Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06467357
Registration number
NCT06467357
Ethics application status
Date submitted
21/05/2024
Date registered
21/06/2024
Date last updated
24/06/2025
Titles & IDs
Public title
Phase 3 Study of T-DXd and Rilvegostomig Versus SoC in Advanced HER2-expressing Biliary Tract Cancer
Query!
Scientific title
DESTINY-Biliary Tract Cancer-01: A Phase 3 Study of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd) and Rilvegostomig Versus Standard-of-Care Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, and Durvalumab for First Line Locally Advanced or Metastatic HER2-expressing Biliary Tract Cancer
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2023-508057-19-00
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
D781PC00001
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
DESTINY-BTC01
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Biliary Tract Cancer
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Biliary tree (gall bladder and bile duct)
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Gemcitabine
Treatment: Drugs - Cisplatin
Treatment: Drugs - Durvalumab
Treatment: Drugs - Trastuzumab deruxtecan
Treatment: Drugs - Rilvegostomig
Diagnosis / Prognosis - Agilent HercepTestâ„¢ mAb pharmDx
Diagnosis / Prognosis - Ventana PD-L1 SP263 assay
Experimental: Trastuzumab deruxtecan + rilvegostomig - Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd; DS-8201a) in combination with rilvegostomig arm
Experimental: Trastuzumab deruxtecan - Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd; DS-8201a) arm
Active comparator: Standard of Care - Gemcitabine and cisplatin in combination with durvalumab arm
Treatment: Drugs: Gemcitabine
Standard of care chemotherapy by intravenous infusion
Treatment: Drugs: Cisplatin
Standard of care chemotherapy by intravenous infusion
Treatment: Drugs: Durvalumab
Standard of care immunotherapy by intravenous infusion
Treatment: Drugs: Trastuzumab deruxtecan
Experimental therapy by intravenous infusion
Treatment: Drugs: Rilvegostomig
Experimental therapy by intravenous infusion
Diagnosis / Prognosis: Agilent HercepTestâ„¢ mAb pharmDx
A semi-quantitative immunohistochemical assay to determine HER2 overexpression in FFPE breast cancer tissues routinely processed for histological evaluation.
Based on a primary monoclonal rabbit antibody which visualises Her2 overexpression utilising a fully automated IHC platform (Dako Omnis).
Diagnosis / Prognosis: Ventana PD-L1 SP263 assay
A qualitative immunohistochemical assay to determine the level of PD-L1 expression in FFPE non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tissues routinely processed for histological evaluation. Based on a rabbit monoclonal anti-PD-L1 clone SP263 which visualises PD-L1 protein using a VENTANA BenchMark ULTRA instrument
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Intervention code [2]
0
0
Diagnosis / Prognosis
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Safety Run In: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of T-DXd with rilvegostomig
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Safety and tolerability will be evaluated by the proportion of treated patients with occurrence of AEs, SAEs and AESIs, as assessed by CTCAE v5.0.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Until all patients have completed at least 1 full Cycle (each cycle is 21 days)
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
Randomized Portion: To evaluate the efficacy of T-DXd with rilvegostomig vs Standard of Care (SoC) in terms of Overall Survival in the FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) population
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Overall survival (OS) in FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) population OS is defined as time from randomization date until the date of death due to any cause. The comparison will include all randomized patients, regardless of whether the patient withdraws from therapy or receives another anticancer therapy. The measure of interest is the hazard ratio of OS.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
From date of treatment randomization until the date of death from any cause (estimated to be assessed up to 50 months after first subject randomized)
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
To evaluate the efficacy of T-DXd with rilvegostomig vs Standard of Care in terms of Overall Survival in the FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) population
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Overall Survival (OS) in FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) population. OS definition as above.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause (estimated to be assessed up to 50 months after first subject randomized)
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
To evaluate the efficacy of T-DXd monotherapy vs Standard of Care in terms of Overall Survival in the FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) population
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Overall Survival (OS) in FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) population. OS definition as above.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause (estimated to be assessed up to 50 months after first subject randomized)
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
To evaluate the efficacy of T-DXd monotherapy vs Standard of Care in terms of Overall Survival in the FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) population
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Overall Survival (OS) in FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) population. OS definition as above.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause (estimated to be assessed up to 50 months after first subject randomized)
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
To further evaluate efficacy of T-DXd with rilvegostomig vs Standard of Care in terms of Progression Free Survival in FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) and FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) populations
