flags will be advised to attend the nearest Emergency Department and will be excluded from the study unless subsequently medically cleared of serious spinal pathology (e.g. fracture, tumour, cauda equina syndrome). Participants with a history of lumbar spinal surgery, comorbid acute or chronic pain conditions, a history of a chronic pain condition in the past 12 months, current or past history of a significant neurological disorder, or other comorbidities affecting sensorimotor processes will also be excluded. All potential participants will be screened for contraindications to TMS and home-based tDCS (e.g. epilepsy, electronic or metal implants in the head, cognitive impairment) using the TMS/tDCS Adult Safety Screen questionnaire and excluded if any are present. Participants will also be asked to provide a log of any medications they take currently and within the month preceding the trial, including medication type, frequency and dosage. Participants will be excluded if they take any medications thought to interfere with tDCS (e.g. benzodiazepines) or with cognitive or sensory function (e.g. opioid intake greater than daily morphine equivalent 40mg). Participants will be excluded if they are unable to understand instructions and complete questionnaires provided in English.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Sealed opaque envelopes
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
An investigator with no involvement in assessment or intervention delivery will create a randomisation schedule using a random number generator.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people administering the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Information collected will be used for analysis purposes only, and will be reported as group data. No individual participant will be identified.
The effect of home-based tDCS on pain intensity, disability (ODI), mechanical sensitivity (PPTs), temporal summation, and CPM will be analysed using mixed-model analyses of variance (ANOVAs) with factors “Group” (active versus sham) and “Time” (pre-intervention baseline, at intervention completion, 4-, 8-, and 12-weeks post-completion of intervention). The effect of the intervention on spatial summation will be analysed using mixed-model ANOVAs with “Group” (active versus sham) as a between-subject factor, and both “Time” (pre-intervention baseline, at intervention completion, 4-, 8-, and 12-weeks post-completion of intervention) and “Probe Size” (0.5, 1 and 2cm2) as within-subject factors. Where appropriate, post-hoc analyses will be performed using Sidak-adjusted multiple comparison tests.
Pain persistence will be evaluated using a chi-square test to compare between groups the number of participants who present with persistent pain (average weekly VAS score >0) at 6 weeks and 12 weeks post-completion of the intervention, reported descriptively. Adverse effects and adherence (completed sessions) will also be compared descriptively. The proportion of people who were successfully blinded (incorrect guess or unsure) will be calculated for each group and compared using Fisher’s exact tests. The Bang Blinding Index (percentage of blinding beyond chance) will also be calculated for each group, whereby a 95% confidence interval that covers 0 will indicate unblinding, and a Blinding Index >0.20 will indicate unblinding beyond chance.
For the intervention group only, the difference between the individualised MCID reported by each participant prior to their first tDCS session, and the actual change in pain intensity they report at each subsequent assessment session (completion of intervention, 4-, 8-, and 12-weeks post-completion of intervention) will be calculated. The number of participants who do or do not meet their individualised MCID following the intervention will then be compared and reported descriptively.
All analyses will be conducted in consultation with an experienced biostatistician. All ANOVAs will be performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software (version 23; IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA). Statistical significance will be set at p < 0.05.
We intend to also investigate the mechanisms underlying any observed effects of tDCS compared to sham on pain intensity, mechanical sensitivity and disability using causal mediation analysis. The hypothesised potential mediators are described in the previous section under the heading Mechanistic factors (potential mediators) based on theory and experimental evidence of tDCS targets. The statistical analysis plan will be prospectively registered and follow the counterfactual-based framework using a regression-based approach. Results will be reported as indirect and direct effect estimates with corresponding 95% confidence intervals and follow the AGReMA (A Guideline for Reporting Mediation Analyses) statement.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
4/12/2024
Query!
Actual
5/06/2025
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
19/03/2027
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
18/06/2027
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
40
Query!
Accrual to date
3
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
317198
0
Commercial sector/Industry
Query!
Name [1]
317198
0
HCF Research Foundation
Query!
Address [1]
317198
0
Query!
Country [1]
317198
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Dr Rocco Cavaleri - Western Sydney University
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
319465
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
319465
0
Western Sydney University
Query!
Address [1]
319465
0
Query!
Country [1]
319465
0
Australia
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
283141
0
Individual
Query!
Name [1]
283141
0
Dr Simon Summers
Query!
Address [1]
283141
0
Query!
Country [1]
283141
0
Australia
Query!
Other collaborator category [2]
283142
0
Individual
Query!
