Trial Review

Did you know?

The ANZCTR now automatically displays published trial results and simplifies the addition of trial documents such as unpublished protocols and statistical analysis plans.

These enhancements will offer a more comprehensive view of trials, regardless of whether their results are positive, negative, or inconclusive.

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this information for consumers
Trial registered on ANZCTR


Registration number
ACTRN12616000736448
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
1/06/2016
Date registered
3/06/2016
Date last updated
10/02/2021
Date data sharing statement initially provided
19/06/2019
Type of registration
Prospectively registered

Titles & IDs
Public title
Canadian-Australian Randomised Trial of Screening Kidney Transplant Candidates for Coronary Artery Disease
Scientific title
Canadian-Australian Randomised Trial of Screening Kidney Transplant Candidates for Coronary Artery Disease
Secondary ID [1] 289143 0

Nil known
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Trial acronym
CARSK study
Linked study record

Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Kidney failure 298649 0
Kidney transplant 298650 0
Coronary artery disease 298651 0
Condition category
Condition code
Renal and Urogenital 298714 298714 0 0
Kidney disease
Cardiovascular 298715 298715 0 0
Coronary heart disease

Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Patients randomised to no screening will not undergo regular non-invasive testing for CAD while on the kidney transplant waitlist.

The current practice for waitlisted patients is to be screened every 1-2 years based on perceived risk of CAD. At any time, if patients develop symptoms of CAD, they will be treated according to local standard of care.

Patients in this group will be contacted every 6 months on the wait-list, and at 3 and 12 months post-transplant. The duration of the study will be 5 years.
Intervention code [1] 294658 0
Early detection / Screening
Comparator / control treatment
Patients randomised to routine screening will undergo noninvasive testing for coronary artery disease every year or second yearly as determined by local transplant centre practice. The duration of screening in the control is same as the intervention group (5 years).
Patients transplanted during the study will be followed for 12 months post-date of transplant and will exit study. This applies for both SCREENING and NO SCREENING groups.
Control group
Active

Outcomes
Primary outcome [1] 298192 0
Primary efficacy: major adverse cardiac event (MACE), defined as any of the following: cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, emergency revascularisation, hospitalisation with unstable angina.

