Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06902233
Registration number
NCT06902233
Ethics application status
Date submitted
23/03/2025
Date registered
30/03/2025
Date last updated
14/05/2025
Titles & IDs
Public title
Brain Network Stimulation for Chronic Low Back Pain.
Query!
Scientific title
High-definition Transcranial Infraslow Gray Noise Stimulation for Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain: A Double-blinded Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
24-176
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
2024 FULL 21891
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Musculoskeletal
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other muscular and skeletal disorders
Query!
Neurological
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other neurological disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Devices - High-definition transcranial infraslow grey noise stimulation
Treatment: Devices - Sham Comparator
Experimental: High definition transcranial infraslow gray noise stimulation (HD-tIGNS) - For the active stimulation group, the HD-tIGNS will be delivered for 30min, with 60s ramp up and ramp down at the beginning and end of each stimulation session, with continuous stimulation in between. The gray noise (50%) will be superimposed on the infraslow (0.1Hz) sinusoidal waveform (50%), with the maximum current strength of 2.0 mA per electrode and the maximum total current injected being 4.0mA.
Sham comparator: Sham stimulation - For the sham stimulation group, to create an identical skin sensation to the active stimulation, we will use the Actisham protocol (with FC2 as the itchy electrode) created by the Neuroelectrics. The current will be applied for a 5s ramp up and 5s ramp down at the beginning of each stimulation session, without any current for the remainder of the stimulation period. The sham session will last as long as the HD-tIGNS session to blind the procedure appropriately.
Treatment: Devices: High-definition transcranial infraslow grey noise stimulation
HD-tIGNS will be administered three times a week (30 minutes/ session) for a total of 4 weeks (i.e., 12 sessions in total) using a 32-channel transcranial current stimulator. The HD-tIGNS will be used to alter the functional connectivity strength between the three cortical networks \[namely the salience network (SN), the default mode network (DMN) and the somatomotor network (SMN)\] in the infraslow frequency spectrum (0.1 Hz). A total of fifteen circular Ag/AgCl electrodes \[eleven stimulation electrodes (C1, C2, C3, C4, F7, F8, FC3, FT7, FPz, Fz, and O2) and four electrodes with zero current (FC1, FC2, FC4, and FCz)\] will be placed on a neoprene head cap following the International 10-10 EEG system. The optimal montages has been created using the Stimweaver optimization software by the Neuroelectrics company, to specifically decrease the functional connectivity i.e., phase synchronization of the brain regions of the SN with the SMN and the DMN.
Treatment: Devices: Sham Comparator
The Actisham protocol (with FC2 as the itchy electrode) created by the Neuroelectrics will be used for the sham stimulation group. Similar to the active treatment group, the actisham will be administered three times a week (30 minutes/ session) for a total of 4 weeks (i.e., 12 sessions in total) using a 32-channel transcranial current stimulator.Similar to active group, a total of fifteen circular Ag/AgCl electrodes will be placed on a neoprene head cap following the International 10-10 EEG system to appropriately blind the participant. The electrodes would comprise of four stimulation electrodes (FC1, FC2, FC4, and FCz) and eleven electrodes (C1, C2, C3, C4, F7, F8, FC3, FT7, FPz, Fz, and O2) with zero current.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Pain intensity
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Average pain intensity over the past week measured on a numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) of 0 to 10 (0=No pain to 10=Pain as bad as you can imagine) from the Brief Pain Inventory short form
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
The primary endpoint for efficacy assessment of HD-tIGNS will be change in the average pain intensity over the past week from baseline to one-week post completion of treatment.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Pain intensity
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Average pain intensity over the past week measured on a NPRS of 0 to 10 (0=No pain to 10=Pain as bad as you can imagine) from the Brief Pain Inventory short form.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Change in the average pain intensity over the past week from baseline to one-month, three-months and six-months post completion of treatment.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Pain interference
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), a standardised, validated questionnaire, will be used to capture pain interference in daily activities
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Change in the pain interference from baseline to one-week, one-month, three-months and six-months post completion of treatment.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Pain unpleasantness
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Pain unpleasantness (affective component) in past one week measured on an 11-point NPRS-unpleasantness scale.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Change in the pain unpleasantness from baseline to one-week, one-month, three-months and six-months post completion of treatment.
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Pain Bothersomeness
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Pain bothersomeness in past one week measured on an 11-point NPRS-bothersomeness scale.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Change in the pain bothersomeness from baseline to one-week, one-month, three-months and six-months post completion of treatment.
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Patient global impression of change
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Patient global impression of change (PGIC) 7-point scale will be used to evaluate participants perception of overall improvement compared to baseline.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Recorded at one-week, one-month, three-months, and six-months post completion of treatment.
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Movement Evoked Pain: Repeated spinal bending
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Participants will be asked to perform 20 repetitions each of 2 repeated spinal bending tasks (forward and backward bending) independently, with at least a 10-15 minute rest in between. Participants will rate their pain intensity on a NPRS (0=no pain to 100=worst pain imaginable) before commencing the movements, then following every 5 repetitions.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Recorded at baseline, and at one-week, one-month, three-months, and six-months post completion of treatment.
