Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04427072
Registration number
NCT04427072
Ethics application status
Date submitted
9/06/2020
Date registered
11/06/2020
Date last updated
16/05/2025
Titles & IDs
Public title
Study of Capmatinib Efficacy in Comparison With Docetaxel in Previously Treated Participants With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring MET Exon 14 Skipping Mutation
Query!
Scientific title
A Phase III, Randomized, Controlled, Open-label, Multicenter, Global Study of Capmatinib Versus SoC Docetaxel Chemotherapy in Previously Treated Patients With EGFR wt, ALK Negative, Locally Advanced or Metastatic (Stage IIIB/IIIC or IV) NSCLC Harboring MET Exon 14 Skipping Mutation (MET?ex14).
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2020-001578-31
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
CINC280A2301
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
GeoMETry-III
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Lung - Non small cell
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Capmatinib
Treatment: Drugs - Docetaxel
Experimental: Capmatinib - 400 mg, capmatinib tablets, administered orally twice daily
Active comparator: Docetaxel - Docetaxel 75 mg/m\^2 solution administered by intravenous infusion on Day 1 of every 21-day cycle
Treatment: Drugs: Capmatinib
400 mg, capmatinib tablets, administered orally twice daily
Treatment: Drugs: Docetaxel
Docetaxel 75 mg/m\^2 by intravenous infusion every 21 days
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Progression-free Survival (PFS) Per Blinded Independent Review Committee (BIRC) Using RECIST v1.1
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Progression-free survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented progressive disease (PD) as assessed by BIRC according to RECIST 1.1, or death due to any cause. PD=At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm\^2. PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment, if no PFS event was observed prior to the analysis cut-off date.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
From randomization to the date of first documented progression or death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to approximately 21 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Overall Response (ORR) Per RECIST 1.1 by BIRC
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Percentage of participants with confirmed best overall response (BOR) of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), assessed by BIRC according to RECIST 1.1. CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Up to approximately 21 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST 1.1 by Investigator
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Percentage of participants with confirmed BOR of CR or PR, assessed by local review according to RECIST 1.1. CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Up to approximately 21 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Time to Response (TTR) Per RECIST 1.1 by BIRC
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Time from date of randomization to first documented response of either CR or PR, which must be subsequently confirmed, assessed by BIRC according to RECIST 1.1. CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
From date of randomization to first documented response of either CR or PR, assessed up to approximately 21 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Time to Response (TTR) Per RECIST 1.1 by Investigator
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Time from date of randomization to first documented response of either CR or PR, which must be subsequently confirmed, assessed by local review according to RECIST 1.1. CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
From date of randomization to first documented response of either CR or PR, assessed up to approximately 21 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Duration of Response (DOR) Per RECIST 1.1 by BIRC
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Duration of response was defined as the time from the date of first documented response (CR or PR) to the first documented progression by BIRC per RECIST 1.1 or death due to any cause. CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
From first documented response to first documented progression or death due to any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to approximately 21 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Duration of Response (DOR) Per RECIST 1.1 by Investigator
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Duration of response was defined as the time from the date of first documented response (CR or PR) to the first documented progression by local review per RECIST 1.1 or death due to any cause. CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
From first documented response to first documented progression or death due to any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to approximately 21 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per RECIST 1.1 by BIRC
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
Disease control rate was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response (BOR) of confirmed CR, PR and stable disease (SD) assessed by BIRC according to RECIST 1.1. CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters; SD=Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for progressive disease.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Up to approximately 21 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per RECIST 1.1 by Investigator
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
Disease control rate was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response (BOR) of confirmed CR, PR and stable disease (SD) assessed by local review according to RECIST 1.1. CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters; SD=Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for progressive disease.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Up to approximately 21 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Progression-free Survival (PFS) Per Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
Progression-free survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented progressive disease (PD) as assessed by local review according to RECIST 1.1, or death due to any cause. PD=At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm\^2.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
From randomization to the date of first documented progression or death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to approximately 21 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Overall Survival (OS)
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
From randomization to death due to any cause, assessed up to approximately 36 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Overall Intracranial Response Rate (OIRR)
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
Percentage of participants with confirmed best overall intracranial response (BOIR) of CR or partial response (PR), as assessed by BIRC review per Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) criteria. Criteria for CR: Disappearance of all central nervous system (CNS) target and non-target lesions sustained for at least 4 weeks, with no new lesions, and no use of corticosteroids. PR: =30% decrease in the sublaterodorsal tegmental nucleus (SLD) of CNS target lesions or no new lesions or and stable to decreased corticosteroid dose.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
Up to approximately 21 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Duration of Intracranial Response (DOIR)
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
Time from date of first documented intracranial response (CR or PR) to first documented intracranial progression per RANO-BM assessed by BIRC or date of death due to underlying cause of cancer.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
From date of first documented intracranial response (CR or PR) to first documented intracranial progression, assessed up to approximately 21 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Time to Intracranial Response (TTIR)
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
Time from date of randomization to first documented intracranial response of either CR or PR, per RANO-BM criteria and assessed by BIRC, which must be subsequently confirmed.