The outcome will be assessed by:
1) Notification to the transplant coordinators when patients are admitted in hospital (this is the usual standard of care in wait-listed patients).
2) The trial coordinator will gather electronic medical records, letters. procedure notes and will fill in the relevant case record form on the REDCap database (managed by Sydney local health district). All data are encrypted and stored on servers at SLHD, where it is backed up.
3) Patients will be followed up 6 monthly (alternating by phone and clinic visits) where trial coordinators will discuss any hospitalisations with the patients.
Timepoint [1] 298192 0
We will analyse time to first MACE event for the duration of the trial (5-years)
Secondary outcome [1] 323451 0
All cause death
Timepoint [1] 323451 0
This event will be reported to the trial/coordinator at any stage during the 5 year study (this is already standard practice) and is usually instigated by patient's family, their nephrologists, general practitioners or cardiologists. Trial coordinators will gather procedure notes/discharge letters and details will be entered into the REDCap database through relevant electronic case record forms (eCR
Secondary outcome [2] 324441 0
This event will be reported to the trial/coordinator at any stage during the 5 year study (this is already standard practice) and is usually instigated by patient's family, their nephrologists, general practitioners or cardiologists. Trial coordinators will gather procedure notes/discharge letters and details will be entered into the REDCap database through relevant electronic case record forms (eCRF)
Timepoint [2] 324441 0
This event will be reported to the trial/coordinator at any stage during the 5 year study (this is already standard practice) and is usually instigated by patient's family, their nephrologists, general practitioners or cardiologists. Trial coordinators will gather procedure notes/discharge letters and details will be entered into the REDCap database through relevant electronic case record forms (eCRF)
Secondary outcome [3] 324442 0
Emergency revascularisation
Timepoint [3] 324442 0
This event will be reported to the trial/coordinator at any stage during the 5 year study (this is already standard practice) and is usually instigated by patient's family, their nephrologists, general practitioners or cardiologists. Trial coordinators will gather procedure notes/discharge letters and details will be entered into the REDCap database through relevant electronic case record forms (eCRF)
Secondary outcome [4] 324443 0
Stroke
Timepoint [4] 324443 0
This event will be reported to the trial/coordinator at any stage during the 5 year study (this is already standard practice) and is usually instigated by patients, their nephrologists or cardiologists. Trial coordinators will gather procedure notes/discharge letters and details will be entered into the REDCap database through relevant electronic case record forms (eCRFs).
Secondary outcome [5] 324445 0
major bleeding requiring hospitalisation
Timepoint [5] 324445 0
This event event will be reported to the trial/coordinator at any stage during the 4-5 year study (this is already typically standard practice) and is usually instigated by patients, their nephrologists or cardiologists. Trial coordinators will gather procedure notes/discharge letters and details will be entered into the REDCap database through relevant electronic case record forms (eCRFs).
Secondary outcome [6] 324446 0
Health related quality of life
Timepoint [6] 324446 0
Quality of life will be assessed at baseline, 6 months, 12 months, then 6 monthly thereafter for the duration of the study (5 years) We will administer two surveys: KDQOL-36 and EQ5D-5L. Both will be done at baseline, then this will be alternated in a 6 monthly interval.
Secondary outcome [7] 324447 0
Time off waiting list (including number of temporary suspension and duration of each suspension)
Timepoint [7] 324447 0
Trial coordinators will be notified by the transplant coordinators when patients are suspended from the wait list including dates of date suspension, and date of reactivation. Trial coordinators will then enter this information on the relevant eCRF. This outcome will be followed up throughout 5 years
Secondary outcome [8] 324448 0
Cost effectiveness
Timepoint [8] 324448 0
Data on resource use will be obtained in two ways. First through identification of tests, procedures and doctor’s visits related to cardiac and renal management for all study participants from randomisation to study end as recorded in the patient diaries and trial case report forms. Second, Australian participants will have their records linked to the Admitted Patient Data Collection, Emergency Department Data Collection, and through Medicare for all Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) outpatient visits, procedures and the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) for medicines. The analysis will take place at the end of the study. This outcome will be followed up for 5 years.
Secondary outcome [9] 324449 0
Incidence of permanent removal from list for cardiac causes
Timepoint [9] 324449 0
Trial coordinators will be notified by the transplant coordinators when patients are permanently removed from the wait-list and the reason for the removal. Trial coordinators will then enter this data onto relevant eCRF. This outcome will be followed for up to 5 years.
Secondary outcome [10] 324450 0
Incidence of transplantation
Timepoint [10] 324450 0
Such an event will be reported to the trial/coordinator at any stage during the 5 year study (this is already typically standard practice) and is usually instigated by patients, their nephrologists or cardiologists. Trial coordinators will gather procedure notes/discharge letters and details will be entered into the REDCap database through relevant electronic case record forms (eCRFs).
Secondary outcome [11] 324451 0
Cancellation of transplant due to CAD
Timepoint [11] 324451 0
Such an event will be reported to the trial/coordinator at any stage during the 5 year study (this is already typically standard practice) and is usually instigated by patients, their nephrologists or cardiologists. Trial coordinators will gather procedure notes/discharge letters and details will be entered into the REDCap database through relevant electronic case record forms (eCRFs
Secondary outcome [12] 349158 0
Cardiovascular death
Timepoint [12] 349158 0
time to cardiovascular death

Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1. adults aged 18 years of age or older
2. Dialysis-dependent kidney failure and currently being assessed for OR active on the kidney transplant waiting list
3. expected to require further screening for CAD prior to transplantation (by current standard of care);
4. able to give consent;
5. anticipated to undergo transplantation more than 12 months from date of enrolment
Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
No limit
Sex
Both males and females
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Key exclusion criteria
1. patients with signs or symptoms suggestive of uncontrolled cardiac disease such as unstable coronary syndromes, decompensated heart failure, uncontrolled arrhythmia, and severe valvular heart disease;
2. patients who “on-hold” for transplantation due to a medical problem;
3. patients with other solid organ transplants;
4. multi-organ transplant candidates (e.g. kidney-pancreas transplant candidates);
5) patients with planned living donor transplant;
6) patients unable to give consent.

Study design
Purpose of the study
Diagnosis
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Randomisation will be web-based and managed by the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Methods Centre Data Management services.
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Randomisation to treatment arm will be 1:1 allocation using random permuted blocks, stratified by site and diabetes status.
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Who is / are masked / blinded?