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Movement Evoked Pain: Back Performance scale
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
Back Performance scale (BPS) will be used to assess movement evoked pain (MEP) intensity during five functional tasks. Participants will be asked to rate their "pain rating at worst" during each task on a 0 to 100 NPRS. An MEP intensity composite score will be calculated by averaging pain ratings for the 5 tasks, with higher scores indicating greater MEP intensity.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Recorded at baseline, and at one-week, one-month, three-months, and six-months post completion of treatment.
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Mechanical temporal summation
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
Mechanical temporal summation (MTS): will be assessed using a nylon monofilament (Semmes monofilament 6.65, 300 g) at the most painful low back region (nominated by the participant) and the non-dominant wrist (distant region). Brief 10 repetitive contacts will be delivered at a rate of 1 Hz, externally cued by auditory stimuli. Participants will be asked to rate the level of pain experienced on NRS (0=no pain to 100=extreme pain) immediately after the first contact and to rate their greatest pain intensity after the 10th contact; with the difference representing the maximum amount of MTS across 10 contact points. Average of three trials will be calculated, with a positive score indicating an increase in MTS. The MTS index will be defined as the ratio of 'follow-up' pain rating divided by 'baseline' pain rating.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Recorded at baseline, and at one-week, one-month, three-months, and six-months post completion of treatment.
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Pressure Pain Threshold
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
Pressure pain threshold (PPT) will be assessed over the most painful low back region (nominated by the participant) and the non-dominant wrist (distant region) using a computerized, handheld digital algometer (AlgoMed; Medoc, Ramat Yishai, Israel) probe pressed over marked test site at a rate of 30 kPa/s. Participants will press the algometer trigger button in the patient control unit when pressure sensation changes to first pain. Average of three trials will be calculated and used for analysis
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Recorded at baseline, and at one-week, one-month, three-months, and six-months post completion of treatment.
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Function
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) will be used to assess self-reported functional abilities; within-group MCID is 30% decrease from baseline.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Recorded at baseline, and at one-week, one-month, three-months, and six-months post completion of treatment.
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Health Related Quality of Life
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions scale will be used to assess the health-related quality of life; within-group MCID is 0.03 and 10.5 from baseline for the health index and the thermometer respectively.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
Recorded at baseline, and at one-week, one-month, three-months, and six-months post completion of treatment.
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Well-Being
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
World Health Organization- Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5) will be used to measure the participant's current mental wellbeing.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
Recorded at baseline, and at one-week, one-month, three-months, and six-months post completion of treatment.
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Depression
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
Depression and Somatic Symptoms Scale (DSSS) will be used to evaluate the severity of depression (cutoff score of =15).
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
Recorded at baseline, and at one-week, one-month, three-months, and six-months post completion of treatment.
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
Catastrophizing
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) will be used to measure the extent of catastrophic thoughts and feelings about their pain.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
Recorded at baseline, and at one-week, one-month, three-months, and six-months post completion of treatment.
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
Attention to pain
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
Pain Vigilance and Awareness Questionnaire (PVAQ) will be used to measure the frequency of habitual 'attention to pain' over the past two weeks.
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
Recorded at baseline, and at one-week, one-month, three-months, and six-months post completion of treatment.
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
0
0
Positive and Negative Affect
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS-short form) will be used to measure the two-dominant dimensions of affect style, positive and negative affect.
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
Recorded at baseline, and at one-week, one-month, three-months, and six-months post completion of treatment.
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
0
0
Self-efficacy
Query!
Assessment method [17]
0
0
Pain self-efficacy (PSE), a 2-item questionnaire, will be used to assess pain self-efficacy beliefs.
Query!
Timepoint [17]
0
0
Recorded at baseline, and at one-week, one-month, three-months, and six-months post completion of treatment.
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
0
0
Intolerance to Uncertainity scale short form
Query!
Assessment method [18]
0
0
Intolerance of uncertainty (IUS) scale- short form (12 item), will be used to assess how individuals perceive and respond to uncertainty in their daily lives. Total score ranges between 5 to 60 with higher scores indicating higher levels of intolerance to uncertainity.
Query!
Timepoint [18]
0
0
Recorded at baseline, and at one-week, one-month, three-months, and six-months post completion of treatment.
Query!
Secondary outcome [19]
0
0
Tampa scale of Kinesiophobia
Query!
Assessment method [19]
0
0
Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK-11), will be used to quantify fear of movement. The scores ranges from 11 to 44, where higher scores indicate greater fear of pain, movement, and injury.
Query!
Timepoint [19]
0
0
Recorded at baseline, and at one-week, one-month, three-months, and six-months post completion of treatment.
Query!
Secondary outcome [20]
0
0
Rescue analgesics / Concomitant treatment
Query!
Assessment method [20]
0
0
The Quantitative analgesic questionnaire (QAQ) will be used to capture daily medication usage and a score will be generated to calculate weekly average pain medication use throughout the study. Other concomitant treatments including exercises, healthcare visits, etc. with the type and dosage will also be recorded throughout the study period using a diary.
