Trial Review

Registering a new trial?

To achieve prospective registration, we recommend submitting your trial for registration at the same time as ethics submission.

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov

For full trial details, please see the original record at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00909597




Registration number
NCT00909597
Ethics application status
Date submitted
27/05/2009
Date registered
28/05/2009
Date last updated
2/11/2016

Titles & IDs
Public title
A Study of Taspoglutide Versus Pioglitazone in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
Scientific title
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind (Double Dummy), Active Controlled Study to Compare the Safety, Tolerability and Effect on Glycemic Control of Taspoglutide Versus Pioglitazone in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Inadequately Controlled on Therapy With Sulfonylurea or Metformin Plus Sulfonylurea
Secondary ID [1] 0 0
2009-009157-24
Secondary ID [2] 0 0
BC21893
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Trial acronym
Linked study record

Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 0 0
Condition category
Condition code
Metabolic and Endocrine 0 0 0 0
Diabetes

Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - pioglitazone
Treatment: Drugs - taspoglutide
Treatment: Drugs - taspoglutide

Active comparator: pioglitazone -

Experimental: taspoglutide 10mg - taspoglutide 10mg sc weekly

Experimental: taspoglutide 10mg/20mg - taspoglutide 20mg sc weekly after 4 weeks of taspoglutide 10mg sc weekly


Treatment: Drugs: pioglitazone
30mg po once daily for 4 weeks, followed by 45mg once daily

Treatment: Drugs: taspoglutide
10mg sc once weekly

Treatment: Drugs: taspoglutide
10mg sc once weekly for 4 weeks, followed by 20 mg sc once weekly
Intervention code [1] 0 0
Treatment: Drugs
Comparator / control treatment
Control group

Outcomes
Primary outcome [1] 0 0
Absolute change from baseline in HbA1c
Timepoint [1] 0 0
24 weeks
Secondary outcome [1] 0 0
Proportion of patients achieving target HbA1c <=6.5%, <=7%
Timepoint [1] 0 0
weeks 24, 52 and 104
Secondary outcome [2] 0 0
Absolute/percentage change from baseline in body weight; responder rate for body weight; absolute/percentage change from baseline in waist and hip circumference;absolute/percentage change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose
Timepoint [2] 0 0
weeks 24, 52 and 104
Secondary outcome [3] 0 0
Adverse events; laboratory parameters; cardiovascular events
Timepoint [3] 0 0
At each clinic visit up to 106 weeks

Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* adult patients, 18-75 years of age;
* type 2 diabetes mellitus;
* treated with stable sulfonylurea monotherapy or metformin + sulfonylurea for >=12 weeks prior to screening;
* HbA1c >=7.0% and <=10% at screening;
* stable weight +/-5% for >=12 weeks prior to screening.
Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
75 Years
Sex
Both males and females
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Key exclusion criteria
* type 1 diabetes, diabetes resulting from pancreatic injury, or secondary forms of diabetes;
* clinically significant diabetic complications;
* clinically symptomatic gastrointestinal disease;
* >3 episodes of severe hypoglycemia within 6 months before screening.

Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s


The people analysing the results/data
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Other design features
Phase
Phase 3
Type of endpoint/s
Statistical methods / analysis

Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Data analysis
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Other reasons
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
1/05/2009
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Actual
1/11/2010
Sample size
Target
Accrual to date
Final
756
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW
Recruitment hospital [1] 0 0
- Camperdown
Recruitment hospital [2] 0 0
- Wollongong
Recruitment postcode(s) [1] 0 0
2050 - Camperdown
Recruitment postcode(s) [2] 0 0
2500 - Wollongong
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [1] 0 0
California
Country [2] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [2] 0 0
Florida
Country [3] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [3] 0 0
Georgia
Country [4] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [4] 0 0
Illinois
Country [5] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [5] 0 0
Indiana
Country [6] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [6] 0 0
Kentucky
Country [7] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [7] 0 0
Louisiana
Country [8] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [8] 0 0
Maryland
Country [9] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [9] 0 0
Massachusetts
Country [10] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [10] 0 0
Michigan
Country [11] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [11] 0 0
Minnesota
Country [12] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [12] 0 0
Mississippi
Country [13] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [13] 0 0
Nebraska
Country [14] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [14] 0 0
New Jersey
Country [15] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [15] 0 0
New York
Country [16] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [16] 0 0
North Carolina
Country [17] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [17] 0 0
North Dakota
Country [18] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [18] 0 0
Oregon
Country [19] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [19] 0 0
Pennsylvania
Country [20] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [20] 0 0
Tennessee
Country [21] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [21] 0 0
Texas
Country [22] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [22] 0 0
Utah
Country [23] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [23] 0 0
Vermont
Country [24] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [24] 0 0
Virginia
Country [25] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [25] 0 0
Washington
Country [26] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [26] 0 0
Wisconsin
Country [27] 0 0
Brazil
State/province [27] 0 0
CE
Country [28] 0 0
Brazil
State/province [28] 0 0
DF
Country [29] 0 0
Brazil
State/province [29] 0 0
MG
Country [30] 0 0
Brazil
State/province [30] 0 0
SP
Country [31] 0 0
Canada
State/province [31] 0 0
British Columbia
Country [32] 0 0
Canada
State/province [32] 0 0
Ontario
Country [33] 0 0
Costa Rica
State/province [33] 0 0
San Jose
Country [34] 0 0
France
State/province [34] 0 0
Besancon
Country [35] 0 0
France
State/province [35] 0 0
Corbeil Essonnes
Country [36] 0 0
France
State/province [36] 0 0
Dommartin Les Toul
Country [37] 0 0
France
State/province [37] 0 0
La Rochelle
Country [38] 0 0
France
State/province [38] 0 0
Lille
Country [39] 0 0
France
State/province [39] 0 0
Poitiers
Country [40] 0 0
France
State/province [40] 0 0
Venissieux
Country [41] 0 0
Germany
State/province [41] 0 0
Berlin
Country [42] 0 0
Germany
State/province [42] 0 0
Essen
Country [43] 0 0
Germany
State/province [43] 0 0
Falkensee
Country [44] 0 0
Germany
State/province [44] 0 0
Mainz
Country [45] 0 0
Germany
State/province [45] 0 0
Münster
Country [46] 0 0
Germany
State/province [46] 0 0
Rodgau
Country [47] 0 0
Germany
State/province [47] 0 0
Siegen
Country [48] 0 0
Germany
State/province [48] 0 0
Sulzbach-Rosenberg
Country [49] 0 0
Germany
State/province [49] 0 0
Wangen
Country [50] 0 0
Mexico
State/province [50] 0 0
Aguascaliente
Country [51] 0 0
Mexico
State/province [51] 0 0
Celaya
Country [52] 0 0
Mexico
State/province [52] 0 0
Cuernavaca
Country [53] 0 0
Mexico
State/province [53] 0 0
Guadalajara
Country [54] 0 0
Mexico
State/province [54] 0 0
Mexico-City
Country [55] 0 0
Mexico
State/province [55] 0 0
Monterrey
Country [56] 0 0
New Zealand
State/province [56] 0 0
Auckland
Country [57] 0 0
Peru
State/province [57] 0 0
San Isidro
Country [58] 0 0
Poland
State/province [58] 0 0
Gdansk
Country [59] 0 0
Poland
State/province [59] 0 0
Krakow
Country [60] 0 0
Poland
State/province [60] 0 0
Lublin
Country [61] 0 0
Poland
State/province [61] 0 0
Wroclaw
Country [62] 0 0
Puerto Rico
State/province [62] 0 0
Rio Piedras
Country [63] 0 0
Russian Federation
State/province [63] 0 0
Moscow
Country [64] 0 0
Russian Federation
State/province [64] 0 0
Penza
Country [65] 0 0
Russian Federation
State/province [65] 0 0
S.Petersburg
Country [66] 0 0
Russian Federation
State/province [66] 0 0
Saint-Petersburg
Country [67] 0 0
Russian Federation
State/province [67] 0 0
Saratov
Country [68] 0 0
Russian Federation
State/province [68] 0 0
St. Petersburg
Country [69] 0 0
Russian Federation
State/province [69] 0 0
Voronezh
Country [70] 0 0
Russian Federation
State/province [70] 0 0
Yaroslavl
Country [71] 0 0
Slovakia
State/province [71] 0 0
Bratislava
Country [72] 0 0
Slovakia
State/province [72] 0 0
Dolny Kubin
Country [73] 0 0
Slovakia
State/province [73] 0 0
Levice
Country [74] 0 0
South Africa
State/province [74] 0 0
Cape Town
Country [75] 0 0
Spain
State/province [75] 0 0
Asturias
Country [76] 0 0
Spain
State/province [76] 0 0
Navarra
Country [77] 0 0
Spain
State/province [77] 0 0
Vizcaya
Country [78] 0 0
Spain
State/province [78] 0 0
Almeria
Country [79] 0 0
Spain
State/province [79] 0 0
Barcelona
Country [80] 0 0
Thailand
State/province [80] 0 0
Chiang Mai
Country [81] 0 0
Thailand
State/province [81] 0 0
Pathumthani
Country [82] 0 0
Thailand
State/province [82] 0 0
Songkla
Country [83] 0 0
Ukraine
State/province [83] 0 0
Kiev
Country [84] 0 0
Ukraine
State/province [84] 0 0
Odessa
Country [85] 0 0
Ukraine
State/province [85] 0 0
Vinnitsa
Country [86] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [86] 0 0
Atherstone
Country [87] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [87] 0 0
Birmingham
Country [88] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [88] 0 0
Chesterfield
Country [89] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [89] 0 0
Dumfries
Country [90] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [90] 0 0
Glasgow
Country [91] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [91] 0 0
Hinckley
Country [92] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [92] 0 0
Reading

Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Name
Hoffmann-La Roche
Address
Country

Ethics approval
Ethics application status

Summary
Brief summary
This double-blind, double-dummy 3 arm study will evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of taspoglutide versus pioglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with sulfonylurea monotherapy or sulfonylurea plus metformin combination therapy. After an initial screening period, patients will be randomized to one of 3 groups, to receive a)taspoglutide 10mg sc weekly, b)taspoglutide 20mg sc weekly after 4 weeks of taspoglutide 10mg sc weekly or c)pioglitazone 45mg/day po after 4 weeks of pioglitazone 30mg/day po.The anticipated time on study treatment is 24 months, and the target sample size is 500+ individuals.
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00909597
Trial related presentations / publications
Public notes

Contacts
Principal investigator
Name 0 0
Clinical Trials
Address 0 0
Hoffmann-La Roche
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Fax 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for public queries
Name 0 0
Address 0 0
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Fax 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for scientific queries



Summary Results

For IPD and results data, please see https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00909597