Name [2]
283142
0
Associate Professor Tasha Stanton
Query!
Address [2]
283142
0
Query!
Country [2]
283142
0
Australia
Query!
Other collaborator category [3]
283143
0
Individual
Query!
Name [3]
283143
0
Dr Daniel Thomson
Query!
Address [3]
283143
0
Query!
Country [3]
283143
0
Australia
Query!
Other collaborator category [4]
283144
0
Individual
Query!
Name [4]
283144
0
Ariane Suhood
Query!
Address [4]
283144
0
Query!
Country [4]
283144
0
Australia
Query!
Other collaborator category [5]
283175
0
Individual
Query!
Name [5]
283175
0
Dr Luke Jenkins
Query!
Address [5]
283175
0
Query!
Country [5]
283175
0
Australia
Query!
Other collaborator category [6]
283176
0
Individual
Query!
Name [6]
283176
0
Dr Amitabh Gupta
Query!
Address [6]
283176
0
Query!
Country [6]
283176
0
Australia
Query!
Other collaborator category [7]
283177
0
Individual
Query!
Name [7]
283177
0
Dr Ghufran Alhassani
Query!
Address [7]
283177
0
Query!
Country [7]
283177
0
Australia
Query!
Other collaborator category [8]
283180
0
Individual
Query!
Name [8]
283180
0
Prof James McAuley
Query!
Address [8]
283180
0
Query!
Country [8]
283180
0
Australia
Query!
Other collaborator category [9]
283596
0
Individual
Query!
Name [9]
283596
0
Dr Aidan Cashin
Query!
Address [9]
283596
0
Query!
Country [9]
283596
0
Australia
Query!
Other collaborator category [10]
283597
0
Individual
Query!
Name [10]
283597
0
Keeley McNally
Query!
Address [10]
283597
0
Query!
Country [10]
283597
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
315937
0
University of Western Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
315937
0
https://www.westernsydney.edu.au/research/research_ethics_and_integrity/human_ethics/apply_for_human_research_ethics_review
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
315937
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
315937
0
14/10/2024
Query!
Approval date [1]
315937
0
19/02/2025
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
315937
0
H16334
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This project aims to, for the first time, examine the effectiveness of portable, home-based transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to reduce pain and disability in people with acute low back pain. Such data may provide novel insights into whether early tDCS could feasibly prevent chronic pain development. Further, potential mechanisms underlying any observed effects of tDCS on pain and function will be explored by investigating corticomotor organisation, somatosensory function, EEG, and affective-emotional characteristics as possible mediating factors. Given that no study has investigated the treatment in this context, safety, adherence, and tolerability will be examined. This may facilitate the development of an effective, inexpensive, and home-based means by which to manage low back pain, reducing the associated social, financial, and physical burden. We hypothesise that home-based tDCS will be a safe, effective, and well-tolerated means of reducing pain and disability in people with acute low back pain, with minimal or no adverse effects.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
136274
0
Dr Rocco Cavaleri
Query!
Address
136274
0
Western Sydney University, School of Health Sciences, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751
Query!
Country
136274
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
136274
0
+61 2 4620 3994
Query!
Fax
136274
0
Query!
Email
136274
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
136275
0
Rocco Cavaleri
Query!
Address
136275
0
Western Sydney University, School of Health Sciences, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751
Query!
Country
136275
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
136275
0
+61 2 4620 3994
Query!
Fax
136275
0
Query!
Email
136275
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
136276
0
Rocco Cavaleri
Query!
Address
136276
0
Western Sydney University, School of Health Sciences, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751
Query!
Country
136276
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
136276
0
+61 2 4620 3994
Query!
Fax
136276
0
Query!
Email
136276
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will the study consider sharing individual participant data?
Yes
Will there be any conditions when requesting access to individual participant data?
Persons/groups eligible to request access:
•
Available on a case-by-case basis at the discretion of the lead investigator
Conditions for requesting access:
•
-
What individual participant data might be shared?
•
All individual participant data collected throughout the trial, after de-identification. This includes baseline participant characteristics and data relating to all outcome measures listed in Step 4: Outcomes.
What types of analyses could be done with individual participant data?
•
Grant applications and any future studies including systematic reviews
When can requests for individual participant data be made (start and end dates)?
From:
Immediately following publication, up until 5 years following main results publication
To:
-
Where can requests to access individual participant data be made, or data be obtained directly?
•
Access subject to approvals by Principal Investigator (
[email protected]
)
Are there extra considerations when requesting access to individual participant data?
No
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF