Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
A database of clinical trials and their results from Australia, New Zealand, and other countries.
account_circle
Log in
to register or update your trial
search
Search for trials
Trial Review
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01674608
Registration number
NCT01674608
Ethics application status
Date submitted
14/08/2012
Date registered
29/08/2012
Date last updated
6/05/2015
Titles & IDs
Public title
TEAM: Trial of Early Activity and Mobilization
Query!
Scientific title
TEAM: An Multi-centre Observational Study of Early Activity and Mobilization in Australia and New Zealand
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
ICF
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
TEAM
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Critically Ill Adults Ventilated >24 Hours in Intensive Care
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Observational
Query!
Patient registry
Query!
Target follow-up duration
Query!
Target follow-up type
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Best level of activity in ICU
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Highest level of activity (11 point scale) including: unknown nothing (lying in bed, passive stretches) sitting in bed, active exercises in bed moved to chair (via hoist, slide etc but no standing) sitting over edge of bed standing transferring bed to chair marching on spot (at bedside) walking with assistance of 2 or more people walking with assistance of 1 person walking independently with a gait aid walking independently without a gait aid
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
ICU stay (average 7 days)
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
Dosage of the best level of activity
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
The time spent performing the best level of activity and the number of times it is achieved
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Intensive care unit stay (average 7 days)
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
0
0
Time to standing in ICU
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
The number of days in ICU before a patient can stand
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Intensive care stay (average 7 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Best level of activity at hospital discharge
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Highest level of activity (11 point scale) including: unknown nothing (lying in bed, passive stretches) sitting in bed, active exercises in bed passively moved to chair (pat slide, hoist but no standing) sitting over edge of bed standing transferring bed to chair marching on spot (at bedside) walking with assistance of 2 or more people walking with assistance of 1 person walking independently with a gait aid walking independently without a gait aid
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Hospital stay (median days 14)
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Time to first sit out of bed
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
The number of days until the patient can sit out of bed
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
ICU stay (average 7 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Barriers to mobilisation
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Factors that may have been a barrier to mobilizing patients in the ICU
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Intensive care unit stay (average 7 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Mobilization related adverse events
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Adverse events that occured during patient mobilization such as an unplanned extubation or a fall to the floor
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Intensive care unit stay (average 7 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Time to first physiotherapy
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
The number of days in intensive care before the patient was reviewed by a physiotherapist
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Intensive care unit stay (average 7 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Mechanical ventilation free days
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
The number of mechanical ventilation free days to day 28
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
28 days
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Intensive care unit free days
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
The number of days the patient spent out of ICU to day 28 (if dead = 0)
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Day 28
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
90 day mortality
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
The mortality at day 90
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
90 days
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Health related quality of life at 6 months
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
Health related quality of life reported via telephone interview at 6 months using the EuroQoL EQ5D
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
6 months
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* they have received invasive mechanical ventilation for at least 24 hours, and have been in ICU less than 72 hours
* the treating clinician expects the patient to still be receiving invasive mechanical ventilation in the ICU the day after tomorrow.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Age less than 18 years old
* Patient has a proven or suspected acute primary brain process that is likely to result in global impairment of conscious level or cognition, such as traumatic brain injury, intracranial haemorrhage, stroke, or hypoxic brain injury after cardiac arrest or asphyxiation.
* Second or subsequent admission to ICU during a single hospital admission
* Patient does not speak English
* Patient has proven or suspected primary myopathic or neurological process associated with prolonged weakness, such as Guillain-Barre syndrome
* Death is deemed imminent and inevitable
* Inability to walk without assistance prior to the acute illness that is associated with admission to ICU (use of a cane or walker not an exclusion)
* Cognitive impairment prior to the acute illness that is associated with admission to ICU (refer data dictionary)
* Any written "Rest In Bed" or non-weight bearing medical order such as may occur with hip fracture, unstable spine or pelvis, pathological fracture
Query!
Study design
Purpose
Query!
Duration
Query!
Selection
Query!
Timing
Prospective
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/07/2012
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/03/2014
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
192
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
The Alfred - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
3104 - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Wellington
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Other
Query!
Name
Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
0
0
Other
Query!
Name [1]
0
0
Intensive Care Foundation, Australia
Query!
Address [1]
0
0
Query!
Country [1]
0
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) traditionally receive bed rest as part of their care. They develop muscle weakness even after only a few days of mechanical ventilation that may prolong their time in ICU and in hospital, but the nature of such weakness is poorly understood. The weakness that develops in ICU is more substantial than that which would result from bed rest alone and is referred to as ICU acquired weakness (ICUAW). This weakness might be due to the combination of inflammation and immobility. The exact mechanisms leading to the nerve and muscle damage which occurs in critical illness are not yet fully understood and require further investigation. However, it is known that ICUAW has an effect on a patient's ability to breathe without a ventilator, walk and perform simple activities (like washing and toileting) and often results in longer mechanical ventilation time and hence, longer hospital stays than might otherwise be expected. It may also affect a patient's ability to return home after their hospital stay. The recovery period in Australian and New Zealand ICU patients is unknown but a trial from Canada has reported ongoing weakness five years after leaving ICU. Weakness in survivors of intensive care is known to be a substantial problem. It is currently not known whether ICUAW may be avoided or its severity reduced with simple strategies of early exercise in ICU. There are no data about the level of activity and mobility in critically ill patients in Australian and New Zealand ICUs. These data are urgently required to plan a program of research to test whether increasing the level of mobility and activity in our critically ill patients is safe, feasible and efficacious in terms of reducing the severity of ICUAW and improving patient-centred outcomes. The program of research will first include a study to observe the mobility levels in 25 ICUs across Australia and New Zealand to determine safety, barriers to mobility and what type of activities are undertaken by our patients. From the observational data we plan to develop a pilot randomised controlled trial of early mobility and activity in intensive care units across Australia and New Zealand. This simple, cost-effective strategy may improve functional ability, decrease time on mechanical ventilation and improve long term outcomes in this patient group. By initiating such a program, ANZ investigators might be able to change future patient outcomes worldwide.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01674608
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
TEAM Study Investigators; Hodgson C, Bellomo R, Berney S, Bailey M, Buhr H, Denehy L, Harrold M, Higgins A, Presneill J, Saxena M, Skinner E, Young P, Webb S. Early mobilization and recovery in mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU: a bi-national, multi-centre, prospective cohort study. Crit Care. 2015 Feb 26;19(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0765-4. Tipping CJ, Bailey MJ, Bellomo R, Berney S, Buhr H, Denehy L, Harrold M, Holland A, Higgins AM, Iwashyna TJ, Needham D, Presneill J, Saxena M, Skinner EH, Webb S, Young P, Zanni J, Hodgson CL. The ICU Mobility Scale Has Construct and Predictive Validity and Is Responsive. A Multicenter Observational Study. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Jun;13(6):887-93. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201510-717OC.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Carol Hodgson, PhD
Query!
Address
0
0
ANZIC-RC
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Type
Citations or Other Details
Journal
TEAM Study Investigators; Hodgson C, Bellomo R, Be...
[
More Details
]
Results not provided in
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01674608
Download to PDF