Trial Review

ANZCTR is currently experiencing a technical issue. Thank you for your patience while we work on it and apologies for any inconvenience caused.


Reset your password and enable multi-factor authentication (MFA)


For ANZCTR account holders: to help ensure the cyber safety of your account, you’ll need to reset your password and set-up multi-factor authentication (MFA) as per the instructions below.


  1. Go to the Login page, click ‘reset password’ and follow the instructions.
  2. Check your email for the link to set a new password.
  3. Create a new password that meets requirements.
  4. Return to the Login page and enter your new password. A verification code will be sent to your email.
  5. Check your email for the code and enter it on the Login page. If the code is entered incorrectly, you can re-enter the correct one or request a new one.

Learn more about MFA and its importance on the Australian Signals Directorate website.

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov

For full trial details, please see the original record at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00299494




Registration number
NCT00299494
Ethics application status
Date submitted
2/03/2006
Date registered
6/03/2006
Date last updated
8/03/2018

Titles & IDs
Public title
Study Evaluating Inotuzumab Ozogamicin [CMC-544] Administered In Combination With Rituximab In Subjects With Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL)
Scientific title
A Phase 1/2 Study Of Cmc-544 Administered In Combination With Rituximab In Subjects With Follicular Or Diffuse Large B-cell Non-hodgkin's Lymphoma
Secondary ID [1] 0 0
B1931004
Secondary ID [2] 0 0
3129K3-101
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Trial acronym
Linked study record

Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
B-Cell Lymphoma 0 0
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer 0 0 0 0
Lymphoma (non Hodgkin's lymphoma) - High grade lymphoma
Cancer 0 0 0 0
Lymphoma (non Hodgkin's lymphoma) - Low grade lymphoma

Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - inotuzumab ozogamicin
Treatment: Drugs - inotuzumab ozogamicin
Treatment: Drugs - inotuzumab ozogamicin
Treatment: Drugs - Rituximab

Experimental: INOTUZUMAB OZOGAMICIN MTD + RITUXIMAB (FOLLICULAR) - Follicular

Experimental: INOTUZUMAB OZOGAMICIN MTD + RITUXIMAB (DLBCL) - Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma

Experimental: INOTUZUMAB OZOGAMICIN MTD + RITUXIMAB (REFRACTORY) - Refractory Aggressive NHL


Treatment: Drugs: inotuzumab ozogamicin
IV, 1.8 mg/m2, q4w

Treatment: Drugs: inotuzumab ozogamicin
IV, 1.8 mg/m2, q4w

Treatment: Drugs: inotuzumab ozogamicin
IV, 1.8 mg/m2, q4w

Treatment: Drugs: Rituximab
rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 via IV infusion on Day 1
Intervention code [1] 0 0
Treatment: Drugs
Comparator / control treatment
Control group