Intervention assignment
Parallel
Other design features
Multicentre, non-inferiority study
Phase
Not Applicable
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Statistical methods / analysis
Efficacy outcomes will be analysed using intention to treat. A significance level of 5% shall be used for all analyses, unless otherwise specified. All analyses will be adjusted for site.
The primary analysis will be an analysis of the time to first occurrence of the primary outcome MACE, using a Cox model with treatment arm as a covariate and stratified by site. This analysis will provide an estimate of the HR, a p-value and CI. Non-inferiority will be claimed if the 95%CI of the HR lies entirely lower than an HR value of 1.25, with the screening arm being the referent group. Superiority will be claimed if the 95%CI lies entirely lower than 1. Proportional hazards assumption will be assessed using log-log survival plots and Schoenfeld residuals.
The outcome of all-cause mortality will also be analyse using a Cox model. The time to all other outcomes will be analysed using a competing risk model, with the competing risk being death. Outcomes which can occur more than once will also be analysed using an Andersen and Gill model. This model is a natural extension of the Cox model and unlike the Poisson or Negative Binomial models for count data, does not require the assumption of a constant event rate over time. Robust standard errors using the Sandwich estimator will be applied to ensure the correct p-value and CIs are calculated.
All time to event data will also be graphically summarised using a Kaplan Meier or cumulative incidence curves comparing the two treatment arms.


Sample size calculation
We conservatively estimate an average MACE rate of 6%: MACE rates in the U.S. range from 8.7 % in the first year after a kidney transplant to 13.2 % per year on the waiting list. Using a MACE rate of 6% per year and non-inferiority defined as a Hazard Ratio (HR) of MACE < 1.25, randomization of 3306 patients will give us 80% power using a two-sided 5% significance level. An HR of 1.25 equates to an absolute difference in MACE being <1.4% higher in the non-screening group compared to the regular screening group (i.e. 7.4% versus 6.0 %).


Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
14/06/2016
Actual
7/06/2016
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Actual
Sample size
Target
3306
Accrual to date
1000
Final
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
ACT,NSW,QLD,TAS,WA,VIC
Recruitment hospital [1] 5734 0
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital - Camperdown
Recruitment hospital [2] 5735 0
Westmead Hospital - Westmead
Recruitment hospital [3] 5737 0
Monash Medical Centre - Clayton campus - Clayton
Recruitment hospital [4] 5739 0
Austin Health - Austin Hospital - Heidelberg
Recruitment hospital [5] 5741 0
Prince of Wales Hospital - Randwick
Recruitment hospital [6] 8674 0
St George Hospital - Kogarah
Recruitment hospital [7] 8675 0
Liverpool Hospital - Liverpool
Recruitment hospital [8] 11386 0
Box Hill Hospital - Box Hill
Recruitment hospital [9] 11387 0
The Royal Adelaide Hospital - Adelaide
Recruitment postcode(s) [1] 23285 0
3128 - Box Hill
Recruitment postcode(s) [2] 23286 0
5000 - Adelaide
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1] 7857 0
New Zealand
State/province [1] 7857 0
Auckland
Country [2] 7858 0
Canada
State/province [2] 7858 0
British Columbia
Country [3] 21620 0
Spain
State/province [3] 21620 0
Country [4] 23456 0
United States of America
State/province [4] 23456 0
district of columbia

Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1] 293518 0
Government body
Name [1] 293518 0
National Health and Medical Research Council
Country [1] 293518 0
Australia
Funding source category [2] 293729 0
Charities/Societies/Foundations
Name [2] 293729 0
Heart Foundation
Country [2] 293729 0
New Zealand
Funding source category [3] 300060 0
Government body
Name [3] 300060 0
Canandian Institues of Health Research
Country [3] 300060 0
Canada
Primary sponsor type
University
Name
University of Sydney
Address
Camperdown, Sydney, New South Wales 2006
Country
Australia
Secondary sponsor category [1] 292561 0
Individual
Name [1] 292561 0
John Gill
Address [1] 292561 0
St Paul's Hospital
Burrard St,
Vancouver, BC
Canada, V6Z 1Y6
Country [1] 292561 0
Canada
Secondary sponsor category [2] 292562 0
Individual
Name [2] 292562 0
Helen Pilmore
Address [2] 292562 0
Auckland City Hospital
Park Rd, Grafton, Auckland, New Zealand 1023
Country [2] 292562 0
New Zealand

Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Ethics committee name [1] 295011 0
Human Research Ethics Committee (Royal Prince Alfred Hospital)
Ethics committee address [1] 295011 0
Research Development Office
Suite 210A
RPAH Medical Centre
100 Carillon Avenue
NEWTOWN NSW 2042
Ethics committee country [1] 295011 0
Australia
Date submitted for ethics approval [1] 295011 0
Approval date [1] 295011 0
15/06/2015
Ethics approval number [1] 295011 0
Ethics committee name [2] 295172 0
Health and disability ethics committees
Ethics committee address [2] 295172 0
Ministry of Health
Freyberg building
20 Aitken st
PO Box 5013
Wellington 6011
Ethics committee country [2] 295172 0
New Zealand
Date submitted for ethics approval [2] 295172 0
Approval date [2] 295172 0
29/09/2015
Ethics approval number [2] 295172 0