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Progression free survival (PFS) in FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) and FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) populations. PFS is defined as time from randomization until progression per RECIST v1.1, or death due to any cause. The analysis will include all randomized patients, regardless of whether the patient withdraws from randomized therapy, receives another anticancer therapy or clinically progresses prior to RECIST v1.1 progression. The measure of interest is the hazard ratio of PFS.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever occurs first (estimated to be assessed up to 50 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
To further evaluate efficacy of T-DXd monotherapy vs Standard of Care in terms of Progression Free Survival in FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) and FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) populations
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Progression free survival (PFS) in FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) and FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) populations. PFS is defined as time from randomization until progression per RECIST v1.1, or death due to any cause. The analysis will include all randomized patients, regardless of whether the patient withdraws from randomized therapy, receives another anticancer therapy or clinically progresses prior to RECIST v1.1 progression. The measure of interest is the hazard ratio of PFS.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever occurs first (estimated to be assessed up to 50 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
To further evaluate the efficacy of T-DXd with rilvegostomig vs Standrad of Care in terms of objective response rate in the FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) and FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) populations
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Objective response rate (ORR) in FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) and FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) populations. ORR is defined as the proportion of patients who achieved CR or PR per RECIST 1.1, as assessed by the investigator. The analysis will include objective response data for all randomized patients from randomization until progression, or up to the last evaluable assessment in the absence of progression. Patients who go off-treatment without a response or progression and then respond while receiving a subsequent therapy will not be included as responders in the ORR calculation. The measure of interest is the risk difference of ORR.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever occurs first (estimated to be assessed up to 50 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
To further evaluate the efficacy of T-DXd monotherapy vs Standrad of Care in terms of objective response rate in the FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) and FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) populations
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
Objective response rate (ORR) in FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) and FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) populations. ORR is defined as the proportion of patients who achieved CR or PR per RECIST 1.1, as assessed by the investigator. The analysis will include objective response data for all randomized patients from randomization until progression, or up to the last evaluable assessment in the absence of progression. Patients who go off-treatment without a response or progression and then respond while receiving a subsequent therapy will not be included as responders in the ORR calculation. The measure of interest is the risk difference of ORR.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever occurs first (estimated to be assessed up to 50 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
To further evaluate efficacy of T-DXd with rilvegostomig vs Standard if Care in terms of duration of response in patients with HER2-expressing BTC in the FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) and FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) populations
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
Duration of response (DoR) in FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) and FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) populations. DoR will be defined as the time from the date of first documented response until date of documented progression per RECIST v1.1, or death due to any cause. The analysis will include all randomized patients who have a response, regardless of whether the patient withdraws from randomized therapy, receives another anti-cancer therapy or clinically progresses prior to RECIST v1.1 progression. The measure of interest is the median DoR.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
From the date of first documented response until date of documented progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (estimated up to 50 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
To further evaluate efficacy of T-DXd monotherapy vs Standard if Care in terms of duration of response in patients with HER2-expressing BTC in the FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) and FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) populations
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
Duration of response (DoR) in FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) and FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) populations. DoR will be defined as the time from the date of first documented response until date of documented progression per RECIST v1.1, or death due to any cause. The analysis will include all randomized patients who have a response, regardless of whether the patient withdraws from randomized therapy, receives another anti-cancer therapy or clinically progresses prior to RECIST v1.1 progression. The measure of interest is the median DoR.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
From the date of first documented response until date of documented progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (estimated up to 50 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
To further evaluate the efficacy of T-DXd with rilvegostomig versus T-DXd monotherapy in terms of Overall survival in FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) and FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) populations.
