Trial Review

Did you know?

The ANZCTR now automatically displays published trial results and simplifies the addition of trial documents such as unpublished protocols and statistical analysis plans.

These enhancements will offer a more comprehensive view of trials, regardless of whether their results are positive, negative, or inconclusive.

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov

For full trial details, please see the original record at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00002744




Registration number
NCT00002744
Ethics application status
Date submitted
1/11/1999
Date registered
1/09/2004
Date last updated
9/02/2017

Titles & IDs
Public title
Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Children With Newly Diagnosed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Scientific title
Randomized Comparisons of Oral Mercaptopurine vs Oral Thioguanine and IT Methotrexate vs ITT for Standard Risk Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Secondary ID [1] 0 0
CCG-1952
Secondary ID [2] 0 0
1952
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Trial acronym
Linked study record

Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Leukemia 0 0
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer 0 0 0 0
Leukaemia - Acute leukaemia
Cancer 0 0 0 0
Leukaemia - Chronic leukaemia
Cancer 0 0 0 0
Children's - Leukaemia & Lymphoma
Cancer 0 0 0 0
Lymphoma (non Hodgkin's lymphoma) - High grade lymphoma
Cancer 0 0 0 0
Lymphoma (non Hodgkin's lymphoma) - Low grade lymphoma

Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Experimental: Arm I - Therapy defined in description.

Experimental: Arm 2 - Therapy defined in description.

Experimental: Arm 3 - Therapy defined in description.

Experimental: Arm 4 - Therapy defined in description.
Comparator / control treatment
Control group

Outcomes
Primary outcome [1] 0 0
Event Free Survival
Timepoint [1] 0 0
Secondary outcome [1] 0 0
Comparisons of CNS relapse incidence rates
Timepoint [1] 0 0

Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) obtained by bone marrow aspirate or bone marrow biopsy No greater than 25% L3 blasts Initial white blood cell count less than 50,000/mm3 (performed at CCG institution) Massive lymphadenopathy, massive splenomegaly, and/or large mediastinal mass allowed CNS or testicular leukemia allowed Allogeneic bone marrow transplant should be considered (if donor available) for patients with Philadelphia chromosome (t[9;22][q34;q11]) or translocation (4;11)(q21;q23)

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: 1 through 9 Performance status: Not specified Hematopoietic: See Disease Characteristics Hepatic: Not specified Renal: Not specified

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: No prior treatment for ALL Biologic therapy: Not specified Chemotherapy: Intrathecal cytarabine (IT ARA-C) may begin prior to registration provided systemic chemotherapy initiated within 72 hours after IT ARA-C Endocrine therapy: See Radiotherapy At least 1 month since prior systemic steroids Steroids given for less than 48 hours allowed Inhaled corticosteroids allowed at any time Radiotherapy: Radiotherapy or dexamethasone for mediastinal mass causing superior mediastinal syndrome allowed prior to registration, if indicated Surgery: Not specified
Minimum age
1 Year
Maximum age
9 Years
Sex
Both males and females
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Key exclusion criteria

Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Who is / are masked / blinded?



Intervention assignment
Single group
Other design features
Phase
Phase 3
Type of endpoint/s
Statistical methods / analysis

Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Data analysis
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Other reasons
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
1/05/1996
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Actual
1/03/2007
Sample size
Target
Accrual to date
Final
1970
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
WA
Recruitment hospital [1] 0 0
Princess Margaret Hospital for Children - Perth
Recruitment postcode(s) [1] 0 0
6001 - Perth
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [1] 0 0
California
Country [2] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [2] 0 0
Colorado
Country [3] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [3] 0 0
District of Columbia
Country [4] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [4] 0 0
Illinois
Country [5] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [5] 0 0
Indiana
Country [6] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [6] 0 0
Iowa
Country [7] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [7] 0 0
Michigan
Country [8] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [8] 0 0
Minnesota
Country [9] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [9] 0 0
Missouri
Country [10] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [10] 0 0
Nebraska
Country [11] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [11] 0 0
New York
Country [12] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [12] 0 0
North Carolina
Country [13] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [13] 0 0
Ohio
Country [14] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [14] 0 0
Oregon
Country [15] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [15] 0 0
Pennsylvania
Country [16] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [16] 0 0
Tennessee
Country [17] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [17] 0 0
Texas
Country [18] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [18] 0 0
Utah
Country [19] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [19] 0 0
Washington
Country [20] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [20] 0 0
Wisconsin
Country [21] 0 0
Canada
State/province [21] 0 0
British Columbia
Country [22] 0 0
Canada
State/province [22] 0 0
Nova Scotia

Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Other
Name
Children's Oncology Group
Address
Country
Other collaborator category [1] 0 0
Government body
Name [1] 0 0
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Address [1] 0 0
Country [1] 0 0

Ethics approval
Ethics application status

Summary
Brief summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug and giving them in different ways may kill more cancer cells. It is not yet known which regimen of combination chemotherapy is more effective for acute lymphoblastic leukemia

PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare different regimens of combination chemotherapy in treating children who have newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00002744
Trial related presentations / publications
Nguyen K, Devidas M, Cheng SC, La M, Raetz EA, Carroll WL, Winick NJ, Hunger SP, Gaynon PS, Loh ML; Children's Oncology Group. Factors influencing survival after relapse from acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Children's Oncology Group study. Leukemia. 2008 Dec;22(12):2142-50. doi: 10.1038/leu.2008.251. Epub 2008 Sep 25.
Matloub Y, Asselin BL, Stork LC, et al.: Outcome of children with T-Cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) and standard risk (SR) features: results of CCG-1952, CCG-1991 and POG 9404. [Abstract] Blood 104 (11): A-680, 195a, 2004.
Stork LC, Matloub Y, Broxson E, La M, Yanofsky R, Sather H, Hutchinson R, Heerema NA, Sorrell AD, Masterson M, Bleyer A, Gaynon PS. Oral 6-mercaptopurine versus oral 6-thioguanine and veno-occlusive disease in children with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: report of the Children's Oncology Group CCG-1952 clinical trial. Blood. 2010 Apr 8;115(14):2740-8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-07-230656. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
Kadan-Lottick NS, Brouwers P, Breiger D, Kaleita T, Dziura J, Northrup V, Chen L, Nicoletti M, Bostrom B, Stork L, Neglia JP. Comparison of neurocognitive functioning in children previously randomly assigned to intrathecal methotrexate compared with triple intrathecal therapy for the treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Dec 10;27(35):5986-92. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.5408. Epub 2009 Nov 2.
Malempati S, Gaynon PS, Sather H, La MK, Stork LC; Children's Oncology Group. Outcome after relapse among children with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Children's Oncology Group study CCG-1952. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Dec 20;25(36):5800-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.10.7508.
Matloub Y, Lindemulder S, Gaynon PS, Sather H, La M, Broxson E, Yanofsky R, Hutchinson R, Heerema NA, Nachman J, Blake M, Wells LM, Sorrell AD, Masterson M, Kelleher JF, Stork LC; Children's Oncology Group. Intrathecal triple therapy decreases central nervous system relapse but fails to improve event-free survival when compared with intrathecal methotrexate: results of the Children's Cancer Group (CCG) 1952 study for standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia, reported by the Children's Oncology Group. Blood. 2006 Aug 15;108(4):1165-73. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-12-011809. Epub 2006 Apr 11.
Bassal M, La MK, Whitlock JA, Sather HN, Heerema NA, Gaynon PS, Stork LC. Lymphoblast biology and outcome among children with Down syndrome and ALL treated on CCG-1952. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2005 Jan;44(1):21-8. doi: 10.1002/pbc.20193.
Malempati S, Gaynon PS, Sather H, et al.: Outcome after relapse among children with standard risk (SR) ALL treated on CCG-1952. [Abstract] Blood 104 (11): A-520, 2004.
Stork LC, Sather H, Hutchinson RJ, et al.: Comparison of mercaptopurine (MP) with thioguanine (TG) and IT methotrexate (ITM) with IT "triples" (ITT) in children with SR-ALL: results of CCG-1952. [Abstract] Blood 100 (11 Pt 1): A-585, 156a, 2002.
Stork LC, Sather H, Yanofsky R, et al.: Hyperdiploidy with trisomy 10 and TEL-AML1 expression among children with standard risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (SR-ALL): a CCG-1952 report. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 20: A-1476, 2001.
Gaynon PS, Stork L, Sather H, et al.: Leukemic progenitor cell content of pre- and post-induction chemotherapy bone marrow specimens from children with newly diagnosed or relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 18: A-2187, 567a, 1999.
Stork LC, Erdmann G, Adamson P, et al.: Oral 6-thioguanine causes relatively mild and reversible hepatic veno-occlusive disease(VOD). J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 20: 400a, 1998.
Public notes

Contacts
Principal investigator
Name 0 0
Linda C. Stork, MD
Address 0 0
Doernbecher Children's Hospital at Oregon Health and Science University
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Fax 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for public queries
Name 0 0
Address 0 0
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Fax 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for scientific queries



Summary Results

For IPD and results data, please see https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00002744