Outcomes
Primary outcome [1] 0 0
Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Combination With Rituximab (375 mg/m^2 )
Assessment method [1] 0 0
Inotuzumab ozogamicin was dose escalated (3 to 6 evaluable participants enrolled per dose cohort) during the first 28 days after the first administration of inotuzumab ozogamicin + rituximab. Enrollment at the next dose level or enrollment of additional subjects into a cohort proceeded according to the following criteria: 0 dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) by Day 28 of first dose move to higher dose, 1 participant reporting DLT but no others in cohort by Day 28 of first dose move to higher dose, greater than 2 participants reporting DLT by Day 28 of first dose stop and prior dose level considered MTD. The worldwide medical monitor and investigators reviewed all significant study drug-related toxicities to determine if the dose escalation rules were satisfied and whether the dose escalation schedule required modification.
Timepoint [1] 0 0
First 28-day cycle
Primary outcome [2] 0 0
Percentage of Participants With a Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) (Safety Population)
Assessment method [2] 0 0
A TEAE is any event that occurred after the first dose of study drug up to 56 days post the last dose of study drug (either rituximab or inotuzumab ozogamicin).
Timepoint [2] 0 0
Protocol reporting period of from informed consent to at least 28 days after the last dose. This outcome measure time frame: From the first dose of study drug to up to 56 days after the last dose of either study drug.
Secondary outcome [1] 0 0
Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR), Unconfirmed CR (CRu), or Partial Response (PR)
Assessment method [1] 0 0
CR: a. Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical and radiographic evidence of disease, disease-related symptoms, and normalization of NHL assignable biochemical abnormalities ; b. lymph nodes and nodal masses must have regressed to normal size; c. Spleen regressed in size and not palpable on physical exam, size of other organs enlarged due to disease decreased in size; d. Repeat bone marrow infiltrate clear. CRu: CR but allows for a. Residual lymph node mass \>1.5 cm in greatest transverse diameter has regressed by more than 75% in diameter. Individual nodes that were previously confluent regressed more than 75 % in their product diameters; b. Indeterminate bone marrow. PR: a. =50 % decrease in product of the diameters (SPD) of the 6 largest dominant nodes or nodal masses; b. No increase in size of other nodes, liver, or spleen, c. Liver or spleen nodules regressed =50% in the SPD; d. Other organs usually assessable, no measurable disease present.
Timepoint [1] 0 0
Approximately every 2 (during treatment) or 3 (during follow-up) to 6 months for up to 5 years from 1st dose
Secondary outcome [2] 0 0
Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Assessment method [2] 0 0
The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine PFS. 95% 2-sided confidence interval were calculated using stratified Cox proportional hazard regression. Relapsed or Progressive Disease (PD) requires the following: a. Appearance of any new lesions, b. Increase by \>= 50% in the size of previously involved sites, c. \>= 50% increase in greatest diameter of any previously identified node greater than 1 cm in its short axis or in the SPD of more than one node, d. \>= 50% increase from nadir in the product diameter of any previously identified abnormal node for PRs or nonresponders, e. Enlarging spleen or liver.
Timepoint [2] 0 0
From the date of first dose of test article until the first date on which disease progression or death was documented or new anticancer start, any of which could be reported up to 5 years post last dose
Secondary outcome [3] 0 0
Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Progression Free at 6 Months
Assessment method [3] 0 0
Progression Free Survival is defined as the time interval from the first dose of test article until the first date on which relapsed disease, progression, initiation of new anti-cancer treatment due to persistent/refractory disease, or death was documented, censored at the last tumor evaluation.
Timepoint [3] 0 0
From the first dose to 6 months after first dose
Secondary outcome [4] 0 0
Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Overall Survival (OS)
Assessment method [4] 0 0
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause, censoring at the date of last contact. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine OS. 95% 2-sided confidence interval were calculated using stratified Cox proportional hazard regression.
Timepoint [4] 0 0
From the first dose up to 5 years post last dose
Secondary outcome [5] 0 0
Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Survival at 6 Months
Assessment method [5] 0 0
Overall Survival (OS) was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause, censoring at the date of last contact. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine OS. 95% 2-sided confidence interval were calculated using stratified Cox proportional hazard regression.
Timepoint [5] 0 0
From the first dose to 6 months after first dose.
Secondary outcome [6] 0 0
Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Time to Tumor Progression (TTP)
Assessment method [6] 0 0
TTP is defined as the interval from the first dose of the test article until the first date on which relapsed disease or progression, or death secondary to progression is documented, censored at the last disease assessment. Relapsed or Progressive Disease (PD) requires the following: a. Appearance of any new lesions, b. Increase by \>= 50% in the size of previously involved sites, c. \>= 50% increase in greatest diameter of any previously identified node greater than 1 cm in its short axis or in the SPD of more than one node, d. \>= 50% increase from nadir in the product diameter of any previously identified abnormal node for PRs or nonresponders, e. Enlarging spleen or liver. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine TTP. 95% 2-sided confidence interval were calculated using stratified Cox proportional hazard regression.
Timepoint [6] 0 0
From the date of first dose of test article until the first date on which disease progression or death was documented, any of which could be reported up to 5 years post last dose.
Secondary outcome [7] 0 0
Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Event Free at 6 Months
Assessment method [7] 0 0
Time-to-Tumor Progression (TTP): is defined as the interval from the first dose of the test article until the first date on which relapsed disease or progression, or death secondary to progression is documented, censored at the last disease assessment. Relapsed or Progressive Disease (PD) requires the following: a. Appearance of any new lesions, b. Increase by \>=50% in the size of previously involved sites, c. \>= 50% increase in greatest diameter of any previously identified node greater than 1 cm in its short axis or in the SPD of more than one node, d. \>= 50% increase from nadir in the product diameter of any previously identified abnormal node for PRs or nonresponders, e. Enlarging spleen or liver. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determineTTP. 95% 2-sided confidence interval were calculated using stratified Cox proportional hazard regression.
Timepoint [7] 0 0
From enrollment to up to 6 months from 1st dose.
Secondary outcome [8] 0 0
Duration of Response (CR+CRu+PR)
Assessment method [8] 0 0
Time from date measurement criteria met for CR, CRu, or PR (whichever occurred first) until first date relapsed disease/date of death. CR: Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical, radiographic evidence of disease, disease-related symptoms, normalization of NHL assignable biochemical abnormalities; lymph nodes, nodal masses regressed to normal size; spleen size regressed, not palpable on physical exam, size of other organs enlarged due to disease. CRu: CR but allows for: residual lymph node mass \>1.5 cm in greatest transverse diameter that regressed \>75% in product diameter. Individual nodes previously confluent, regressed by \>75% in their product diameters; Indeterminate bone marrow. PR: =50% decrease in SPD of 6 largest dominant nodes/nodal masses; No increase in size of other nodes, liver, or spleen; Splenic/hepatic nodules regressed by =50% in SPD; Except splenic/hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs assessable and no measurable disease present.
Timepoint [8] 0 0
Time from date measurement criteria are met for CR, CRu, or PR (whichever status is recorded first) until the first date relapsed disease or date of death (whichever occurs first) is objectively documented.
Secondary outcome [9] 0 0
Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Profile From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinite Time (AUCinf) of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 30 and Day 58
Assessment method [9] 0 0
Serum concentration of inotuzumab ozogamicin on Dosing Days 30 and 58 were measured. AUCinf of inotuzumab ozogamicin was reported. AUCinf: AUClast (area under the serum concentration-time profile for inotuzumab ozogamicin from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration) +(Clast \[last quantifiable concentration\]/kel \[elimination rate constant\]) where Clast is the predicted serum concentration of inotuzumab ozogamicin at the last quantifiable timepoint estimated from the log-linear regression analysis. Study Days Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57 and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Timepoint [9] 0 0
Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Secondary outcome [10] 0 0
AUClast of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 1, Day 30 and Day 58
Assessment method [10] 0 0
Serum concentration of inotuzumab ozogamicin on Dosing Days 1, 30 and 58 were measured. AUC of inotuzumab ozogamicin was reported. AUClast is area under the serum concentration-time profile from time zero to the time of the Clast, using Linear/Log trapezoidal method. Study Days Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 1 for Cycle 1; Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Timepoint [10] 0 0
Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Secondary outcome [11] 0 0
Time of the Last Quantifiable Serum Concentration in a Dosing Interval (Tlast) of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Participants Receving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 1, Day 30 and Day 58
Assessment method [11] 0 0
Tlast of inotuzumab ozogamicin on Dosing Days 1, 30, and 58 was reported. Tlast: Time of last quantifiable concentration of inotuzumab ozogamicin. Observed directly from data. Study Days Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 1 for Cycle 1; Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Timepoint [11] 0 0
Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Secondary outcome [12] 0 0
Area Under the Steady-state Serum Concentration-time Curve (AUCtau) of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Participants Receving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 1, Day 30 and Day 58
Assessment method [12] 0 0
Steady-state serum concentrations of inotuzumab ozogamicin on Dosing Days 1, 30 and 58 were measured. AUCtau of inotuzumab ozogamicin was reported. AUCtau=AUC over dosage interval tau calculated using Linear/log trapezoidal method. Study Days Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 1 for Cycle 1; Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Timepoint [12] 0 0
Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Secondary outcome [13] 0 0
Peak Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Participants Receving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 1, Day 30 and Day 58
Assessment method [13] 0 0
Serum concentration of inotuzumab ozogamicin on Dosing Days 1, 30, and 58 were measured. Cmax of inotuzumab ozogamicin was reported. Cmax was observed directly from data. Study Days Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 1 for Cycle 1; Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Timepoint [13] 0 0
Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Secondary outcome [14] 0 0
Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 1, Day 30 and Day 58
Assessment method [14] 0 0
Tmax: Time at which Cmax occurs. Observed directly from data as time of first occurrence. Study Days Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 1 for Cycle 1; Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Timepoint [14] 0 0
Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Secondary outcome [15] 0 0
Average Serum Concentration at Steady State (Cav) of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 30 and Day 58
Assessment method [15] 0 0
Cav: AUCtau (Area under the concentration time profile)/tau for Dosing Day 30 Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 Cycle 3. Study Days Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57 and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Timepoint [15] 0 0
Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Secondary outcome [16] 0 0
Minimum Observed Serum Trough Concentration (Cmin) of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab+Rituximab on Dosing Day 30 and Day 58
Assessment method [16] 0 0
Cmin: Lowest concentration observed during the dosing interval tau. Observed directly from data from Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3. Study Days Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57 and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Timepoint [16] 0 0
Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Secondary outcome [17] 0 0
Clearance (CL) of Serum Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab+Rituximab on Dosing Day 30 and Day 58
Assessment method [17] 0 0
Clearance is defined as Dose/AUCinf. Study Days Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57 and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Timepoint [17] 0 0
Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Secondary outcome [18] 0 0
Steady-state Volume of Distribution (Vss) of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Serum in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab MTD+Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 30 and Day 58
Assessment method [18] 0 0
Vss of inotuzumab ozogamicin on Dosing Days 30 and 58 were reported. Vss=CL\*MRT (mean residence time). Study Days Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57 and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Timepoint [18] 0 0
Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Secondary outcome [19] 0 0
MRT of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Serum in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 30 and Day 58
Assessment method [19] 0 0
MRT: AUMCinf/AUCinf - DOF (degrees of freedom)/2, where AUMCinf is the area under the first moment curve derived using the linear/log trapezoidal method, and DOF is the duration of the IV infusion dose. Study Days Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57 and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Timepoint [19] 0 0
Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Secondary outcome [20] 0 0
Serum Decay Half-Life (t1/2) of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 30 and Day 58
Assessment method [20] 0 0
Termnial half-life (t½): Loge(2)/kel, where kel is the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration-time curve. Study Days Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57 and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Timepoint [20] 0 0
Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Secondary outcome [21] 0 0
AUCinf of Total Calicheamicin (Conjugated + Unconjugated) in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 30 and Day 58
Assessment method [21] 0 0
AUCinf: AUClast+(Clast/kel) where Clast is the predicted serum concentration at the last quantifiable timepoint estimated from the log-linear regression analysis. Study Days Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57 and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Timepoint [21] 0 0
Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Secondary outcome [22] 0 0
AUClast of Total Calicheamicin (Conjugated Plus Unconjugated) in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 1, Day 30 and Day 58
Assessment method [22] 0 0
AUClast: AUC over dosage interval through last measurable time point, Tlast, using Linear/Log trapezoidal method. Study Days Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 1 for Cycle 1; Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Timepoint [22] 0 0
Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Secondary outcome [23] 0 0
Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration in a Dosing Interval (Tlast) of Total Calicheamicin (Conjugated Plus Unconjugated) in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 1, Day 30 and Day 58
Assessment method [23] 0 0
Tlast: Time of last quantifiable concentration. Observed directly from data. Study Days Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 1 for Cycle 1; Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Timepoint [23] 0 0
Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Secondary outcome [24] 0 0
Area Under the Steady-state Serum Concentration-time Curve (AUCtau) for Total Calicheamicin (Conjugated Plus Unconjugated) in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 1, Day 30, and Day 58
Assessment method [24] 0 0
AUCtau=AUC over dosage interval tau calculated using Linear/log trapezoidal method. Study Days Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 1 for Cycle 1; Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Timepoint [24] 0 0
Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Secondary outcome [25] 0 0
Peak Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Total Calicheamicin (Conjugated Plus Unconjugated) in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 1, Day 30 and Day 58
Assessment method [25] 0 0
Cmax: Observed directly from data Study Days Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 1 for Cycle 1; Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Timepoint [25] 0 0
Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Secondary outcome [26] 0 0