Summary
Brief summary
Cardiovascular disease is the commonest cause of death while on the kidney transplant waiting list and after transplantation. Current standard care involves screening for coronary artery disease prior to waitlist entry, then every 1-2 years, according to perceived risk, until transplanted. The aim of screening is two-fold. Firstly to identify patients with asymptomatic coronary disease to enable either correction, by bypass surgery or angioplasty, or removal of the patient from the list, with the ultimate aim of preventing premature cardiovascular mortality at the time of, or soon after kidney transplantation. Secondly, from a societal perspective, to prevent mis-direction of scarce donor organs into recipients who experience early mortality. This current screening strategy is not evidence based, has substantial known and potential harms, and is very costly. Two major issues of uncertainty require addressing in sequence: (1) whether to periodically screen asymptomatic wait-listed patients for occult coronary artery disease; and (2) whether to revascularise coronary stenoses in asymptomatic patients prior to transplantation. The CARSK study seeks to address the first of these 2 issues.

CARSK aims to
1. Test the hypothesis that after screening for wait list entry, no further screening for coronary artery disease (CAD) is non-inferior to the current standard care which is screening all asymptomatic wait-listed patients for CAD at regular intervals.
2. Compare the benefits and costs of not screening versus regular CAD screening from a health system perspective.
Trial website
Trial related presentations / publications
Public notes
A pilot study (Coronary Artery Disease Screening in Kidney Transplant Candidates, Clinicaltrials.gov #NCT02082483) has been conducted in Canada to determine the feasibility of a multicenter, randomised, parallel group definitive trial. Canadian participants enrolled in this prospectively registered study will be rolled over into the main CARSK study and are included for in the sample size.
Attachments [1] 878 878 0 0
/AnzctrAttachments/370643-CARSKethics.pdf
Attachments [2] 918 918 0 0
/AnzctrAttachments/370643-CARSK protocol V3 02_05_aw_ty.docx
Attachments [3] 2872 2872 0 0
/AnzctrAttachments/370643-CARSK protocol V6 22-03-18_clean.pdf (Protocol)

Contacts
Principal investigator
Name 65630 0
Prof Steven Chadban
Address 65630 0
Charles Perkins Centre
(2W73), level 2, Kidney node,
Building D17
Johns Hopkins Drive (off Missenden Road)
The University of Sydney NSW 2006
Country 65630 0
Australia
Phone 65630 0
+61295156600
Fax 65630 0
Email 65630 0
[email protected]
Contact person for public queries
Name 65631 0
Tracey Ying
Address 65631 0
Charles Perkins Centre
(2W57), level 2, Kidney node,
Building D17
Johns Hopkins Drive (off Missenden Road)
The University of Sydney NSW 2006
Country 65631 0
Australia
Phone 65631 0
+61295156600
Fax 65631 0
Email 65631 0
[email protected]
Contact person for scientific queries
Name 65632 0
Tracey Ying
Address 65632 0
Charles Perkins Centre
(2W57), level 2, Kidney node,
Building D17
Johns Hopkins Drive (off Missenden Road)
The University of Sydney NSW 2006
Country 65632 0
Australia
Phone 65632 0
+61295156600
Fax 65632 0
Email 65632 0
[email protected]

Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Yes
What data in particular will be shared?
Researchers requesting individual patient data will be considered on a case by case basis by the trial steering committee
When will data be available (start and end dates)?
Data will only be available after trial conclusion (approximately 2024-2025) for a period of 15 years.
Available to whom?
available to all researchers on a case by case basis
Available for what types of analyses?
data analyses will be considered on a case by case basis
How or where can data be obtained?
secure data transfer


What supporting documents are/will be available?

Doc. No.TypeCitationLinkEmailOther DetailsAttachment
10560Study protocolYing T, Gill J, Webster A, et al. Canadian-Australasian Randomised trial of screening kidney transplant candidates for coronary artery disease-A trial protocol for the CARSK study. Am Heart J. 2019;214:175-183. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2019.05.008https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2019.05.008 



Results publications and other study-related documents

Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.

Documents added automatically
SourceTitleYear of PublicationDOI
EmbaseRisk Stratification and Treatment of Coronary Disease in Chronic Kidney Disease and End-Stage Kidney Disease.2018https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semnephrol.2018.08.004
EmbaseScreening for Asymptomatic Coronary Artery Disease in Waitlisted Kidney Transplant Candidates: A Cost-Utility Analysis.2020https://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.10.001
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.