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
Overall survival (OS) in FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) and FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) populations. OS is defined as time from randomization date until the date of death due to any cause. The comparison will include all randomized patients, regardless of whether the patient withdraws from therapy or receives another anticancer therapy. The measure of interest is the hazard ratio of OS.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause (estimated to be assessed up to 50 months after first subject randomized)
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
To further evaluate the efficacy of T-DXd with rilvegostomig versus T-DXd monotherapy in terms of PFS in FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) and FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) populations
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
Progression free survival (PFS) in FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) and FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) populations. PFS is defined as time from randomization until progression per RECIST v1.1, or death due to any cause. The analysis will include all randomized patients, regardless of whether the patient withdraws from randomized therapy, receives another anticancer therapy or clinically progresses prior to RECIST v1.1 progression. The measure of interest is the hazard ratio of PFS.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
From the date of randomisation until progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (estimated up to 50 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
To further evaluate the efficacy of T-DXd with rilvegostomig versus T-DXd monotherapy in terms of Duration of response in FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) and FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) populations
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
Duration of response (DoR) in FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) and FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) populations. DoR will be defined as the time from the date of first documented response until date of documented progression per RECIST v1.1, or death due to any cause. The analysis will include all randomized patients who have a response, regardless of whether the patient withdraws from randomized therapy, receives another anti-cancer therapy or clinically progresses prior to RECIST v1.1 progression. The measure of interest is the median DoR.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
From the date of first response until progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (estimated up to 50 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
To further evaluate the efficacy of T-DXd with rilvegostomig versus T-DXd monotherapy in terms of Objective response rate in FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) and FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) populations
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
Objective response rate (ORR) in FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) and FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) populations. ORR is defined as the proportion of patients who achieved CR or PR per RECIST 1.1, as assessed by the investigator. The analysis will include objective response data for all randomized patients from randomization until progression, or up to the last evaluable assessment in the absence of progression. Patients who go off-treatment without a response or progression and then respond while receiving a subsequent therapy will not be included as responders in the ORR calculation. The measure of interest is the risk difference of ORR.
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever occurs first (estimated to be assessed up to 50 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
To assess the safety and tolerability of T-DXd with rilvegostomig vs Standard of Care
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
Safety and tolerability will be evaluated by the proportion of treated patients with occurrence of AEs, SAEs and AESIs, as assessed by CTCAE v5.0.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever occurs first (estimated to be assessed up to 50 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
To assess the safety and tolerability of T-DXd monotherapy vs Standard of Care
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
Safety and tolerability will be evaluated by the proportion of treated patients with occurrence of AEs, SAEs and AESIs, as assessed by CTCAE v5.0.
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever occurs first (estimated to be assessed up to 50 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
0
0
To describe patient-reported tolerability of T-DXd with rilvegostomig in comparison to Standard of Care based on a summary of symptomatic AEs
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
Patient-reported tolerability will be described using the Symptomatic adverse events: Descriptive summary of the proportion of patients reporting symptomatic AEs while on treatment using items from the EORTC Item Library (on EORTC IL form 322).
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
Until End of Study (estimated up to 50 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
0
0
To describe patient-reported tolerability of T-DXd monotherapy in comparison to SoC based on a summary of symptomatic AEs
Query!
Assessment method [17]
0
0
Patient-reported tolerability will be described using the Symptomatic adverse events: Descriptive summary of the proportion of patients reporting symptomatic AEs while on treatment using items from the EORTC Item Library (on EORTC IL form 322)
Query!
Timepoint [17]
0
0
Until End of Study (estimated up to 50 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
0
0
To describe patient-reported tolerability of T-DXd with rilvegostomig in comparison to T-DXd monotherapy based on a summary of symptomatic AEs
Query!
Assessment method [18]
0
0
Patient-reported tolerability will be described using the Symptomatic adverse events: Descriptive summary of the proportion of patients reporting symptomatic AEs while on treatment using items from the EORTC Item Library (on EORTC IL form 322).
Query!
Timepoint [18]
0
0
Until End of Study (estimated up to 50 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [19]
0
0
To assess time to deterioration in physical functioning in patients treated with T-DXd with rilvegostomig vs Standard of Care
Query!
Assessment method [19]
0
0
Time to deterioration (TTD) in physical function as measured by the PROMIS Short Form v2.0 - Physical Function 8c - TTD is defined as time from the date of randomization to the date of deterioration. Deterioration is defined as the change from baseline that reaches a clinically meaningful deterioration threshold. - The measure of interest is the HR of TTD in physical function. The analysis will include all randomized patients as randomized.
Query!
Timepoint [19]
0
0
Until End of Study (estimated up to 50 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [20]
0
0
To assess time to deterioration in physical functioning in patients treated with T-DXd monotherapy vs Standard of care
Query!
Assessment method [20]
0
0
Time to deterioration (TTD) in physical function as measured by the PROMIS Short Form v2.0 - Physical Function 8c - TTD is defined as time from the date of randomization to the date of deterioration. Deterioration is defined as the change from baseline that reaches a clinically meaningful deterioration threshold. - The measure of interest is the HR of TTD in physical function. The analysis will include all randomized patients as randomized.
Query!
