Did you know?

The ANZCTR now automatically displays published trial results and simplifies the addition of trial documents such as unpublished protocols and statistical analysis plans.

These enhancements will offer a more comprehensive view of trials, regardless of whether their results are positive, negative, or inconclusive.

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov

For full trial details, please see the original record at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00387686




Registration number
NCT00387686
Ethics application status
Date submitted
11/10/2006
Date registered
13/10/2006
Date last updated
28/02/2013

Titles & IDs
Public title
A Phase 2/3 Multicenter, Controlled Trial Of rhBMP-2/CPM In Tibial Fractures
Scientific title
A Phase 2/3, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Study Of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 (rhBMP-2)/Calcium Phosphate Matrix (CPM) In Closed Diaphyseal Tibial Fracture
Secondary ID [1] 0 0
3100N7-210
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Trial acronym
Linked study record

Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Fractures 0 0
Condition category
Condition code
Injuries and Accidents 0 0 0 0
Fractures
Musculoskeletal 0 0 0 0
Other muscular and skeletal disorders

Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Experimental: A - 1.0 mg/mL rhBMP-2/CPM + surgical fixation

Experimental: B - 2.0 mg/mL rhBMP-2/CPM + surgical fixation

Active comparator: C - Buffer/CPM + surgical fixation Intervention

Other: D - Standard of Care: Surgical fixation intervention

Comparator / control treatment
Control group

Outcomes
Primary outcome [1] 0 0
The primary objective of this study is to assess whether a single dose of rhBMP-2/CPM administered in combination with the SOC accelerates fracture union and return to normal function as indicated on radiographs and functional evaluations.
Timepoint [1] 0 0
efficacy will be demonstrated if there is a greater than or equal to 4 week reduction in time to fra
Secondary outcome [1] 0 0
Demonstrate safety of rhBMP-2/CPM administration; demonstrate earlier return to function; assess feasibility of rhBMP-2CPM administration. Subject enrollment 12 months
Timepoint [1] 0 0
12 months

Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Skeletally mature, male and female subjects who are at least 18 years old.
* Closed diaphyseal tibial fracture.
* Closed reduction and definitive internal fixation by means of a reamed, locked intramedullary nail within 72 hours after injury.
Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
No limit
Sex
Both males and females
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Key exclusion criteria
* Concurrent fractures of the ipsilateral or contralateral lower extremity other than the ipsilateral fibula, that would impede performance on the functional assessment of weight bearing.
* Planned procedure(s) to stimulate fracture healing after intramedullary nailing.
* Neurovascular impairment of the fractured limb, deep vein thrombosis, or (impending) compartment syndrome.

Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people administering the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Other design features
Phase
Phase 2
Type of endpoint/s
Statistical methods / analysis

Recruitment
Recruitment status
Stopped early
Data analysis
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Other reasons
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Actual
Sample size
Target
Accrual to date
Final
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,QLD,SA
Recruitment hospital [1] 0 0
Pfizer Investigational Site - Liverpool
Recruitment hospital [2] 0 0
Pfizer Investigational Site - New Lambton
Recruitment hospital [3] 0 0
Pfizer Investigational Site - Herston
Recruitment hospital [4] 0 0
Pfizer Investigational Site - Adelaide
Recruitment postcode(s) [1] 0 0
2170 - Liverpool
Recruitment postcode(s) [2] 0 0
2305 - New Lambton
Recruitment postcode(s) [3] 0 0
4029 - Herston
Recruitment postcode(s) [4] 0 0
5000 - Adelaide
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [1] 0 0
Alabama
Country [2] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [2] 0 0
Colorado
Country [3] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [3] 0 0
Connecticut
Country [4] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [4] 0 0
Florida
Country [5] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [5] 0 0
Indiana
Country [6] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [6] 0 0
Maryland
Country [7] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [7] 0 0
Michigan
Country [8] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [8] 0 0
New Hampshire
Country [9] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [9] 0 0
New Jersey
Country [10] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [10] 0 0
New York
Country [11] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [11] 0 0
North Carolina
Country [12] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [12] 0 0
Tennessee
Country [13] 0 0
Argentina
State/province [13] 0 0
Buenos Aires
Country [14] 0 0
Brazil
State/province [14] 0 0
Sao Paolo
Country [15] 0 0
Brazil
State/province [15] 0 0
Sao Paulo
Country [16] 0 0
Canada
State/province [16] 0 0
Ontario
Country [17] 0 0
Canada
State/province [17] 0 0
Quebec
Country [18] 0 0
Finland
State/province [18] 0 0
Oulu
Country [19] 0 0
Finland
State/province [19] 0 0
Turku
Country [20] 0 0
France
State/province [20] 0 0
Angers
Country [21] 0 0
France
State/province [21] 0 0
Créteil
Country [22] 0 0
France
State/province [22] 0 0
Marseille
Country [23] 0 0
France
State/province [23] 0 0
Toulouse
Country [24] 0 0
Germany
State/province [24] 0 0
Berlin
Country [25] 0 0
Germany
State/province [25] 0 0
Mainz
Country [26] 0 0
Germany
State/province [26] 0 0
Muenster
Country [27] 0 0
India
State/province [27] 0 0
Andhra Pradesh
Country [28] 0 0
India
State/province [28] 0 0
Gujarat
Country [29] 0 0
India
State/province [29] 0 0
Karnataka
Country [30] 0 0
India
State/province [30] 0 0
Maharashtra
Country [31] 0 0
Latvia
State/province [31] 0 0
Riga
Country [32] 0 0
Mexico
State/province [32] 0 0
Del Miguel, Hidalgo
Country [33] 0 0
Mexico
State/province [33] 0 0
Guadalajara, Jal.
Country [34] 0 0
Mexico
State/province [34] 0 0
Mexico D.F.
Country [35] 0 0
Mexico
State/province [35] 0 0
Chihuahua
Country [36] 0 0
Mexico
State/province [36] 0 0
Guadalajara, Jal
Country [37] 0 0
Poland
State/province [37] 0 0
Bielsk Podlaski
Country [38] 0 0
Poland
State/province [38] 0 0
Krakow
Country [39] 0 0
Romania
State/province [39] 0 0
Cluj
Country [40] 0 0
Romania
State/province [40] 0 0
Bucharest
Country [41] 0 0
Romania
State/province [41] 0 0
Bucuresti
Country [42] 0 0
Romania
State/province [42] 0 0
Iasi
Country [43] 0 0
Serbia
State/province [43] 0 0
Belgrade
Country [44] 0 0
Serbia
State/province [44] 0 0
Nis
Country [45] 0 0
Slovenia
State/province [45] 0 0
Ljubljana
Country [46] 0 0
Spain
State/province [46] 0 0
Madrid
Country [47] 0 0
Spain
State/province [47] 0 0
Alcala
Country [48] 0 0
Sweden
State/province [48] 0 0
Uppsala
Country [49] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [49] 0 0
Coventry
Country [50] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [50] 0 0
Norwich

Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Name
Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer
Address
Country

Ethics approval
Ethics application status

Summary
Brief summary
The primary objective of this study is to assess whether a single dose of rhBMP-2/CPM administered at the fracture site via percutaneous injection, in combination with standard of care, accelerates fracture union and return to normal function in subjects who have a closed diaphyseal tibial fracture when compared to standard of care alone.
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00387686
Trial related presentations / publications
Public notes

Contacts
Principal investigator
Name 0 0
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Address 0 0
Pfizer
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Fax 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for public queries
Name 0 0
Address 0 0
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Fax 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for scientific queries



Summary Results

For IPD and results data, please see https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00387686