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
From date of randomization to first documented intracranial response of either CR or PR, assessed up to approximately 21 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
Intracranial Disease Control Rate (IDCR)
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
Percentage of participants with a BOR of confirmed CR, PR and stable disease (SD) (or non-CR/non-PD) per RANO-BM, assessed by BIRC. Criteria for CR: Disappearance of all central nervous system (CNS) target and non-target lesions sustained for at least 4 weeks, with no new lesions, and no use of corticosteroids. PR: =30% decrease in the sublaterodorsal tegmental nucleus (SLD) of CNS target lesions or no new lesions or and stable to decreased corticosteroid dose.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
Up to approximately 21 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
Plasma Capmatinib Concentration
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
Plasma concentrations of capmatinib. Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis.
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
Cycle (C) 1 Day (D) 15 pre-dose, 1 and 4 hours post-dose, C3 D1 pre-dose. Each cycle duration was 21 days.
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Score as Per European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of cancer patients. The questionnaire is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures based on the participants experience over the past week. These include five domains (physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social functioning), three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), six single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial impact) and a global health status/HRQoL scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. CFB = change from baseline.
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
Baseline, Cycle (C) 3, Day (D) 1 and then every 6 weeks up to approximately 21 months, end of treatment. Each cycle duration was 21 days.
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Score as Per European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)
Query!
Assessment method [17]
0
0
EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a 13-item lung cancer specific questionnaire. The assessments here included coughing, hemoptysis, dyspnea, sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, pain in chest, pain in arm or shoulder, and pain in other parts and were based on their presence over the previous week. All but the pain domain were scored on a 4 point Likert scale ranging from "not at all" to "very much." Pain was scored based on its presence, yes or no. Scores were averaged and transformed to 0 to 100. A higher score indicated a higher presence of symptoms. CFB = change from baseline.
Query!
Timepoint [17]
0
0
Baseline, Cycle (C) 3, Day (D) 1 and then every 6 weeks up to approximately 21 months, end of treatment. Each cycle duration was 21 days.
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Score as Per European Quality of Life 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) Questionnaire
Query!
Assessment method [18]
0
0
EQ-5D-5L is a standardized measure to assess the overall health-related quality of life in patients. The EQ-5D-5L consists of 2 parts- the descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression), each with 5 levels: from 1 (no problems) to 5 (extreme problems). The EQ VAS is a self-perceived health score assessed using a visual analogue scale that ranges from 0 (the worst imaginable health) to 100 (the best imaginable health), with higher scores indicating higher health utility. CFB = change from baseline.
Query!
Timepoint [18]
0
0
Baseline, Cycle (C) 3, Day (D) 1 and then every 6 weeks up to approximately 21 months, end of treatment. Each cycle duration was 21 days.
Query!
Secondary outcome [19]
0
0
Time to Symptom Deterioration for Chest Pain, Cough and Dyspnea Assessed Using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)
Query!
Assessment method [19]
0
0
EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a 13-item lung cancer specific questionnaire. The assessments here included chest pain, cough, and dyspnea and were based on their presence over the previous week. All but the pain domain were scored on a 4 point Likert scale ranging from "not at all" to "very much." Pain was scored based on its presence, yes or no. Scores were averaged and transformed to 0 to 100. A higher score indicated a higher presence of symptoms. Time to symptom deterioration for chest pain, cough and dyspnea was assessed. Deterioration was assessed by the investigator.
Query!
Timepoint [19]
0
0
Cycle (C) 1 Day (D) 1, C3 D1 and then every 6 weeks up to approximately 21 months, end of treatment and 6, 12, 18 weeks post treatment. Each cycle duration was 21 days.
Query!
Secondary outcome [20]
0
0
Time to Deterioration for Global Health Status /QoL Assessed Using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30
Query!
Assessment method [20]
0
0
EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of cancer patients. The questionnaire is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures based on the participants experience over the past week. These include five domains (physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social functioning), three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), six single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial impact) and a global health status/HRQoL scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. Time to deterioration in QoL from EORTC-QLQ-C30 was assessed. Deterioration was assessed by the investigator.
Query!