Timepoint [20]
0
0
Until End of Study (estimated up to 50 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [21]
0
0
To assess time to deterioration in physical functioning in patients treated with T-DXd with rilvegostomig vs T-DXd monotherapy
Query!
Assessment method [21]
0
0
Time to deterioration (TTD) in physical function as measured by the PROMIS Short Form v2.0 - Physical Function 8c - TTD is defined as time from the date of randomization to the date of deterioration. Deterioration is defined as the change from baseline that reaches a clinically meaningful deterioration threshold. - The measure of interest is the HR of TTD in physical function. The analysis will include all randomized patients as randomized.
Query!
Timepoint [21]
0
0
Until End of Study (estimated up to 50 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [22]
0
0
To assess the pharmacokinetics of T-DXd, total anti- HER2 antibody, DXd and rilvegostomig in serum
Query!
Assessment method [22]
0
0
Descriptive analysis of serum concentration of T-DXd, total anti-HER2 antibody, DXd and rilvegostomig in all applicable arms.
Query!
Timepoint [22]
0
0
From the time of informed consent until 90 days after the last dose of T-DXd and rilvegostomig
Query!
Secondary outcome [23]
0
0
To investigate the immunogenicity of T-DXd and of rilvegostomig
Query!
Assessment method [23]
0
0
Descriptive summary of presence of ADAs for T-DXd and rilvegostomig in all applicable arms.
Query!
Timepoint [23]
0
0
From the time of informed consent until 30 and 90 days after the last dose of T-DXd and rilvegostomig, respectively
Query!
Secondary outcome [24]
0
0
To describe patient-reported tolerability of T-DXd with rilvegostomig in comparison to Standard of Care based on overall side-effect bother
Query!
Assessment method [24]
0
0
Patient-reported tolerability will be described using the Overall side-effect bother that will be mesured using PGI-TT
Query!
Timepoint [24]
0
0
Until End of Study (estimated up to 50 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [25]
0
0
To describe patient-reported tolerability of T-DXd monotherapy in comparison to SoC based on overall side-effect bother
Query!
Assessment method [25]
0
0
Patient-reported tolerability will be described using the Overall side-effect bother that will be assessed will be mesured using PGI-TT
Query!
Timepoint [25]
0
0
Until End of Study (estimated up to 50 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [26]
0
0
To assess the safety and tolerability of T-DXd with rilvegostomig vs T-DXd monotherapy
Query!
Assessment method [26]
0
0
Safety and tolerability will be evaluated by the proportion of treated patients with occurrence of AEs, SAEs and AESIs, as assessed by CTCAE v5.0.
Query!
Timepoint [26]
0
0
From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever occurs first (estimated to be assessed up to 50 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [27]
0
0
To describe patient-reported tolerability of T-DXd with rilvegostmog in comparison to T-DXd monotherapy based on overall side-effect bother
Query!
Assessment method [27]
0
0
Patient-reported tolerability will be described using the Overall side-effect bother that will be assessed will be mesured using PGI-TT.
Query!
Timepoint [27]
0
0
Until End of Study (estimated up to 50 months)
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Key
* Participants must be = 18 years of age at the time of screening. Other age restrictions may apply as per local regulations;
* Male and female;
* Unresectable, previously untreated, locally advanced or metastatic BTC. Prior treatment in the perioperative and/or adjuvant setting is permissible provided there is > 6 months (180 days) between the end of adjuvant treatment and the diagnosis of locally advanced or metastatic disease.