Time of Observed Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Total Calicheamicin (Conjugated+Unconjugated) in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 1, Day 30 and Day 58
Assessment method [26] 0 0
Tmax: Time at which Cmax occurs. Observed directly from data as time of first occurrence. Study Days Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 1 for Cycle 1; Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Timepoint [26] 0 0
Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Secondary outcome [27] 0 0
Average Serum Concentration (Cav) of Total Calicheamicin (Conjugated Plus Unconjugated) in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 30 and Day 58
Assessment method [27] 0 0
Cav: AUCtau/tau for Dosing Day 30 Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 Cycle 3. Study Days Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57 and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Timepoint [27] 0 0
Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Secondary outcome [28] 0 0
Minimum Observed Serum Trough Concentration (Cmin) of Total Calicheamicin (Conjugated Plus Unconjugated) in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 30 and Day 58
Assessment method [28] 0 0
Cmin: Lowest concentration observed during the dosing interval tau. Observed directly from data from Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Day 58 for Cycle 3. Study Days Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57 and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Timepoint [28] 0 0
Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Secondary outcome [29] 0 0
Clearance (CL) of Total Calicheamicin (Conjugated Plus Unconjugated) in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 30 and Day 58
Assessment method [29] 0 0
Clearance defined as Dose/AUCinf. Corresponds to Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2 and dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3. Study Days Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57 and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Timepoint [29] 0 0
Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Secondary outcome [30] 0 0
Steady-state Volume (Vss) of Total Calicheamicin (Conjugated Plus Unconjugated) Distribution in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 30 and Day 58
Assessment method [30] 0 0
Vss: Steady-state volume of distribution CL\*MRT of inotuzumab ozogamicin Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Day 58 for Cycle 3. Study Days Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57 and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Timepoint [30] 0 0
Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Secondary outcome [31] 0 0
Mean Residence Time (MRT) of Total Calicheamicin (Conjugated Plus Unconjugated) in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 30 and Day 58
Assessment method [31] 0 0
MRT: AUMCinf/AUCinf - DOF/2, where AUMCinf is the area under the first moment curve derived using the linear/log trapezoidal method, and DOF is the duration of the IV infusion dose. Study Days Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57 and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Timepoint [31] 0 0
Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Secondary outcome [32] 0 0
Serum Decay Half-Life (t1/2) of Total Calicheamicin (Conjugated Plus Unconjugated) in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 30 and Day 58
Assessment method [32] 0 0
Termnial half-life (t½): Loge(2)/kel, where kel is the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration-time curve. Study Days Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57 and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Timepoint [32] 0 0
Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Secondary outcome [33] 0 0
Area Under the Steady-state Serum Concentration-time Curve (AUClast) of Unconjugated Calicheamicin in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 1, Day 30 and Day 58
Assessment method [33] 0 0
AUClast: AUC over dosage interval through last measurable time point, Tlast, using Linear/Log trapezoidal method. Study Days Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 1 for Cycle 1; Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Timepoint [33] 0 0
Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Secondary outcome [34] 0 0
Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration in a Dosing Interval (Tlast) of Unconjugated Calicheamicin in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 1, Day 30 and Day 58
Assessment method [34] 0 0
Tlast: Time of last quantifiable concentration. Observed directly from data. Study Days Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 1 for Cycle 1; Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Timepoint [34] 0 0
Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Secondary outcome [35] 0 0
Peak Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Unconjugated Calicheamicin in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 1, Day 30 and Day 58
Assessment method [35] 0 0
Cmax: Observed directly from data Study Days Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 1 for Cycle 1; Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Timepoint [35] 0 0
Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Secondary outcome [36] 0 0
Time of Observed Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Unconjugated Calicheamicin in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin + Rituximab on Dosing Day 1, Day 30 and Day 58
Assessment method [36] 0 0
Tmax: Time at which Cmax occurs. Observed directly from data as time of first occurrence. Study Days Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 1 for Cycle 1; Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Timepoint [36] 0 0
Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Secondary outcome [37] 0 0
Minimum Observed Serum Trough Concentration (Cmin) of Unconjugated Calicheamicin in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin+Rituximab on Dosing Day 30 and Day 58
Assessment method [37] 0 0
Cmin: Lowest concentration observed during the dosing interval tau. Study Days Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57 and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Timepoint [37] 0 0
Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Secondary outcome [38] 0 0
Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Profile From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinite Time (AUCinf) of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Antibody in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m2 on Dosing Day 30 and Day 58
Assessment method [38] 0 0
AUCinf: AUClast+(Clast/kel) where Clast is the predicted serum concentration at the last quantifiable timepoint estimated from the log-linear regression analysis. Study Days Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57 and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Timepoint [38] 0 0
Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Secondary outcome [39] 0 0
Area Under the Steady-state Concentration-time Curve (AUClast) of Serum Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Antibody in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 1, Day 30 and Day 58
Assessment method [39] 0 0
AUClast: AUC over dosage interval through last measurable time point, Tlast, using Linear/Log trapezoidal method. Study Days Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 1 for Cycle 1; Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Timepoint [39] 0 0
Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Secondary outcome [40] 0 0
Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration in a Dosing Interval (Tlast) of Serum Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Antibody in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 1, Day 30 and Day 58
Assessment method [40] 0 0
Tlast: Time of last quantifiable concentration. Observed directly from data. Study Days Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 1 for Cycle 1; Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Timepoint [40] 0 0
Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Secondary outcome [41] 0 0
Serum Decay Half-Life (t1/2) of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Antibody in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab on Dosing Day 30 and Day 58
Assessment method [41] 0 0
Termnial half-life (t½): Loge(2)/kel, where kel is the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration-time curve. Study Days Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57 and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Timepoint [41] 0 0
Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Secondary outcome [42] 0 0
Area Under the Steady-state Serum Concentration-time Curve (AUCtau) of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Antibody in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD+ Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 1, Day 30, and Day 58
Assessment method [42] 0 0
AUCtau=AUC over dosage interval tau calculated using Linear/log trapezoidal method. Study Days Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 1 for Cycle 1; Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Timepoint [42] 0 0
Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Secondary outcome [43] 0 0
Peak Concentration (Cmax) of Serum Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Antibody in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 1, Day 30 and Day 58
Assessment method [43] 0 0
Cmax: Observed directly from data Study Days Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 1 for Cycle 1; Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Timepoint [43] 0 0
Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Secondary outcome [44] 0 0
Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Serum Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Antibody in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 1, Day 30 and Day 58
Assessment method [44] 0 0
Tmax: Time at which Cmax occurs. Observed directly from data as time of first occurrence. Study Days Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 1 for Cycle 1; Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Timepoint [44] 0 0
Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Secondary outcome [45] 0 0
Average Serum Concentration (Cav) of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Antibody in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 30 and Day 58
Assessment method [45] 0 0
Cav: AUCtau/tau for Dosing Day 30 Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 Cycle 3. Study Days Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57 and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Timepoint [45] 0 0
Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Secondary outcome [46] 0 0
Minimum Observed Serum Trough Concentration (Cmin) of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Antibody in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 30 and Day 58
Assessment method [46] 0 0
Cmin: Lowest concentration observed during the dosing interval tau. Study Days Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57 and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Timepoint [46] 0 0
Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Secondary outcome [47] 0 0
Clearance (CL) of Serum Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Antibody in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 30 and Day 58
Assessment method [47] 0 0
Clearance defined as Dose/AUCinf. Study Days Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57 and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Timepoint [47] 0 0
Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Secondary outcome [48] 0 0
Steady-state Volume (Vss) of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Antibody Distribution in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 30 and Day 58
Assessment method [48] 0 0
Vss: Steady-state volume of distribution CL\*MRT of inotuzumab ozogamicin Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Day 58 for Cycle 3. Study Days Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57 and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Timepoint [48] 0 0
Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85

Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Subjects with CD20 and CD22-positive, follicular or diffuse large B-cell NHL who have not responded or progressed after 1 or 2 prior therapies; or subjects with CD20 and CD22-positive intermediate/aggressive NHL (diffuse large B-cell, mantle cell, transformed follicular or follicular grade 3b NHL) who have not responded or progressed after 1 or more prior therapies and are refractory to a previous rituximab containing therapy.
* Prior therapy must contain at least one course of rituximab therapy, as single agent or in combination.
* Measurable disease.
Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
No limit
Sex
Both males and females
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Key exclusion criteria
* Subjects who are candidates for other potentially curative therapies.
* Subjects must not have received previous radioimmunotherapy.
* Subjects who have undergone a prior bone marrow transplantation within the last 6 months.

Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Allocation to intervention
Non-randomised trial
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Who is / are masked / blinded?



Intervention assignment
Factorial
Other design features
Phase
Phase 1
Type of endpoint/s
Statistical methods / analysis

Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Data analysis
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Other reasons
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
4/05/2006
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Actual
2/06/2014
Sample size
Target
Accrual to date
Final
119
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Brisbane, QL
Recruitment hospital [1] 0 0
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital - Herston
Recruitment postcode(s) [1] 0 0
4029 - Herston
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [1] 0 0
Alabama
Country [2] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [2] 0 0
California
Country [3] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [3] 0 0
Georgia
Country [4] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [4] 0 0
Illinois
Country [5] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [5] 0 0
Nevada
Country [6] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [6] 0 0
New York
Country [7] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [7] 0 0
Ohio
Country [8] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [8] 0 0
Pennsylvania
Country [9] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [9] 0 0
Texas
Country [10] 0 0
Belgium
State/province [10] 0 0
Vlaams-brabant
Country [11] 0 0
Belgium
State/province [11] 0 0
Gent
Country [12] 0 0
France
State/province [12] 0 0
Le Chesnay
Country [13] 0 0
France
State/province [13] 0 0
Paris
Country [14] 0 0
France
State/province [14] 0 0
Pierre Benite
Country [15] 0 0
Germany
State/province [15] 0 0
Bonn
Country [16] 0 0
Germany
State/province [16] 0 0
Mainz
Country [17] 0 0
Hong Kong
State/province [17] 0 0
Shatin N.T.
Country [18] 0 0
Italy
State/province [18] 0 0
Roma
Country [19] 0 0
Korea, Republic of
State/province [19] 0 0
Seoul
Country [20] 0 0
Netherlands
State/province [20] 0 0
Zuid-holland
Country [21] 0 0
Poland
State/province [21] 0 0
Warszawa
Country [22] 0 0
Spain
State/province [22] 0 0
Barcelona
Country [23] 0 0
Switzerland
State/province [23] 0 0
Zurich
Country [24] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [24] 0 0
Devon
Country [25] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [25] 0 0
Hampshire
Country [26] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [26] 0 0
London

Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Name
Pfizer
Country
Other collaborator category [1] 0 0
Commercial sector/industry
Name [1] 0 0
UCB Pharma
Country [1] 0 0

Ethics approval
Ethics application status

Summary
Brief summary
Trial website
Trial related presentations / publications
Public notes

Contacts
Principal investigator
Name 0 0
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Address 0 0
Pfizer
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for public queries
Name 0 0
Address 0 0
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for scientific queries

No information has been provided regarding IPD availability


What supporting documents are/will be available?

No Supporting Document Provided


Results publications and other study-related documents

No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.

Results are available at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00299494