Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06849258
Registration number
NCT06849258
Ethics application status
Date submitted
17/02/2025
Date registered
27/02/2025
Date last updated
27/04/2025
Titles & IDs
Public title
A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the FloStent in Men With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Symptoms
Query!
Scientific title
A Prospective, Multicenter, Double Blind, Randomized, Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of The FloStent in Men Suffering From Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Symptoms
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
C0002 Rev. 07
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
RAPID-III
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Renal and Urogenital
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other renal and urogenital disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Devices - FloStent
Treatment: Devices - Sham (Control)
Experimental: Treatment - FloStent - Flexible cystoscopy procedure with FloStent implant deployed
Sham comparator: Sham Control - Flexible cystoscopy procedure without FloStent implant deployed
Treatment: Devices: FloStent
Flexible cystoscopy to deploy medical device used to treat BPH
Treatment: Devices: Sham (Control)
Flexible Cystoscopy without deployment of medical device used to treat BPH
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Change in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
The International Prostate Symptom Score IPSS is a self-questionnaire (patient reported outcome). It contains 7 questions about symptoms related to BPH and 1 question about the patient's perceived quality of life (QoL). The 7 questions are scored from 0 to 5. The sum of the 7 items gives the International Prostate Symptom Score in terms of severity (out of 35): 0-7 mildly symptomatic 8-19 moderately symptomatic 20-35 severely symptomatic
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Percent responders to IPSS
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
A responder is defined as a subject who has an IPSS improvement = 30% post-treatment as compared to baseline.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
3 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Percent responders to IPSS
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
A responder is defined as a subject who has an IPSS improvement = 30% post-treatment as compared to baseline.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
6 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Percent responders to IPSS
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
A responder is defined as a subject who has an IPSS improvement = 30% post-treatment as compared to baseline.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
12 months
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Male subjects > 45 years of age who have symptomatic BPH
* International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) score >13
* Peak urinary flow rate (Qmax): >5 mL/sec and <13 mL/sec with minimum voided volume of >125 mL
* Post-void residual (PVR) <250 mL
* Prostate volume 25 to 80 mL
* Prostatic urethral length 20-50 mm
* Able to complete the study protocol and visits
Query!
Minimum age
45
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Males
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Presence of an artificial urinary sphincter or stent(s) in the urethra or prostate
* Prior minimally invasive intervention or surgical intervention of the prostate or urethra
* PSA >10 ng/mL
* Bladder cancer or bladder stones
* Active urinary tract infection (UTI)
* Uncontrolled diabetes
* Part of a vulnerable population (cognitively challenged or are incarcerated)
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people administering the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
10/02/2025
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
31/12/2032
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
215
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
South Coast Urology - Wollongong
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
2500 - Wollongong
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Colorado
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Illinois
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Louisiana
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Michigan
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Nevada
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
North Carolina
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Tennessee
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Rivermark Medical
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The goal of this study is to determine the safety and effectiveness of the FloStent, a medical device used to treat men with symptoms of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, compared to sham (procedure without deployment of the FloStent). All participants will undergo a flexible cystoscopy and those randomized to the treatment arm will receive the FloStent, while those randomized to the sham arm will not receive the FloStent.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06849258
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Study Director, MD
Query!
Address
0
0
Rivermark Medical, Inc.
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Study Manager Study Director, MD
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
414-758-7948
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Data sharing statement
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results not provided in
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06849258
Download to PDF