* histologically confirmed HER2-expressing (IHC 3+ or IHC 2+) BTC;
* Provision of FFPE tumor sample that is no older than 3 years;
* At least one target lesion assessed by the Investigator based on RECIST v1.1 (randomized portion only);
* WHO/ECOG performance status of 0 or 1;
* Adequate organ and bone marrow function within 14 days before randomization;
* Evidence of post-menopausal status or negative serum pregnancy test for females of childbearing potential;
Key
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
99
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Prior exposure to other HER2 targeting therapies, ADCs, immune checkpoint inhibitors and therapeutic anticancer vaccines;
* histologically confirmed ampullary carcinoma;
* history of substance abuse or any other medical conditions such as clinically significant cardiac or psychological conditions;
* spinal cord compression or clinically active central nervous system metastases, defined as untreated and symptomatic, or requiring therapy with corticosteroids or anticonvulsants to control associated symptoms;
* medical history of myocardial infarction within 6 months before randomization/enrollment, symptomatic congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association Class II to IV), unstable angina pectoris, clinically important cardiac arrhythmias, or a recent (< 6 months) cardiovascular event including stroke;
* Serious chronic gastrointestinal conditions associated with diarrhea (eg, active inflammatory bowel disease); active non-infectious skin disease (including any grade rash, urticaria, dermatitis, ulceration, or psoriasis) requiring systemic treatment;
* active autoimmune, connective tissue or inflammatory disorders that has required systemic treatment in the past 2 years, or where there is documented, or a suspicion of pulmonary involvement at the time of screening;
* Corrected QT interval (QTcF) prolongation to > 470 msec (females) or > 450 msec (males) based on average of the screening triplicate 12-lead ECG;
* History of (non-infectious) ILD/pneumonitis, has current ILD/pneumonitis, or where suspected ILD/pneumonitis cannot be ruled out by imaging at screening;
* Lung-specific intercurrent clinically significant illnesses including, but not limited to, any underlying pulmonary disorder;
* Prior pneumonectomy (complete);
* Uncontrolled infection requiring IV antibiotics, antivirals, or antifungals;
* Active primary immunodeficiency, known uncontrolled active HIV infection or HCV;
* Pregnant or breastfeeding female patients, or patients who are planning to become pregnant;
* Participation in another clinical study with a study intervention or investigational medicinal device administered in the last 6 months prior to randomization, or concurrent enrollment in another clinical study, unless it is an observational (non-interventional) clinical study or during the follow-up period of an interventional study (only randomized portion).
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
12/08/2024
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
16/05/2029
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
620
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Research Site - Clayton
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
Research Site - Concord
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
Research Site - Nedlands
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
3168 - Clayton
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
2139 - Concord
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
6009 - Nedlands
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Arizona
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Georgia
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Idaho
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Illinois
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Maryland
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Massachusetts
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Michigan
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Minnesota
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Missouri
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
New Mexico
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Ohio
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
South Carolina
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Tennessee
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Virginia
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
Austria
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Graz
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
Austria
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Linz
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
Austria
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Salzburg
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
Austria
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Wiener Neustadt
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Austria
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Wien
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Anderlecht
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Edegem
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Gent
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Leuven
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Liège
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Roeselare
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Natal
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Porto Alegre
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Santa Maria
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Sao Paulo
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Vitória
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Alberta
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Nova Scotia
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Ontario
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Quebec
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Beijing
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Bengbu
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Changchun
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Changde
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Changsha
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Chengdu
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Chongqing
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Fuzhou
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Guangzhou
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Guiyang
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Hangzhou
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Harbin
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Hefei
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Jinan
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Luoyang
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Nanchang
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Nanning
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Nantong
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Shanghai
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
Shenyang
Query!
Country [59]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [59]
0
0
Shenzhen
Query!
Country [60]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [60]
0
0
Tianjin
Query!
Country [61]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [61]
0
0
Wuhan
Query!
Country [62]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [62]
0
0
Xi'an
Query!
Country [63]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [63]
0
0
Zhengzhou
Query!
Country [64]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [64]
0
0
Brno
Query!
Country [65]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [65]
0
0
Hradec Kralove
Query!
Country [66]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [66]
0
0
Olomouc
Query!
Country [67]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [67]
0
0
Praha 10
Query!
Country [68]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [68]
0
0
Praha 5
Query!
Country [69]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [69]
0
0
Brest
Query!
Country [70]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [70]
0
0
Clichy Cedex
Query!
Country [71]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [71]
0
0
Dijon
Query!
Country [72]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [72]
0
0
Lille
Query!
Country [73]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [73]
0
0
Lyon
Query!
Country [74]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [74]
0
0
Marseille
Query!
Country [75]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [75]
0
0
Montpellier
Query!
Country [76]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [76]
0
0
Nimes
Query!
Country [77]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [77]
0
0
Pessac
Query!
Country [78]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [78]
0
0
Villejuif
Query!
Country [79]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [79]
0
0
Berlin
Query!
Country [80]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [80]
0
0
Bonn
Query!
Country [81]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [81]
0
0
Dresden
Query!
Country [82]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [82]
0
0
Frankfurt
Query!
Country [83]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [83]
0
0
Freiburg
Query!
Country [84]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [84]
0
0
Göttingen
Query!
Country [85]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [85]
0
0
Hamburg
Query!
Country [86]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [86]
0
0
Köln
Query!