Timepoint [20]
0
0
Cycle (C) 1 Day (D) 1, C3 D1 and then every 6 weeks up to approximately 21 months, end of treatment and 6, 12, 18 weeks post treatment. Each cycle duration was 21 days.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Key
* Stage IIIB/IIIC (not amenable to surgery, radiation or multi modality therapy) or IV NSCLC (according to Version 8 of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging Manual) at the time of study entry.
* Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of NSCLC that was:
1. EGFR wt. Assessed as part of participant's standard of care by a validated test for EGFR mutations as per local guidelines. The EGFR wt status (for EGFR mutations that predict sensitivity to EGFR therapy, including, but not limited to exon 19 deletions and exon 21 L858R substitution mutations.
2. AND ALK rearrangement negative. Assessed as part of participant's standard of care by a validated test.
3. AND had MET?ex14 mutation as determined by Novartis-designated central laboratory or by locally performed, tissue-based test, validated according to local regulation, from a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)-certified US laboratory or an accredited local laboratory outside of the US. The positive MET?ex14 mutation result as determined per local test must have been documented in the participant's source documents and in the CRF prior to entering main screening.
* Mandatory provision of a formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded tumor tissue sample (archival tumor block or slides, or a newly obtained tumor sample) with quality and quantity sufficient to allow assessment of MET?ex14 mutation status (as defined in the study [laboratory manual]). This pertained to all participants, including those who had a MET?ex14 mutation result from a local test. Tumor samples must have contained at least 10% tumor content.
6. Participants must have progressed on one or two prior lines of systemic therapy for advanced/metastatic disease (stage IIIB/IIIC [not candidates for surgery, radiation or multi modality therapy] or IV NSCLC) and must have been docetaxel naïve and candidates for single agent chemotherapy (docetaxel). Treatment failure was defined as documented disease progression or intolerance to treatment, however, participants must have progressed on or after the last therapy before study entry.
* At least one measurable lesion as defined by RECIST 1.1
* Adequate organ function
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0 or 1.
* Life expectancy of at least 3 months.
Key
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
100
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Prior treatment with any MET inhibitor or HGF-targeting therapy.
* Participants with symptomatic central nervous system (CNS) metastases who were neurologically unstable or had required increasing doses of steroids within the 2 weeks prior to study entry to manage CNS symptoms.
* Participants with known druggable molecular alterations (such as ROS1 and RET rearrangement, BRAF mutation, KRAS mutation, NTRK fusion, etc.) which might have been a candidate for alternative targeted therapies.
* Presence or history of interstitial lung disease or interstitial pneumonitis, including clinically significant radiation pneumonitis (i.e., affecting activities of daily living or requiring therapeutic intervention).
* Substance abuse, active infection or other severe, acute, or chronic medical or psychotic conditions or laboratory abnormalities that in the opinion of the investigator may have increased the risk associated with study participation.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Crossover
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Stopped early
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
25/09/2020
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
6/11/2023
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
22
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Leuven
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
SP
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
Bulgaria
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Pleven
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
Bulgaria
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Sofia
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Caen
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Paris
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Pierre Benite
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Bavaria
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Bayern
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Berlin
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Koeln
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Oldenburg
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Pest
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Budapest
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
India
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Delhi
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
India
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Maharashtra
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
India
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Tamil Nadu
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
MI
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
RM
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Seoul
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
Lithuania
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Vilnius
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
Malaysia
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Pahang
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Malaysia
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Wilayah Persekutuan
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Malaysia
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Pulau Pinang
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Nijmegen
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Portugal
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Lisboa
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Portugal
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Matosinhos
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Nizhniy Novgorod
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Omsk
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Pushkin Saint Petersburg
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
St- Petersburg
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
South Africa
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Western Cape
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Andalucia
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Asturias
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Madrid
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Valencia
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Thailand
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Hat Yai
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Thailand
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Bangkok
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Vietnam
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Hanoi
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The purpose of the study was to learn whether the study drug (capmatinib) helps to control lung cancer better compared to a single agent chemotherapy (docetaxel) and whether it is safe when given to patients suffering from a particular type of lung cancer. This type of cancer is called non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with certain specific genetic alterations (called mutations) of a gene called MET, within a specific part of the gene called exon 14.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04427072
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
This record is viewable in the ANZCTR as it had previously listed Australia and/or New Zealand as a recruitment site, however these sites have since been removed
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Query!
Address
0
0
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Data sharing statement
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Type
Other Details
Attachment
Study protocol
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/72/NCT04427072/Prot_000.pdf
Statistical analysis plan
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/72/NCT04427072/SAP_001.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04427072
Download to PDF