Query!
Timepoint [20]
0
0
Recorded at baseline, and at one-week, one-month, three-months, and six-months post completion of treatment. QAQ will also be collected during intervention period, either at start of sessions (S1, S4, S7, S10) or after completion of the session (S12).
Query!
Secondary outcome [21]
0
0
Electroencephalography
Query!
Assessment method [21]
0
0
Resting-state eyes closed electroencephalogram (EEG) (\~10 minutes) will be obtained using SynAmps RT Amplifier (Compudemics Neuroscan) with 64 electrodes placed in the standard 10-10 International placement. During the intervention phase, resting state EEG will be collected using the Neuroelectrics Starstim32 system. Exact low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (eLORETA), will be used through the LORETA-key software package to estimate the intracerebral electrical sources that generate scalp-recorded electrical activity. Lagged phase synchronization will be used as a measure of functional connectivity and will be calculated between the targeted brain regions (i.e., dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, Somatosemsory cortex, motor cortex, Insula, pregenual anterior cingulate cortex) in the infraslow frequency band (0.1Hz).
Query!
Timepoint [21]
0
0
Recorded at baseline, and at one-week, one-month, three-months, and six-months post completion of treatment. EEG will also be collected during intervention phase either at start of the sessions (S1,S4,S7,S10) or after completion of sessions (S1 and S12).
Query!
Secondary outcome [22]
0
0
Emotional Stroop Task
Query!
Assessment method [22]
0
0
Participants will be presented with words from 3 interference categories (Sensory pain-related, Affective pain-related, and Positive-emotional) and 3 control categories (comprising of matched neutral words) in four different colours (blue, red, yellow, green) and will be asked to press one of four response keys to indicate the colour of the words regardless of their meaning. The participant's response, the correctness of the response, and the response latency (in ms) of each of the 6 different categories will be recorded. Each word will be displayed for 1.5s and there will be 16 words in a 24s block. A single trial will be conducted, and it will include 16 blocks, i.e., 2 blocks for each word-type, 2 blocks for each corresponding control word set, and four fixation-cross (rest) blocks (24s duration) presented on the screen at the beginning and twice within a trial. The average of two test blocks will be calculated and used for analysis.
Query!
Timepoint [22]
0
0
Recorded at baseline, and at one-week, one-month, three-months, and six-months post completion of treatment. Stroop testing will be also be done during the intervention phase either at start of sessions (S4, S7, S10) or after completion of session (S12).
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Age between 18 to 75 years on the day of screening
* Pain in the lower back (region between 12th rib and gluteal fold) with or without accompanying leg pain that occurs for at least half the days in the last six months
* An average pain intensity of =4 on the 11-point NPRS (0=No pain to 10=Pain as bad as you can imagine) in the week prior to enrolment
* A disability score of =5 on Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ).
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
75
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Known or suspected serious spinal pathology (fracture; lumbar canal stenosis, malignant, inflammatory or infective diseases of the spine; cauda equina syndrome or widespread neurological disorder)
* Suspected or confirmed pregnancy or less than six months post-partum
* Inflammatory disorders
* Auto-immune conditions
* Recent soft tissue injuries of the back in the last 3 months
* Recent steroid injections to the back in the past 3 months
* Recent spinal surgery in the past 12 months or scheduled/waiting for any major surgical procedures during the treatment or follow-up period or underwent rhizotomy or any neurosurgical procedures
* History of neurological conditions, or psychiatric disorders (except depression and anxiety disorders)
* History of cancer, or currently receiving/scheduled for receiving therapy for cancer
* Cognitive impairments (dementia, Alzheimer's disease; indicated by a total score of 24 or below on Mini-Mental State Examination)
* Alcohol or substance abuse
* History of epilepsy or seizures
* Presence of any electronic implants (e.g., pacemaker), metal implant in the body (particularly head and neck), or spinal cord stimulator.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/06/2025
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
1/01/2028
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
164
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Otago
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Other
Query!
Name
University of Otago
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
0
0
Other
Query!
Name [1]
0
0
Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
Query!
Address [1]
0
0
Query!
Country [1]
0
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This study looks at the non-invasive brain stimulation technique in people with chronic low back pain to see: * How effective non-invasive brain stimulation is at improving pain intensity in people with chronic low back pain? * How safe non-invasive brain stimulation is and what side effects there may be? * What study participants think of the study procedures and of the non-invasive brain stimulation as a treatment technique for chronic low back pain. Participants will be assigned to receive either active brain stimulation group or sham stimulation group randomly. Participants will be required to attend a total of twelve treatment sessions (approximately 1-hour each, three sessions per week, for four consecutive weeks). Assessments will be done at baseline (in the week 0), immediately post-completion of the intervention (in the week 5), and at the follow-up of one-month (in the week 8), three-months (in the week 16) and six-months (in the week 28) post-completion of intervention.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06902233
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Divya Adhia, Ph.D
Query!
Address
0
0
Department of Surgical Sciences, Dunedin School Of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Divya Adhia, Ph.D
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
0064211167594
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Data sharing statement
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results not provided in
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06902233
Download to PDF