Country [87]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [87]
0
0
Leipzig
Query!
Country [88]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [88]
0
0
Lübeck
Query!
Country [89]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [89]
0
0
Munchen
Query!
Country [90]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [90]
0
0
Ulm
Query!
Country [91]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [91]
0
0
Wuerzburg
Query!
Country [92]
0
0
Hong Kong
Query!
State/province [92]
0
0
Hong Kong
Query!
Country [93]
0
0
Hong Kong
Query!
State/province [93]
0
0
Shatin
Query!
Country [94]
0
0
India
Query!
State/province [94]
0
0
Dehradun
Query!
Country [95]
0
0
India
Query!
State/province [95]
0
0
Delhi
Query!
Country [96]
0
0
India
Query!
State/province [96]
0
0
Kolkata
Query!
Country [97]
0
0
India
Query!
State/province [97]
0
0
Mumbai
Query!
Country [98]
0
0
India
Query!
State/province [98]
0
0
Vadodara
Query!
Country [99]
0
0
India
Query!
State/province [99]
0
0
Varanasi
Query!
Country [100]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [100]
0
0
Firenze
Query!
Country [101]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [101]
0
0
Milano
Query!
Country [102]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [102]
0
0
Naples
Query!
Country [103]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [103]
0
0
Napoli
Query!
Country [104]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [104]
0
0
Padova
Query!
Country [105]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [105]
0
0
Roma
Query!
Country [106]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [106]
0
0
Rozzano
Query!
Country [107]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [107]
0
0
Tricase
Query!
Country [108]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [108]
0
0
Bunkyo-ku
Query!
Country [109]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [109]
0
0
Chiba-shi
Query!
Country [110]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [110]
0
0
Fukuyama-shi
Query!
Country [111]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [111]
0
0
Hirakata-shi
Query!
Country [112]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [112]
0
0
Hiroshima-shi
Query!
Country [113]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [113]
0
0
Kanazawa
Query!
Country [114]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [114]
0
0
Kashiwa
Query!
Country [115]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [115]
0
0
Kawasaki-shi
Query!
Country [116]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [116]
0
0
Kita-gun
Query!
Country [117]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [117]
0
0
Kitaadachi-gun
Query!
Country [118]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [118]
0
0
Koto-ku
Query!
Country [119]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [119]
0
0
Kumamoto-shi
Query!
Country [120]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [120]
0
0
Kyoto-shi
Query!
Country [121]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [121]
0
0
Maebashi-shi
Query!
Country [122]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [122]
0
0
Mitaka-shi
Query!
Country [123]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [123]
0
0
Nagoya-shi
Query!
Country [124]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [124]
0
0
Osaka-shi
Query!
Country [125]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [125]
0
0
Osaka
Query!
Country [126]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [126]
0
0
Sakai-shi
Query!
Country [127]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [127]
0
0
Sapporo-shi
Query!
Country [128]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [128]
0
0
Sendai-shi
Query!
Country [129]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [129]
0
0
Shinjuku-ku
Query!
Country [130]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [130]
0
0
Suita-city
Query!
Country [131]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [131]
0
0
Sunto-gun
Query!
Country [132]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [132]
0
0
Ube-shi
Query!
Country [133]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [133]
0
0
Wakayama-shi
Query!
Country [134]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [134]
0
0
Yokohama-shi
Query!
Country [135]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [135]
0
0
Busan
Query!
Country [136]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [136]
0
0
Gyeonggi-do
Query!
Country [137]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [137]
0
0
Hwasun-gun
Query!
Country [138]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [138]
0
0
Seongnam-si
Query!
Country [139]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [139]
0
0
Seoul
Query!
Country [140]
0
0
Malaysia
Query!
State/province [140]
0
0
George Town
Query!
Country [141]
0
0
Malaysia
Query!
State/province [141]
0
0
Johor Bahru
Query!
Country [142]
0
0
Malaysia
Query!
State/province [142]
0
0
Kuala Lumpur
Query!
Country [143]
0
0
Malaysia
Query!
State/province [143]
0
0
Kuching
Query!
Country [144]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [144]
0
0
Rotterdam
Query!
Country [145]
0
0
Philippines
Query!
State/province [145]
0
0
Cebu City
Query!
Country [146]
0
0
Philippines
Query!
State/province [146]
0
0
Makati
Query!
Country [147]
0
0
Philippines
Query!
