Trial Review

Did you know?

The ANZCTR now automatically displays published trial results and simplifies the addition of trial documents such as unpublished protocols and statistical analysis plans.

These enhancements will offer a more comprehensive view of trials, regardless of whether their results are positive, negative, or inconclusive.

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov

For full trial details, please see the original record at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00833417




Registration number
NCT00833417
Ethics application status
Date submitted
30/01/2009
Date registered
2/02/2009
Date last updated
20/05/2015

Titles & IDs
Public title
A Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Vismodegib (GDC-0449, Hedgehog Pathway Inhibitor) in Patients With Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma
Scientific title
A Pivotal Phase II, Multicenter, Single-arm, Two-cohort Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0449 in Patients With Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma
Secondary ID [1] 0 0
GO01541
Secondary ID [2] 0 0
SHH4476g
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Trial acronym
Linked study record

Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Basal Cell Carcinoma 0 0
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer 0 0 0 0
Non melanoma skin cancer
Cancer 0 0 0 0
Kidney

Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Vismodegib 150 mg

Experimental: Vismodegib 150 mg - Patients received vismodegib 150 mg orally once daily until disease progression; intolerable toxicity, most probably attributable to vismodegib; or withdrawal from the study.


Treatment: Drugs: Vismodegib 150 mg
Vismodegib 150 mg was provided in hard gelatin capsules.
Intervention code [1] 0 0
Treatment: Drugs
Comparator / control treatment
Control group

Outcomes
Primary outcome [1] 0 0
Objective Response (OR) Determined by the Independent Review Facility
Timepoint [1] 0 0
From study initiation (enrollment of first patient) through 9 months following the first treatment of the last enrolled patient (clinical cutoff date of 26 November 2010), up to 90 weeks
Secondary outcome [1] 0 0
Duration of Objective Response (OR) Determined by the Independent Review Facility
Timepoint [1] 0 0
From study initiation (enrollment of first patient) through 9 months following the first treatment of the last enrolled patient (clinical cutoff date of 26 November 2010), up to 90 weeks
Secondary outcome [2] 0 0
Progression-free Survival (PFS) Determined by the Independent Review Facility
Timepoint [2] 0 0
From study initiation (enrollment of first patient) through 9 months following the first treatment of the last enrolled patient (clinical cutoff date of 26 November 2010), up to 90 weeks
Secondary outcome [3] 0 0
Overall Survival
Timepoint [3] 0 0
From study initiation (enrollment of first patient) through 9 months following the first treatment of the last enrolled patient (clinical cutoff date of 26 November 2010), up to 90 weeks
Secondary outcome [4] 0 0
Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey Scores
Timepoint [4] 0 0
Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, and at the end of the study or early termination visit, up to 90 weeks
Secondary outcome [5] 0 0
Percentage of Patients With Absence of Residual Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC) in Patients With Locally Advanced BCC
Timepoint [5] 0 0
From baseline through end of the study, up to 90 weeks

Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Men and women = 18 years of age.
* For patients with metastatic basal cell carcinoma (BCC), histological confirmation of distant BCC metastasis (eg, lung, liver, lymph nodes, or bone), with metastatic disease that is Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) measurable using computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
* For patients with locally advanced BCC, histologically confirmed disease that is considered to be inoperable.
* For patients with locally advanced BCC, radiotherapy must have been previously administered for their locally advanced BCC, unless radiotherapy is contraindicated or inappropriate. For patients whose locally advanced BCC has been irradiated, disease must have progressed after radiation.
* For women of childbearing potential, agreement to the use of two acceptable methods of contraception, including one barrier method, during the study and for 12 months after discontinuation of vismodegib (GDC-0449).
* For men with female partners of childbearing potential, agreement to use a latex condom, and to advise their female partner to use an additional method of contraception during the study and for 3 months after discontinuation of vismodegib.
Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
No limit
Sex
Both males and females
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Key exclusion criteria
* Prior treatment with vismodegib or other Hedgehog pathway inhibitors.
* Pregnancy or lactation.
* Life expectancy of < 12 weeks.
* Patients with superficial multifocal BCC who may be considered unresectable due to breadth of involvement.
* Concurrent non-protocol-specified anti-tumor therapy (eg, chemotherapy, other targeted therapy, radiation therapy, or photodynamic therapy).
* Recent, current, or planned participation in an experimental drug study.
* History of other malignancies within 3 years of the first day of treatment with vismodegib in this study (Day 1), except for tumors with a negligible risk for metastasis or death, such as adequately treated squamous-cell carcinoma of the skin, ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast, or carcinoma in situ of the cervix.
* Uncontrolled medical illnesses such as infection requiring treatment with intravenous antibiotics.

Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Allocation to intervention
Not applicable
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Who is / are masked / blinded?



Intervention assignment
Single group
Other design features
Phase
Phase 2
Type of endpoint/s
Statistical methods / analysis

Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Data analysis
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Other reasons
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
1/02/2009
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Actual
1/04/2014
Sample size
Target
Accrual to date
Final
104
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Recruitment hospital [1] 0 0
- Kogarah, New South Wales
Recruitment hospital [2] 0 0
- Melbourne
Recruitment hospital [3] 0 0
- Woolloongabba
Recruitment postcode(s) [1] 0 0
2217 - Kogarah, New South Wales
Recruitment postcode(s) [2] 0 0
3002 - Melbourne
Recruitment postcode(s) [3] 0 0
4102 - Woolloongabba
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [1] 0 0
Arizona
Country [2] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [2] 0 0
California
Country [3] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [3] 0 0
Colorado
Country [4] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [4] 0 0
Florida
Country [5] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [5] 0 0
Illinois
Country [6] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [6] 0 0
Iowa
Country [7] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [7] 0 0
Maryland
Country [8] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [8] 0 0
Massachusetts
Country [9] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [9] 0 0
Minnesota
Country [10] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [10] 0 0
Nevada
Country [11] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [11] 0 0
New Hampshire
Country [12] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [12] 0 0
New York
Country [13] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [13] 0 0
North Carolina
Country [14] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [14] 0 0
Ohio
Country [15] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [15] 0 0
Pennsylvania
Country [16] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [16] 0 0
Tennessee
Country [17] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [17] 0 0
Texas
Country [18] 0 0
Belgium
State/province [18] 0 0
Bruxelles
Country [19] 0 0
Belgium
State/province [19] 0 0
Wilrijk
Country [20] 0 0
France
State/province [20] 0 0
Lille
Country [21] 0 0
France
State/province [21] 0 0
Nantes Cedex 1
Country [22] 0 0
France
State/province [22] 0 0
Paris
Country [23] 0 0
France
State/province [23] 0 0
Pierre Benite
Country [24] 0 0
Germany
State/province [24] 0 0
Essen
Country [25] 0 0
Germany
State/province [25] 0 0
Kiel
Country [26] 0 0
Germany
State/province [26] 0 0
Tübingen
Country [27] 0 0
Germany
State/province [27] 0 0
Wurzburg
Country [28] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [28] 0 0
London
Country [29] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [29] 0 0
Poole

Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Name
Genentech, Inc.
Address
Country

Ethics approval
Ethics application status

Summary
Brief summary
This was a Phase II, single-arm, two-cohort multicenter clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of vismodegib (GDC-0449) in patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma. All patients received vismodegib until evidence of progression, intolerable toxicities most probably attributable to vismodegib, or withdrawal from the study.
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00833417
Trial related presentations / publications
Sekulic A, Migden MR, Basset-Seguin N, Garbe C, Gesierich A, Lao CD, Miller C, Mortier L, Murrell DF, Hamid O, Quevedo JF, Hou J, McKenna E, Dimier N, Williams S, Schadendorf D, Hauschild A; ERIVANCE BCC Investigators. Long-term safety and efficacy of vismodegib in patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma: final update of the pivotal ERIVANCE BCC study. BMC Cancer. 2017 May 16;17(1):332. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3286-5. Erratum In: BMC Cancer. 2019 Apr 18;19(1):366. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5568-6.
Chang AL, Arron ST, Migden MR, Solomon JA, Yoo S, Day BM, McKenna EF, Sekulic A. Safety and efficacy of vismodegib in patients with basal cell carcinoma nevus syndrome: pooled analysis of two trials. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2016 Sep 1;11(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s13023-016-0506-z.
Sekulic A, Migden MR, Oro AE, Dirix L, Lewis KD, Hainsworth JD, Solomon JA, Yoo S, Arron ST, Friedlander PA, Marmur E, Rudin CM, Chang AL, Low JA, Mackey HM, Yauch RL, Graham RA, Reddy JC, Hauschild A. Efficacy and safety of vismodegib in advanced basal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jun 7;366(23):2171-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1113713.
Public notes

Contacts
Principal investigator
Name 0 0
Jeannie Hou, M.D.
Address 0 0
Genentech, Inc.
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Fax 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for public queries
Name 0 0
Address 0 0
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Fax 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for scientific queries



Summary Results

For IPD and results data, please see https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00833417