Trial Review

Registering a new trial?

To achieve prospective registration, we recommend submitting your trial for registration at the same time as ethics submission.

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this information for consumers
Trial registered on ANZCTR


Registration number
ACTRN12605000135617
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
5/08/2005
Date registered
12/08/2005
Date last updated
12/08/2005
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered

Titles & IDs
Public title
Anaesthesia with sevoflurane/fentanyl versus anaesthesia with desflurane/fentanyl: Differences in Bronchial Mucous Transport Velocity
Scientific title
Bronchoscopic evaluation of bronchial mucus transport velocity: anaesthesia with deflurane/fentanyl versus anaesthesia with sevoflurane/fentanyl.
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Trial acronym
Linked study record

Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Bronchial mucus transport velocity 223 0
Condition category
Condition code
Anaesthesiology 252 252 0 0
Other anaesthesiology
Respiratory 253 253 0 0
Normal development and function of the respiratory system

Intervention/exposure
Study type
Observational
Patient registry
Target follow-up duration
Target follow-up type
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Tracheobronchoscopy
Intervention code [1] 124 0
Other interventions
Comparator / control treatment
Control group

Outcomes
Primary outcome [1] 301 0
The bronchial mucus transport velocity
Timepoint [1] 301 0
Bronchoscopically assessed 30 minutes after placing the endotracheal tube.
Secondary outcome [1] 661 0
nil
Timepoint [1] 661 0

Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Elective relaxant anaesthesia.
Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
Not stated
Sex
Both males and females
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Key exclusion criteria
Smoking; history of lung disease; atopy; steroids; betablockers; atropine.

Study design
Purpose
Natural history
Duration
Longitudinal
Selection
Defined population
Timing
Prospective
Statistical methods / analysis

Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/08/2005
Actual
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Actual
Sample size
Target
20
Accrual to date
Final
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)

Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1] 310 0
Hospital
Name [1] 310 0
Royal Perth Hospital
Country [1] 310 0
Australia
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Name
Royal Perth Hospital
Address
Country
Australia
Secondary sponsor category [1] 241 0
None
Name [1] 241 0
n/a
Address [1] 241 0
Country [1] 241 0

Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Ethics committee name [1] 1181 0
Royal Perth Hospital
Ethics committee address [1] 1181 0
Ethics committee country [1] 1181 0
Australia
Date submitted for ethics approval [1] 1181 0
Approval date [1] 1181 0
Ethics approval number [1] 1181 0

Summary
Brief summary
Comparison of bronchial mucus transport velocity in patients having either sevoflurane or desflurane based anaesthesia.
Trial website
Trial related presentations / publications
Public notes

Contacts
Principal investigator
Name 35910 0
Address 35910 0
Country 35910 0
Phone 35910 0
Fax 35910 0
Email 35910 0
Contact person for public queries
Name 9313 0
Thomas Ledowski
Address 9313 0
Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine
Royal Perth Hospital
Wellington Street
Perth WA 6000
Country 9313 0
Australia
Phone 9313 0
+61 8 92242797
Fax 9313 0
+61 8 92241111
Email 9313 0
[email protected]
Contact person for scientific queries
Name 241 0
Thomas Ledowski
Address 241 0
Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine
Royal Perth Hospital
Wellington Street
Perth WA 6000
Country 241 0
Australia
Phone 241 0
+61 8 92242797
Fax 241 0
+61 8 92241111
Email 241 0
[email protected]

No information has been provided regarding IPD availability


What supporting documents are/will be available?

No Supporting Document Provided



Results publications and other study-related documents

Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.

Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.