State/province [147]
0
0
Pasig City
Query!
Country [148]
0
0
Philippines
Query!
State/province [148]
0
0
Quezon City
Query!
Country [149]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [149]
0
0
Bialystok
Query!
Country [150]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [150]
0
0
Katowice
Query!
Country [151]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [151]
0
0
Kraków
Query!
Country [152]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [152]
0
0
Lublin
Query!
Country [153]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [153]
0
0
Warszawa
Query!
Country [154]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [154]
0
0
Wroclaw
Query!
Country [155]
0
0
Saudi Arabia
Query!
State/province [155]
0
0
Ar Riya?
Query!
Country [156]
0
0
Saudi Arabia
Query!
State/province [156]
0
0
Dammam
Query!
Country [157]
0
0
Saudi Arabia
Query!
State/province [157]
0
0
Riyadh
Query!
Country [158]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [158]
0
0
Banska Bystrica
Query!
Country [159]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [159]
0
0
Bratislava
Query!
Country [160]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [160]
0
0
Kosice
Query!
Country [161]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [161]
0
0
Martin
Query!
Country [162]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [162]
0
0
Trnava
Query!
Country [163]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [163]
0
0
Barcelona
Query!
Country [164]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [164]
0
0
Madrid
Query!
Country [165]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [165]
0
0
Málaga
Query!
Country [166]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [166]
0
0
Santander
Query!
Country [167]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [167]
0
0
Kaohsiung City
Query!
Country [168]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [168]
0
0
Kaohsiung
Query!
Country [169]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [169]
0
0
Taichung
Query!
Country [170]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [170]
0
0
Taipei 112
Query!
Country [171]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [171]
0
0
Taipei
Query!
Country [172]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [172]
0
0
Taoyuan
Query!
Country [173]
0
0
Thailand
Query!
State/province [173]
0
0
Bangkok
Query!
Country [174]
0
0
Thailand
Query!
State/province [174]
0
0
Hat Yai
Query!
Country [175]
0
0
Thailand
Query!
State/province [175]
0
0
Khon Kaen
Query!
Country [176]
0
0
Thailand
Query!
State/province [176]
0
0
Muang
Query!
Country [177]
0
0
Thailand
Query!
State/province [177]
0
0
Mueang
Query!
Country [178]
0
0
Thailand
Query!
State/province [178]
0
0
Naimuang
Query!
Country [179]
0
0
Thailand
Query!
State/province [179]
0
0
Ongkharak
Query!
Country [180]
0
0
Thailand
Query!
State/province [180]
0
0
Sisaket
Query!
Country [181]
0
0
Turkey
Query!
State/province [181]
0
0
Altindag
Query!
Country [182]
0
0
Turkey
Query!
State/province [182]
0
0
Antalya
Query!
Country [183]
0
0
Turkey
Query!
State/province [183]
0
0
Istanbul
Query!
Country [184]
0
0
Turkey
Query!
State/province [184]
0
0
Izmir
Query!
Country [185]
0
0
Turkey
Query!
State/province [185]
0
0
Mezitli
Query!
Country [186]
0
0
Turkey
Query!
State/province [186]
0
0
Yakutiye
Query!
Country [187]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [187]
0
0
Birmingham
Query!
Country [188]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [188]
0
0
Dundee
Query!
Country [189]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [189]
0
0
Glasgow
Query!
Country [190]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [190]
0
0
Greater London
Query!
Country [191]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [191]
0
0
Leeds
Query!
Country [192]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [192]
0
0
London
Query!
Country [193]
0
0
Vietnam
Query!
State/province [193]
0
0
Hanoi
Query!
Country [194]
0
0
Vietnam
Query!
State/province [194]
0
0
Ho Chi Minh city
Query!
Country [195]
0
0
Vietnam
Query!
State/province [195]
0
0
Ho Chi Minh City
Query!
Country [196]
0
0
Vietnam
Query!
State/province [196]
0
0
Ho Chi Minh
Query!
Country [197]
0
0
Vietnam
Query!
State/province [197]
0
0
Vinh
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
AstraZeneca
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to measure the efficacy and safety of T-DXd with rilvegostomig or T-DXd monotherapy compared with gemcitabine plus cisplatin and durvalumab in patients with advanced treatment naïve HER2-expressing BTC.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06467357
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
AstraZeneca Clinical Study Information Center
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
1-877-240-9479
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Data sharing statement
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results not provided in
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06467357
Download to PDF